Author Topic: Is Hillary Hiding Something  (Read 118254 times)

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63756
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #650 on: September 13, 2016, 10:08:35 AM »
This person who had access to her server did not have a security clearance:

One witness, Justin Cooper, a former White House aide to President Bill Clinton, is answering the committee's questions. Chaffetz said Cooper purchased the first server used by Clinton and registered the clintonemail.com domain name. Cooper also helped set up Clinton's mobile communications.

Cooper told the committee that he did not have a security clearance during the period he was performing this work.


http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/republicans-call-tech-experts-testify-clintons-server-42049593

Skeletor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15669
  • Silence you furry fool!
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #651 on: September 13, 2016, 10:51:17 AM »
Clinton IT specialist ignores subpoena for House hearing; other witnesses plead 5th
Published September 13, 2016 
FoxNews.com

The former State Department IT specialist who set up Hillary Clinton’s private server ignored a subpoena to appear Tuesday before a House committee hearing, while other tech experts who helped maintain the system asserted their Fifth Amendment right not to testify – frustrating Republican lawmakers trying to dig deeper into the former secretary of state’s email setup.

House oversight committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, said he’ll now consider a “full range of options” to address IT aide Bryan Pagliano’s “failure” to attend.

“He should be here. … It is not optional,” Chaffetz said. “His attendance is required here.”

Pagliano is considered a vital witness in the Clinton email case. He spoke previously to the FBI under immunity, telling the bureau there were no successful security breaches of the server. Pagliano also refused to answer questions last year before a House panel investigating the deadly 2012 attacks in Benghazi, Libya. His lawyers said at the time that Pagliano did not want to relinquish his rights under the U.S. Constitution's Fifth Amendment against self-incrimination.

Republicans on Tuesday questioned why Pagliano would avoid the latest hearing if he had immunity, though Democrats pushed back. According to Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., Pagliano’s lawyer said the request was an “abuse of process.”

Two other officials from Platte River Networks, Bill Thornton and Paul Combetta, did comply with subpoenas to appear. However, when it came time to answer questions, they pleaded the Fifth. The Denver-based technology company maintained Clinton’s server when it was moved from her Chappaqua, New York, home to a data center in northern New Jersey.

Combetta took the Fifth six times and Thornton took the Fifth four times, before both witnesses were excused.

After each question, they recited a variation of the line: “On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer and assert my Fifth Amendment constitutional privilege.”


Cummings said he could “understand” why they were not addressing questions.

But Chaffetz voiced frustration when Thornton declined to even answer whether he’d been questioned by the FBI. GOP lawmakers have wanted to question tech officials on the deletion of email records and other alleged attempts to destroy devices.

Chaffetz also said there will be consequences for Pagliano's refusal to appear and for "thumbing his nose at Congress." He didn't specify what the penalties would be but said, "We're not letting go of this."

A letter from Pagliano's attorney released by the committee says Pagliano will continue to assert his constitutional right not to testify.

The only witness remaining after the unfruitful initial questioning was Bill Clinton aide Justin Cooper, who answered lawmakers’ questions.

During that process, he confirmed that he had access to the Clinton server but did not hold a security clearance.

The email issue has shadowed Clinton's candidacy, and Republicans have been steadfast in focusing on her use of a private server for government business, with several high-profile hearings leading up to the election. Democrats insist the sole purpose of the hearings is to undermine Clinton's bid for the presidency.

Chaffetz on Monday escalated the GOP's battle with the FBI after its decision in July not to recommend criminal charges against Clinton for her use of the private email system by serving a top FBI official with a subpoena for the full case file. Chaffetz and other Republicans on the panel said the bureau has withheld summaries of interviews with witnesses and unnecessarily blacked out material from documents sent last month.

“We are entitled to the full file," he said.

Dismissing the "emergency" hearing held late on a Monday, Cummings said: "As far as I can tell, the only `emergency' is that the election is less than two months away."

Chaffetz issued the subpoena to Jason Herring, the acting assistant FBI director for congressional affairs. Herring and six other Obama administration officials appeared before the committee to discuss the investigative files. The witnesses on several occasions said they could not answer the questions from lawmakers in an open forum.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/09/13/clinton-it-expert-ignores-subpoena-skips-house-hearing-other-witnesses-plead-5th.html

Wow..

TheGrinch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5029
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #652 on: September 13, 2016, 11:57:57 AM »
Sorry but if you are in any way related to or in public service you shouldn't be allowed to plead the 5th..

"We The People" have a right to everything.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39435
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #653 on: September 14, 2016, 12:19:14 PM »
Clinton granted two more weeks to respond to email questions in court case
The Hill ^ | 09/14/16 | Julian Hattem
Posted on 09/14/2016 11:40:20 AM PDT by detective

Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton has been granted a two-week extension to respond to a series of written questions about her use of a personal email server while secretary of State as part of a court case probing whether the system thwarted open records law.

Clinton’s legal team asked the conservative watchdog organization involved in the lawsuit, Judicial Watch, for the extra time last week, due to her obligations for the presidential campaign and the unavailability of lawyers, among other reasons.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


Skeletor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15669
  • Silence you furry fool!
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #654 on: September 14, 2016, 12:25:12 PM »
Clinton granted two more weeks to respond to email questions in court case
The Hill ^ | 09/14/16 | Julian Hattem
Posted on 09/14/2016 11:40:20 AM PDT by detective

Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton has been granted a two-week extension to respond to a series of written questions about her use of a personal email server while secretary of State as part of a court case probing whether the system thwarted open records law.

Clinton’s legal team asked the conservative watchdog organization involved in the lawsuit, Judicial Watch, for the extra time last week, due to her obligations for the presidential campaign and the unavailability of lawyers, among other reasons.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...



Should not have been granted the extension, she had plenty of time to respond and plenty of lawyers including Cheryl Mills. Moreover, the questions should've been answered already. But her reply will probably be "I can't recall" again or "the others did too" or "someone told me it's ok".

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63756
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #655 on: September 21, 2016, 10:47:26 AM »
Clinton email wiper appears to have asked online how to hide 'VIP' info
By Maxim Lott 
Published September 20, 2016 
FoxNews.com

Archived comments unearthed by citizen-detectives on Reddit indicate that Paul Combetta -- the tech specialist who deleted Hillary Clinton’s emails from her server -- may have sought advice on the website for how to hide a certain “VIP’s” email address.

One archived comment from July 24, 2014 – during the same month that the State Department first asked Clinton aide Cheryl Mills to turn over the former secretary of state’s work-related emails from her personal server – shows Reddit user “stonetear” asking others on the site:

“Hello all- I may be facing a very interesting situation where I need to strip out a VIP's (VERY VIP) email address from a bunch of archived email… Does anyone have experience with something like this, and/or suggestions on how this might be accomplished?”

Multiple Reddit users at the time responded that it was not possible, saying Microsoft does not include an option to change addresses on existing emails because altering them could be used by people to evade court-ordered discovery procedures.

One wrote: “[If Microsoft Exchange] allowed this, it could result in major legal issues. There may be ways to hack a solution, but I am not aware of any.”

User “stonetear” responded: “The issue is that these emails involve the private email address of someone you'd recognize, and we're trying to replace it with a placeholder address as to not expose it.”

Reddit user “stonetear” appears to be a username used by Paul Combetta, the tech specialist with Platte River Networks who ultimately deleted Clinton’s emails and reportedly has received immunity from the Justice Department. Reddit users typically do not link real names to their accounts, but the website Etsy shows the profile “stonetear,” created in 2011, is registered to the name Paul Combetta. The email address stonetear@gmail.com is also linked to Combetta’s name, and the domain name combetta.com is registered under that email.

The connections have caught the attention of Capitol Hill. Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., told The Hill that the House oversight committee is now reviewing the Reddit posts.

The “stonetear” Reddit user frequently asked for and gave tech advice regarding servers over the years.

On Monday, as users on Reddit uncovered the old comments asking for tech advice, user “stonetear” began deleting every one of his comments and posts – but not before other Reddit users managed to archive them using the website “archive.is,” which allows anyone to archive a webpage (the archived page is then hosted on archive.is indefinitely, even if someone later deletes or alters the original.)

On Monday morning, one Reddit poster wrote “He's actually deleting his comments in real tim[e] right here.” Another made a video of the comments being deleted on the screen as he refreshed the page.

User “stonetear” made several comments in 2014 that line up with the Clinton scandal timeline.

According to the FBI report on Clinton’s email issues, Clinton aide Mills told the FBI that Hillary Clinton decided in December 2014 that she did not need emails older than 60 days, and Mills asked someone to implement that. The name of the person she asked was redacted by the FBI but later determined by The New York Times to be Paul Combetta.

“Stonetear” posted on Reddit that same month – on Dec. 10, 2014 – asking about how to set up a server which would automatically delete all emails after 60 days:

“I have a client who wants to push out a 60 day email retention policy for certain users. However, they also want these users to have a 'Save Folder' in their Exchange folder… All email in any other folder in the mailbox should purge anything older than 60 days… How would I go about this?”

Nobody on Reddit responded to stonetear’s question.

The FBI report notes that in late March, the person the Times identified as Combetta realized he had in fact failed to implement the 60-day deletion policy as requested: “In a follow-up FBI interview… he believed he had an ‘oh shit’ moment and sometime between March 25-31, 2015 deleted the Clinton archive mailbox.”

The FBI report goes on to note he also used “Bleachbit” to make sure some backups were permanently deleted, and that several different backups were deleted at that time.

Combetta was reportedly granted immunity in exchange for answering their questions. However, when asked questions by Congress, Combetta invoked his Fifth Amendment rights and declined to answer their questions.

Platte River Networks, where Paul Combetta worked, declined to comment to FoxNews.com and declined to comment about whether Combetta still works there. An email to Combetta’s address went unreturned Tuesday.

Other postings from “stonetear,” meanwhile, indicate he isn’t a fan of conservatives. On a post titled “Ohio Republican Senator Rob Portman comes out in favor of gay marriage after son comes out as gay,” “stonetear” left this comment:

“Typical of conservatives in general... it's bad or evil or undesirable until it happens in their own family/life/neighborhood.”

Another post shows him asking for programming code that would automatically delete thousands of emails from a server. That post was from Aug. 26, 2013 – almost two years before Combetta actually deleted Clinton’s emails but just three months after the Clintons had hired the company Combetta worked for to run their server.

In another comment on Oct. 14, 2014, Combetta responded to another user who had asked about a server problem they were having by suggesting their error may be due to someone on their server trying to hide something:

“This is probably diving into paranoia,” he said, before going into his theory about their problem. “Just thinking outside the box. Plus I like devious shit like this :)” he wrote.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/09/20/clinton-email-wiper-appears-to-have-asked-online-how-to-hide-vip-info.html

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #656 on: September 21, 2016, 10:54:50 AM »
lol there are like 75 smoking guns on hilary email at this point.

James

  • Guest
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #657 on: September 21, 2016, 11:21:11 AM »
Clinton email wiper appears to have asked online how to hide 'VIP' info
By Maxim Lott 
Published September 20, 2016 
FoxNews.com

Archived comments unearthed by citizen-detectives on Reddit indicate that Paul Combetta -- the tech specialist who deleted Hillary Clinton’s emails from her server -- may have sought advice on the website for how to hide a certain “VIP’s” email address.

One archived comment from July 24, 2014 – during the same month that the State Department first asked Clinton aide Cheryl Mills to turn over the former secretary of state’s work-related emails from her personal server – shows Reddit user “stonetear” asking others on the site:

“Hello all- I may be facing a very interesting situation where I need to strip out a VIP's (VERY VIP) email address from a bunch of archived email… Does anyone have experience with something like this, and/or suggestions on how this might be accomplished?”

Multiple Reddit users at the time responded that it was not possible, saying Microsoft does not include an option to change addresses on existing emails because altering them could be used by people to evade court-ordered discovery procedures.

One wrote: “[If Microsoft Exchange] allowed this, it could result in major legal issues. There may be ways to hack a solution, but I am not aware of any.”

User “stonetear” responded: “The issue is that these emails involve the private email address of someone you'd recognize, and we're trying to replace it with a placeholder address as to not expose it.”

Reddit user “stonetear” appears to be a username used by Paul Combetta, the tech specialist with Platte River Networks who ultimately deleted Clinton’s emails and reportedly has received immunity from the Justice Department. Reddit users typically do not link real names to their accounts, but the website Etsy shows the profile “stonetear,” created in 2011, is registered to the name Paul Combetta. The email address stonetear@gmail.com is also linked to Combetta’s name, and the domain name combetta.com is registered under that email.

The connections have caught the attention of Capitol Hill. Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., told The Hill that the House oversight committee is now reviewing the Reddit posts.

The “stonetear” Reddit user frequently asked for and gave tech advice regarding servers over the years.

On Monday, as users on Reddit uncovered the old comments asking for tech advice, user “stonetear” began deleting every one of his comments and posts – but not before other Reddit users managed to archive them using the website “archive.is,” which allows anyone to archive a webpage (the archived page is then hosted on archive.is indefinitely, even if someone later deletes or alters the original.)

On Monday morning, one Reddit poster wrote “He's actually deleting his comments in real tim[e] right here.” Another made a video of the comments being deleted on the screen as he refreshed the page.

User “stonetear” made several comments in 2014 that line up with the Clinton scandal timeline.

According to the FBI report on Clinton’s email issues, Clinton aide Mills told the FBI that Hillary Clinton decided in December 2014 that she did not need emails older than 60 days, and Mills asked someone to implement that. The name of the person she asked was redacted by the FBI but later determined by The New York Times to be Paul Combetta.

“Stonetear” posted on Reddit that same month – on Dec. 10, 2014 – asking about how to set up a server which would automatically delete all emails after 60 days:

“I have a client who wants to push out a 60 day email retention policy for certain users. However, they also want these users to have a 'Save Folder' in their Exchange folder… All email in any other folder in the mailbox should purge anything older than 60 days… How would I go about this?”

Nobody on Reddit responded to stonetear’s question.

The FBI report notes that in late March, the person the Times identified as Combetta realized he had in fact failed to implement the 60-day deletion policy as requested: “In a follow-up FBI interview… he believed he had an ‘oh shit’ moment and sometime between March 25-31, 2015 deleted the Clinton archive mailbox.”

The FBI report goes on to note he also used “Bleachbit” to make sure some backups were permanently deleted, and that several different backups were deleted at that time.

Combetta was reportedly granted immunity in exchange for answering their questions. However, when asked questions by Congress, Combetta invoked his Fifth Amendment rights and declined to answer their questions.

Platte River Networks, where Paul Combetta worked, declined to comment to FoxNews.com and declined to comment about whether Combetta still works there. An email to Combetta’s address went unreturned Tuesday.

Other postings from “stonetear,” meanwhile, indicate he isn’t a fan of conservatives. On a post titled “Ohio Republican Senator Rob Portman comes out in favor of gay marriage after son comes out as gay,” “stonetear” left this comment:

“Typical of conservatives in general... it's bad or evil or undesirable until it happens in their own family/life/neighborhood.”

Another post shows him asking for programming code that would automatically delete thousands of emails from a server. That post was from Aug. 26, 2013 – almost two years before Combetta actually deleted Clinton’s emails but just three months after the Clintons had hired the company Combetta worked for to run their server.

In another comment on Oct. 14, 2014, Combetta responded to another user who had asked about a server problem they were having by suggesting their error may be due to someone on their server trying to hide something:

“This is probably diving into paranoia,” he said, before going into his theory about their problem. “Just thinking outside the box. Plus I like devious shit like this :)” he wrote.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/09/20/clinton-email-wiper-appears-to-have-asked-online-how-to-hide-vip-info.html


Skeletor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15669
  • Silence you furry fool!
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #658 on: September 23, 2016, 03:17:05 PM »
Most of Clinton’s Recovered Emails Will Be Released After Election Day
Group seeking Clinton emails calls process ‘absolutely corrupt’

http://www.wsj.com/articles/most-of-clintons-recovered-emails-will-be-released-after-election-day-1474650119

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #659 on: September 23, 2016, 03:56:09 PM »
Lol at calling it corrupt because they can't use stolen property to help them politically.

polychronopolous

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19041
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #660 on: September 23, 2016, 04:03:28 PM »
Lol at calling it corrupt because they can't use stolen property to help them politically.

 :D

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39435
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #661 on: September 23, 2016, 05:16:26 PM »
Most of Clinton’s Recovered Emails Will Be Released After Election Day
Group seeking Clinton emails calls process ‘absolutely corrupt’

http://www.wsj.com/articles/most-of-clintons-recovered-emails-will-be-released-after-election-day-1474650119


Ridiculous

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63756
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #662 on: September 28, 2016, 10:58:42 AM »
Comey: Cheryl Mills' laptop contained 'some' classified information
Published September 28, 2016 
FoxNews.com

FBI Director James Comey testified Wednesday that former Hillary Clinton chief of staff Cheryl Mills and another top aide had “some” classified material on laptops they turned over to the bureau in its probe of Clinton's private server use as secretary of state -- yet the aides still received immunity.

Comey made the acknowledgment while testifying before the House Judiciary Committee, where Republicans had tough questions about a newly revealed set of immunity deals in the Clinton case.

The director claimed the findings did not constitute a crime but declined to directly answer a question on whether having classified material on a laptop or other private electronic device was against federal regulations.

“You’d have to know the circumstances,” Comey told committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Va.

Details about Mills and agency lawyer Heather Samuelson being granted immunity were first reported last week.

GOP lawmakers fumed at Wednesday's hearing that the bureau was too lax with those arrangements. Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., lamented what he called the "DOJ immunity-producing machine," though Comey disagreed with that assessment.

Committee member Louie Gohmert, a Texas Republican and former judge, asked Comey on Wednesday how and why Mills and Samuelson were granted immunity when investigators suspected they, like Clinton, had mishandled classified electronic information.

“You granted immunity to people you needed to make a case, if a case was going to be made?” Gohmert asked.

Comey explained that part of the process includes a “queen for a day” procedure in which investigators talk to witnesses or potential witnesses to hear what they might say when testifying before deciding on whether to grant immunity.

The presidential campaign for Clinton, the Democratic nominee, has defended the so-called “limited immunity,” saying it’s “fairly routine" in such investigations.

Comey on Wednesday referred to the deal as “act of production” immunity and said it assures those who cooperate that anything uncovered in their files outside the scope of the investigation cannot be used against them.

Comey also said the immunity was granted by the Justice Department. He called the immunity deal “fairly common” and suggested that Mills’ lawyer asked for the protection.

The FBI’s two-year investigation into the private server found numerous Clinton server emails contained classified information and she was “extremely careless.”

However, the agency concluded the investigation without recommending criminal prosecution, and the Justice Department closed the case this summer.

"It seems clear that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton committed multiple felonies involving the passing of classified information through her private email server. The FBI, however, declined to refer the case for prosecution on some very questionable bases," Goodlatte said Wednesday. "We, as Congress and the American people, are troubled how such gross negligence is not punished."

Mills’ testimony in the FBI investigation and potential testimony before Congress was not covered in the immunity deal.

Five people were granted some form of immunity in the case including Mills, Samuelson, and former agency IT specialist Bryan Pagliano.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/09/28/comey-cheryl-mills-laptop-contained-some-classified-information.html

Skeletor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15669
  • Silence you furry fool!
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #663 on: September 28, 2016, 12:07:40 PM »

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39435
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #664 on: September 29, 2016, 04:43:00 AM »
Entire thing was a sham

Comey: Cheryl Mills' laptop contained 'some' classified information
Published September 28, 2016 
FoxNews.com

FBI Director James Comey testified Wednesday that former Hillary Clinton chief of staff Cheryl Mills and another top aide had “some” classified material on laptops they turned over to the bureau in its probe of Clinton's private server use as secretary of state -- yet the aides still received immunity.

Comey made the acknowledgment while testifying before the House Judiciary Committee, where Republicans had tough questions about a newly revealed set of immunity deals in the Clinton case.

The director claimed the findings did not constitute a crime but declined to directly answer a question on whether having classified material on a laptop or other private electronic device was against federal regulations.

“You’d have to know the circumstances,” Comey told committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Va.

Details about Mills and agency lawyer Heather Samuelson being granted immunity were first reported last week.

GOP lawmakers fumed at Wednesday's hearing that the bureau was too lax with those arrangements. Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., lamented what he called the "DOJ immunity-producing machine," though Comey disagreed with that assessment.

Committee member Louie Gohmert, a Texas Republican and former judge, asked Comey on Wednesday how and why Mills and Samuelson were granted immunity when investigators suspected they, like Clinton, had mishandled classified electronic information.

“You granted immunity to people you needed to make a case, if a case was going to be made?” Gohmert asked.

Comey explained that part of the process includes a “queen for a day” procedure in which investigators talk to witnesses or potential witnesses to hear what they might say when testifying before deciding on whether to grant immunity.

The presidential campaign for Clinton, the Democratic nominee, has defended the so-called “limited immunity,” saying it’s “fairly routine" in such investigations.

Comey on Wednesday referred to the deal as “act of production” immunity and said it assures those who cooperate that anything uncovered in their files outside the scope of the investigation cannot be used against them.

Comey also said the immunity was granted by the Justice Department. He called the immunity deal “fairly common” and suggested that Mills’ lawyer asked for the protection.

The FBI’s two-year investigation into the private server found numerous Clinton server emails contained classified information and she was “extremely careless.”

However, the agency concluded the investigation without recommending criminal prosecution, and the Justice Department closed the case this summer.

"It seems clear that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton committed multiple felonies involving the passing of classified information through her private email server. The FBI, however, declined to refer the case for prosecution on some very questionable bases," Goodlatte said Wednesday. "We, as Congress and the American people, are troubled how such gross negligence is not punished."

Mills’ testimony in the FBI investigation and potential testimony before Congress was not covered in the immunity deal.

Five people were granted some form of immunity in the case including Mills, Samuelson, and former agency IT specialist Bryan Pagliano.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/09/28/comey-cheryl-mills-laptop-contained-some-classified-information.html

Yamcha

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13292
  • Fundie
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #665 on: September 29, 2016, 05:20:34 AM »
Funny how things seem to disappear around the Clintons.

Take a look at the Wiki page for that fat "mrs piggy" over the past few days. Wiki has altered/locked the page to reflect the MSM narrative.

http://archive.is/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alicia_Machado
a

Yamcha

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13292
  • Fundie
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #666 on: September 30, 2016, 08:21:12 AM »
Top central banker's Clinton donation puts Fed in political crosshairs

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/09/29/top-central-banker-clinton-donation-puts-fed-in-political-crosshairs.html

It's good to see the people over at the Fed Reserve are staying out of partisan politics.  ::)

AUDIT THE FED! Put Ron Paul in charge of it too!
a

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63756
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #667 on: October 03, 2016, 12:29:34 PM »
FBI agreed to destroy laptops of Clinton aides with immunity deal, sources say
Published October 03, 2016
FoxNews.com

Immunity deals for two top Hillary Clinton aides included a side arrangement obliging the FBI to destroy their laptops after reviewing the devices, House Judiciary Committee sources told Fox News on Monday.

Sources said the arrangement with former Clinton chief of staff Cheryl Mills and ex-campaign staffer Heather Samuelson also limited the search to no later than Jan. 31, 2015. This meant investigators could not review documents for the period after the email server became public -- in turn preventing the bureau from discovering if there was any evidence of obstruction of justice, sources said. 

The Republican-led House Judiciary Committee fired off a letter Monday to Attorney General Loretta Lynch asking why the DOJ and FBI agreed to the restrictive terms, including that the FBI would destroy the laptops after finishing the search.

“Like many things about this case, these new materials raise more questions than answers,” Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., wrote in the letter obtained by Fox News.

“Doesn’t the willingness of Ms. Mills and Ms. Samuelson to have their laptops destroyed by the FBI contradict their claim that the laptops could have been withheld because they contained non-relevant, privileged information? If so, doesn’t that undermine the claim that the side agreements were necessary?” Goodlatte asks.

The immunity deals for Mills and Samuelson, made as part of the FBI’s probe into Clinton’s use of a private email server when she served as secretary of state, apparently included a series of “side agreements” that were negotiated by Samuelson and Mills’ attorney Beth Wilkinson.

The side deals were agreed to on June 10, less than a month before FBI Director James Comey announced that the agency would recommend no charges be brought against Clinton or her staff.

Judiciary Committee aides told FoxNews.com that the destruction of the laptops is particularly troubling as it means that the computers could not be used as evidence in future legal proceedings, should new information or circumstances arise.

Committee aides also asked why the FBI and DOJ would enter into a voluntary negotiation to begin with, when the laptops could be obtained condition-free via a subpoena.

The letter also asked why the DOJ agreed to limit their search of the laptops to files before Jan. 31, 2015, which would “give up any opportunity to find evidence related to the destruction of evidence or obstruction of justice related to Secretary Clinton’s unauthorized use of a private email server during her tenure as Secretary of State.”

Aides expressed shock at the parameter, saying it is especially troubling as Mills and Samuelson already had immunity from the consequences of whatever might be on the laptop.

“You’re essentially extending immunity to everyone,” one aide said.

The letter to Lynch sought to determine how many documents were blocked from FBI investigators because they fell outside of the date range agreed to by the DOJ.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/03/fbi-agreed-to-destroy-laptops-clinton-aides-with-immunity-deal-sources-say.html

Skeletor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15669
  • Silence you furry fool!
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #668 on: October 03, 2016, 12:35:08 PM »
FBI agreed to destroy laptops of Clinton aides with immunity deal, sources say
Published October 03, 2016
FoxNews.com

Immunity deals for two top Hillary Clinton aides included a side arrangement obliging the FBI to destroy their laptops after reviewing the devices, House Judiciary Committee sources told Fox News on Monday.

Sources said the arrangement with former Clinton chief of staff Cheryl Mills and ex-campaign staffer Heather Samuelson also limited the search to no later than Jan. 31, 2015. This meant investigators could not review documents for the period after the email server became public -- in turn preventing the bureau from discovering if there was any evidence of obstruction of justice, sources said.  

The Republican-led House Judiciary Committee fired off a letter Monday to Attorney General Loretta Lynch asking why the DOJ and FBI agreed to the restrictive terms, including that the FBI would destroy the laptops after finishing the search.

“Like many things about this case, these new materials raise more questions than answers,” Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., wrote in the letter obtained by Fox News.

“Doesn’t the willingness of Ms. Mills and Ms. Samuelson to have their laptops destroyed by the FBI contradict their claim that the laptops could have been withheld because they contained non-relevant, privileged information? If so, doesn’t that undermine the claim that the side agreements were necessary?” Goodlatte asks.

The immunity deals for Mills and Samuelson, made as part of the FBI’s probe into Clinton’s use of a private email server when she served as secretary of state, apparently included a series of “side agreements” that were negotiated by Samuelson and Mills’ attorney Beth Wilkinson.

The side deals were agreed to on June 10, less than a month before FBI Director James Comey announced that the agency would recommend no charges be brought against Clinton or her staff.

Judiciary Committee aides told FoxNews.com that the destruction of the laptops is particularly troubling as it means that the computers could not be used as evidence in future legal proceedings, should new information or circumstances arise.

Committee aides also asked why the FBI and DOJ would enter into a voluntary negotiation to begin with, when the laptops could be obtained condition-free via a subpoena.

The letter also asked why the DOJ agreed to limit their search of the laptops to files before Jan. 31, 2015, which would “give up any opportunity to find evidence related to the destruction of evidence or obstruction of justice related to Secretary Clinton’s unauthorized use of a private email server during her tenure as Secretary of State.”

Aides expressed shock at the parameter, saying it is especially troubling as Mills and Samuelson already had immunity from the consequences of whatever might be on the laptop.

“You’re essentially extending immunity to everyone,” one aide said.

The letter to Lynch sought to determine how many documents were blocked from FBI investigators because they fell outside of the date range agreed to by the DOJ.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/03/fbi-agreed-to-destroy-laptops-clinton-aides-with-immunity-deal-sources-say.html

So what sort of "investigation" is this where many of those involved are granted immunity, persons of interest become lawyers for involved parties and can be present in hearings and interviews of others and evidence is destroyed? This sounds more like a coverup than a thorough investigation in a case that centers around major integrity concerns, public corruption as well as national security issues.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63756
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #669 on: October 03, 2016, 12:36:50 PM »
Does not pass the smell test.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63756
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #670 on: October 04, 2016, 02:02:28 PM »
Author: AG Lynch Had 'Secret' Meetings at White House About Email Probe
Oct 04, 2016 // 10:31am     
As seen on Fox & Friends

Ed Klein, author of Guilty as Sin, said on Fox & Friends that Attorney General Loretta Lynch was going to the White House for "secret" meetings to keep the president up to date on the FBI investigation into Hillary Clinton's private email server.

He said that despite assurances to the public that the FBI would be conducting an independent investigation, Lynch was working with the White House on a "strategy" to make sure the former secretary of state would not face charges.

"[Lynch] was secretly going to the White House with FBI documents and filling in Valerie Jarrett and the President about what was going on so that they could get a strategy to make sure that [Clinton] would not be indicted," said Klein, citing sources inside the Obama administration, others that were in the Clinton administration and sources "very close to" Jarrett, Obama's top adviser.

Klein explained that originally, Obama wanted all documents concerning Clinton's emails to be turned over to the FBI and wanted her to face indictment so that Joe Biden or Elizabeth Warren could become the Democratic nominee.

"[Obama] and Bill Clinton are blood feud guys. They really dislike each other and his feeling was if the Clintons got in the White House, the Obamas would be marginalized," said Klein, adding that Obama changed course when he realized he was "stuck with" Clinton as the nominee against Donald Trump.

Klein was then asked about Clinton's health in light of her recent bout of pneumonia and a near-collapse in public following a 9/11 commemoration.

According to his sources, Klein said Mrs. Clinton suffers from a heart valve problem that hasn't been corrected because she did not want health questions to dog her presidential run.

"She has a tendency, as we all know, to blood clot, so if she faints because of her low blood pressure and hits her head, she could have a blood clot that could be fatal," he added.

Watch the interview above and past Fox News appearances by Ed Klein, here.

http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/10/04/author-ed-klein-ag-lynch-had-secret-meetings-white-house-about-email-probe

Skeletor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15669
  • Silence you furry fool!
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #671 on: October 04, 2016, 02:25:28 PM »
Author: AG Lynch Had 'Secret' Meetings at White House About Email Probe
Oct 04, 2016 // 10:31am     
As seen on Fox & Friends

Ed Klein, author of Guilty as Sin, said on Fox & Friends that Attorney General Loretta Lynch was going to the White House for "secret" meetings to keep the president up to date on the FBI investigation into Hillary Clinton's private email server.

He said that despite assurances to the public that the FBI would be conducting an independent investigation, Lynch was working with the White House on a "strategy" to make sure the former secretary of state would not face charges.

"[Lynch] was secretly going to the White House with FBI documents and filling in Valerie Jarrett and the President about what was going on so that they could get a strategy to make sure that [Clinton] would not be indicted," said Klein, citing sources inside the Obama administration, others that were in the Clinton administration and sources "very close to" Jarrett, Obama's top adviser.

Klein explained that originally, Obama wanted all documents concerning Clinton's emails to be turned over to the FBI and wanted her to face indictment so that Joe Biden or Elizabeth Warren could become the Democratic nominee.

"[Obama] and Bill Clinton are blood feud guys. They really dislike each other and his feeling was if the Clintons got in the White House, the Obamas would be marginalized," said Klein, adding that Obama changed course when he realized he was "stuck with" Clinton as the nominee against Donald Trump.

Klein was then asked about Clinton's health in light of her recent bout of pneumonia and a near-collapse in public following a 9/11 commemoration.

According to his sources, Klein said Mrs. Clinton suffers from a heart valve problem that hasn't been corrected because she did not want health questions to dog her presidential run.

"She has a tendency, as we all know, to blood clot, so if she faints because of her low blood pressure and hits her head, she could have a blood clot that could be fatal," he added.

Watch the interview above and past Fox News appearances by Ed Klein, here.

http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/10/04/author-ed-klein-ag-lynch-had-secret-meetings-white-house-about-email-probe

Outrageous.

So who would investigate Lynch in this case? The FBI? And if there was a case for her prosecution, who would prosecute her?

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63756
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #672 on: October 04, 2016, 02:47:31 PM »
Outrageous.

So who would investigate Lynch in this case? The FBI? And if there was a case for her prosecution, who would prosecute her?

I would imagine it would have to be a special prosecutor appointed by either the President or Congress?

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39435
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #673 on: October 04, 2016, 06:40:30 PM »
Politico just ran a story about ofagget dropping charges on lybian arms dealer in Bemghazi.    Sickening.    F Obama and Hillary.   Two terrorist scum bags

Yamcha

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13292
  • Fundie
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #674 on: October 05, 2016, 04:18:19 AM »
Glad the Republicans have control of the House and the Senate! They will keep Obama in check!  ::)

This is outrageous. To hell with them all.  :-X
a