Author Topic: Mid Terms Elections Thread  (Read 6011 times)

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
Re: Mid Terms Elections Thread
« Reply #25 on: October 23, 2014, 12:07:53 PM »
There are people on this board who defend Obama more then a shit ton of sitting dem senators who owe their very political life to barry and his bullshit
L

LurkerNoMore

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33668
  • Dumb people think Trump is smart.
Re: Mid Terms Elections Thread
« Reply #26 on: October 23, 2014, 12:14:35 PM »
The GOP is slated to pick up 8 Senate seats alone. 

Senate Democrats wont even admit to voting for Obama let alone supporting his disastrous agenda

And lose how many in return when Hillary runs?

whork

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6587
  • Getbig!
Re: Mid Terms Elections Thread
« Reply #27 on: October 23, 2014, 12:58:25 PM »
This is blockbuster news, because the Republican Party is dead.  I read it right here on getbig.com. 

One can only hope but there are to many stupid voters for that to happen.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66395
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Mid Terms Elections Thread
« Reply #28 on: October 23, 2014, 05:12:41 PM »
One can only hope but there are to many stupid voters for that to happen.

 ::)  Which candidate will you be pretending to vote for in this election? 

whork

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6587
  • Getbig!
Re: Mid Terms Elections Thread
« Reply #29 on: October 23, 2014, 06:55:13 PM »
::)  Which candidate will you be pretending to vote for in this election? 


Probably Hillary.

But what i am gonna enjoy the most will be the republican debates.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Mid Terms Elections Thread
« Reply #30 on: October 23, 2014, 09:07:11 PM »
any polls on voter enthusiasm for this election vs 2006 and 2010? 

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41757
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Mid Terms Elections Thread
« Reply #32 on: October 25, 2014, 07:02:53 AM »
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2014/10/24/could-non-citizens-decide-the-november-election



 :( >:(

rush did a great piece on this recently.  He said in Jan, they advertised childcare for the flood of illegals that "spontaneously" arrived in March.  All planned.

And he said they made a govt contact for a printing company.  They needed to be able to print 9 mil green cards this year, and 34 million over the next 3 years.  AMNESTY!

This was all on rush limbaugh on thursday afternoon.  He absolutely made the case that voter cards were the goal of amnesty cause the vast majority of illegals was going to become a dem.

But hey, no need to impeach obama, right?  Shaking my head.  :(

Kazan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6799
  • Sic vis pacem, parabellum
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41757
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41757
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41757
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41757
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41757
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41757
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41757
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Mid Terms Elections Thread
« Reply #40 on: October 29, 2014, 08:05:19 AM »
Obama So Unpopular, Even MA Dems Don't Want Him Campaigning in Their State
Townhall.com ^  | October 29, 2014 | Donald Lambro

Posted on ‎10‎/‎29‎/‎2014‎ ‎10‎:‎39‎:‎38‎ ‎AM by Kaslin

http://media.townhall.com/townhall/reu/ha/2014/301/72a67c30-6141-4574-bf5e-089df2ca38f7.jpg>

WASHINGTON - Americans go to the polls in seven days to cast their votes in a midterm election that's shaping up to be an angry outcry over the disastrous direction of the country.

For the past six years, the Democrats have effectively been in charge by virtue of the fact that Barack Obama sits in the White House, setting policy, and his party is in control of the Senate (at least for now) that can block any legislation passed by the House Republicans.

But even though Democrats control the major gates of power, Obama and his party have sought to convince the voters that all of their mistakes and failures are the result of the GOP or the previous Republican administration.

That duplicitous shell game worked for several years, but in the end, discerning Americans learned who was really to blame for all of their woes -- and said so when they put the GOP back in control of the Democratic-run House in 2010.

And are likely to inflict the same punishment next week on Majority Leader Harry Reid and his gang of Democrats in the Senate.

Over the last half dozen years, the national news media took great pleasure in endlessly reciting polls showing how unpopular the Republicans had become since the 2008 recession.

But they are unsurprisingly quiet about recent polls that show the Democratic Party's approval scores plunging to their lowest rating in decades.

A Washington Post/ABC News poll released Sunday found the disapproval rating for Democrats in Congress has now risen to its highest point in two decades.

This is the political environment that the Democrats are facing when voters go to the polls on Nov. 4

in what will be a nationwide referendum to decide which party should be in control of Congress for the last two years of Obama's trouble-plagued presidency.

Have you noticed that the president has been unusually subdued in the last few weeks? He has been beaten down by events and his own circumstances, seldom making any major news, or at least the kind that makes the front page or leads the nightly news shows.

The country is in the midst of a competitive, down-to-the wire, midterm election battle and Obama isn't getting a lot invitations and pleas from his party's besieged candidates to campaign for them.

Quite the contrary, the message has gone out to the White House from Democrats in tight races that his is so unpopular, the best thing he can do for them is to stay as far away as possible. So Obama has been relegated to campaigning only in dyed-in-the-wool Democratic states where his party's candidates are not in trouble.

Indeed, even in some heavily Democratic states, where he won big in 2012, he is being asked to stay out. It didn't get the attention it deserves, but Obama was asked not to go into Massachusetts to campaign for Democrat Martha Coakley who is running behind her Republican opponent, Charlie Baker, in the race for governor.

Obama easily carried the liberal Democratic state by 23 points, but now he is the kiss of death for any Democrat in a tight race. Democratic political pros were hard pressed to think of a time when their party's president couldn't campaign in a midterm election in Massachusetts.

With his approval polls sinking to near 40 percent (the same percentage of people who tell the Gallup poll they're "struggling" in this economy), he's no longer the political force he once was. Instead, he has become his party's political albatross.

It is hard to remember a president who has been the cause of so many unpopular reforms -- from Obamacare -- whose costs are still mounting, to an anemic economy that millions of Americans say is in a recession. It won't make the nightly network news tonight, but the latest evidence of this economy's chronic weakness came out Tuesday

when the Commerce Department announced the nation's durable goods orders fell in September for the second month in a row.

The report revealed a 1.3 percent decline in business demand for machinery, computers and other goods which suggests a sluggish economy.

That followed an 18.3 percent decline in August that signaled businesses were "reluctant to invest in updating equipment," the Bloomberg Business News reported.

The housing sector isn't so hot, either. U.S. sales of new homes were close to flat in September. Not a good sign in a struggling economy.

As for the jobs issue, Americans are justified in taking the Obama administration's 5.9 percent unemployment rate with a huge grain of salt. For one thing, it leaves out millions of workers who tell government pollsters they've stopped looking for full-time work because they can't find work. So they are not counted among the jobless.

The administration's shady employment numbers are swollen by part-time, "underemployed" workers who say they need full-time work to make ends meet.

The Gallup Poll, which conducts its own, and probably more accurate employment survey, puts the jobless rate at 6.2 percent and the all-too-often ignored underemployed rate at 15 percent.

Then comes a Federal Reserve study that found the median household is now worth less than it was back in 1989.

Despite Obama's claim that we're doing better than we were before he was president, economics analyst Matt O'Brien, who writes for the Washington Post's Wonkblog, suggests that's not true.

"The new harsh reality is that the bottom 90 percent of households are poorer today than they were in 1987," he writes.

The good part about these elections is that the voters will have a chance to register their disapproval of Obama and the Democrats. The bad part is that after the votes are counted, Obama will still be in office for another two years.

But if the Republican campaign goes according to plan, he will be a president without a majority party behind him or a viable agenda -- while a revitalized GOP reaches out to rebuild and expand its party in preparation for the 2016 presidential election to come.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41757
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41757
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.

andreisdaman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16720
Re: Mid Terms Elections Thread
« Reply #43 on: October 30, 2014, 09:48:36 AM »
NOTHING TO SEE HERE.........Presidents in their second term are always unpopular and the politicians who want to be re-elected run away from the president in droves during the mid-terms........ 8)

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41757
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Mid Terms Elections Thread
« Reply #44 on: October 30, 2014, 09:53:19 AM »
NOTHING TO SEE HERE.........Presidents in their second term are always unpopular and the politicians who want to be re-elected run away from the president in droves during the mid-terms........ 8)

Gaybama was supposed to be different remember?  The one we were waiting for?   LMFAO!

andreisdaman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16720
Re: Mid Terms Elections Thread
« Reply #45 on: October 30, 2014, 09:55:44 AM »
Gaybama was supposed to be different remember?  The one we were waiting for?   LMFAO!

sigh...ALL presidents advertise themselves as "different" and "change agents"...Romney did the same thing

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41757
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Mid Terms Elections Thread
« Reply #46 on: October 30, 2014, 10:00:29 AM »
sigh...ALL presidents advertise themselves as "different" and "change agents"...Romney did the same thing

Difference is that you believed in Obama so much that you were in tears remember?  Remember Benn'y thread about Obama and Egypt and you were near crying over your messiah? 

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41757
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Mid Terms Elections Thread
« Reply #47 on: October 30, 2014, 10:01:48 AM »
Hill panic: 300-600 Senate Dem staffers would be fired in GOP win
Washington Examiner ^  | October 30, 2014 | Paul Bedard

Posted on ‎10‎/‎30‎/‎2014‎ ‎12‎:‎22‎:‎53‎ ‎PM by Parmenio

With projections of a GOP win growing daily, nervousness in Senate committee offices has turned to panic as an army of Democratic staffers braces to be fired, replaced by a Republican majority and their aides.

The spoils of political war? Estimates are that 300-600 Democratic committee and personal staff jobs would be on the chopping block if the Republicans pull off the expected victory.

“There will be a mass exodus of Senate Democrat staff from committees,” said one insider.

And Republicans will get to hire hundreds more aides. A loss on Tuesday that keeps the Democrats in charge of the Senate will cost no GOP jobs, other than those working for retiring lawmakers.

Under a Senate deal cut by Majority Leader Harry Reid and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, the funding and staff breakdown on committees is about 60 percent for the majority, and 40 percent for the minority. It had been two-thirds majority, one-third minority, but the GOP cut the deal in order to keep their minimum funding at 40 percent.

Also getting hit would be the offices of Reid and other Democratic leaders.

For Democratic staffers, the potential layoffs couldn’t come at a worse time. According to officials, some will find jobs in the Obama administration, but those openings are few and will last only two years. And Hillary Clinton’s team is already loaded up with long-time aides, leaving few policy jobs for outsiders.

"There will be nowhere in the downtown private sector to go. Maybe 10 percent can find a slot in the Obama administration. It will be ugly," said a former White House aide now working on K Street.

That's because many lobbying firms are full-up with Democrats.

And there are already a sizable number of Democratic staffers already looking for work since their bosses are retiring.

“It could be a lot of individuals. And that’s not even counting all the people looking for work now with a retirement coming up,” said a key Senate Democratic staffer.

andreisdaman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16720
Re: Mid Terms Elections Thread
« Reply #48 on: October 30, 2014, 10:17:25 AM »
Difference is that you believed in Obama so much that you were in tears remember?  Remember Benn'y thread about Obama and Egypt and you were near crying over your messiah? 

as I recall it, YOU WERE THE ONE IN TEARS after Romney lost because you believed so badly that he would win.....so much so that you disappeared from GETBIG for awhile.....TRUE????...and lets not forget all the other conservative losers you embraced along the way such as Palin and Herm.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41757
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Mid Terms Elections Thread
« Reply #49 on: October 30, 2014, 10:31:02 AM »
as I recall it, YOU WERE THE ONE IN TEARS after Romney lost because you believed so badly that he would win.....so much so that you disappeared from GETBIG for awhile.....TRUE????...and lets not forget all the other conservative losers you embraced along the way such as Palin and Herm.

Nice deflection.  Want me to bump the thread again where you said you were near tears crying because you thought Imam Ayatollah Obama El Baracki was doing such a wonderful job in the ME?