Author Topic: It's Between Henry & LEE. Henry is more ripped! Henry is your True Ironman Champ (Read 13577 times)

gammahydroxy · « **Reply #25 on:** February 18, 2006, 04:29:07 PM »

here's lee ripped to the bone at 192lbs at the 2004 san fran

gammahydroxy · « **Reply #26 on:** February 18, 2006, 04:30:30 PM »

here's another

gammahydroxy · « **Reply #27 on:** February 18, 2006, 04:34:06 PM »

well its the first contest of the year..Lee usually warms up at the ironman..you can bet your ass lee's going to look awesome at the arnold and ausatralia

Snotroot · « **Reply #28 on:** February 18, 2006, 04:35:50 PM »

yeah he never peaks in the first few shows, it takes him all year to figure it out again.

Disgusted · « **Reply #29 on:** February 18, 2006, 04:37:56 PM »

Quote from: gammahydroxy on February 18, 2006, 04:34:06 PM

well its the first contest of the year..Lee usually warms up at the ironman..you can bet your ass lee's going to look awesome at the arnold and ausatralia

Thanks for the pics bro. Yep, 195-198 would be ideal. He's a tad bigger now.

sarcasm · « **Reply #30 on:** February 18, 2006, 04:38:08 PM »

Lee's quads are still smooth as the day is long in those comparison shots with Henry.

Palpatine Q · « **Reply #31 on:** February 18, 2006, 04:38:08 PM »

Priest is the most over-rated pro. He has sick arms and nothing else.

420 Diesel · « **Reply #32 on:** February 18, 2006, 04:43:03 PM »

i disagree. his lower body is way underrated. his legs are the perfect size and shape, he just needs to nail conditioning. in my opinion, lee's only structural weaknesses are his back and pecs.

gammahydroxy · « **Reply #33 on:** February 18, 2006, 05:02:22 PM »

Quote from: 420 Diesel on February 18, 2006, 04:43:03 PM

i disagree. his lower body is way underrated. his legs are the perfect size and shape, he just needs to nail conditioning. in my opinion, lee's only structural weaknesses are his back and pecs.

the chest is pretty good..however, it's over powered by his delts, tri's, bi's. His lower back is his weak point..He has to much extra skin there..It didn't help matters that he used to bulk so heavy..coming close to 300 lbs once..

rocket · « **Reply #34 on:** February 18, 2006, 05:10:45 PM »

You know I was wondering why people were saying its all henry from the back so I went to the pics and there is basically no direct comparison pics. Here are some pics to illustrate this

Does Henry win this or does lee? Lower back henry, rest seems to be Lee.. is one of them not doing the pose right - it looks as if Lee is more detailed upper back and far more dense.. hmm.. basically looks like they are doing different versions of the pose.

This is the only one that people really post, seems to me that a: its a different pose and the only conclusion you can probably draw from these two pictures (basically that is all that is on flex) is that lee's lower back isn't as good.

So whether "its all henry from the back" remains to be seen.

420 Diesel · « **Reply #35 on:** February 18, 2006, 05:11:16 PM »

i don't think it's his lower back, i think it's that he his lats have high insertions.

rocket · « **Reply #36 on:** February 18, 2006, 05:15:27 PM »

Its pics like these that show why its 50/50..

rocket · « **Reply #37 on:** February 18, 2006, 05:18:14 PM »

Quote from: 420 Diesel on February 18, 2006, 05:11:16 PM

i don't think it's his lower back, i think it's that he his lats have high insertions.

His lats insert a little higher compared to his torso but there is definitely a lot of skin that ruins the conditioning mark.
Everybody has their weakness though.. lee has amazing arm detail whilst henry seems to be nowhere near that.

(nothing) · « **Reply #38 on:** February 18, 2006, 05:19:12 PM »

lee is clearly beats david in this shot!

rocket · « **Reply #39 on:** February 18, 2006, 05:25:04 PM »

No shot appears to be clear really, its a mixed bag. To me lee wins more than he loses though.

People on this board have a short memory but there was a huge percentage of members who ardently thought jay should have won.. and I said then that they wouldn't be saying that in a few months and sure enough those who swore blind he should have won have been seen admitting the truth.

I bet that happens with this comp too.

Snotroot · « **Reply #40 on:** February 18, 2006, 05:26:48 PM »

so what are you saying?

Bast175 · « **Reply #41 on:** February 18, 2006, 05:28:49 PM »

Lee's lower stomach sticks out in some poses, and his back is narrow, and he's smooth. But he still destroys Henry on Size so Lee should win.

candidate2025 · « **Reply #42 on:** February 18, 2006, 05:30:30 PM »

lee has a better back...better legs...better arms.....and dare i say it.. better chest? !!! ??

rocket · « **Reply #43 on:** February 18, 2006, 05:32:39 PM »

I'm saying Lee will win and those crying henry will have to wait for another day.

This picture illustrates why he will win. Henry is solid but the freak is going to get the nod.

Terry Gibson · « **Reply #44 on:** February 18, 2006, 05:36:59 PM »

Aren,t you supposed to have a complete physique to win Henry needs calfs biceps and forarms

Croatch · « **Reply #45 on:** February 18, 2006, 05:47:37 PM »

Moral of the story. If you're under 5' 6", you'd better be jacked. Henry looks like an Umpa Loompa on steroids.

Dnizneer · « **Reply #46 on:** February 18, 2006, 06:02:04 PM »

Lee has better arms, legs, chest, delts, calves, forearms. Henry has a more detailed back and is drier. So Lee should win. Henry is getting better.

Harry R. M. Pitts · « **Reply #47 on:** February 18, 2006, 06:26:41 PM »

What happened to Troy? Any pics, haven't seen any.

gibberj2 · « **Reply #48 on:** February 18, 2006, 06:27:40 PM »

Lee wins from the front

Oliver Klaushof · « **Reply #49 on:** February 18, 2006, 06:49:36 PM »

Lee looks better. He just overpowers this Henry character. The only thing the other guy has on him is glutes and hamstrings.

Author Topic: It's Between Henry & LEE. Henry is more ripped! Henry is your True Ironman Champ (Read 13577 times)

Bast175