Author Topic: Is Hillary Hiding Something  (Read 117962 times)

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39372
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #700 on: August 30, 2017, 05:36:32 PM »

More like FBI doesn't want to be exposed

At first they came up with "extremely careless", then they claimed "no records were found" for the Clinton-Lynch meeting (even though somehow they later discovered records) and now they cite a supposed "lack of public interest".

FBI shuts down request for files on Hillary Clinton by citing lack of public interest

By Alex Pappas Published August 29, 2017 Fox News
 
Why the FBI shut down a Hillary Clinton email request
The FBI is declining to turn over files related to its investigation of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s emails by arguing a lack of public interest in the matter.

Ty Clevenger, an attorney in New York City, filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request in March of 2016 asking for a variety of documents from the FBI and the Justice Department, including correspondence exchanged with Congress about the Clinton email investigation.

But in a letter sent this week and obtained by Fox News, the head of the FBI’s Records Management Division told Clevenger that the bureau has “determined you have not sufficiently demonstrated that the public’s interest in disclosure outweighs personal privacy interests of the subject.”

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/08/29/fbi-shuts-down-request-for-files-on-hillary-clinton-by-citing-lack-public-interest.html

Skeletor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15617
  • Silence you furry fool!
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #701 on: August 31, 2017, 01:10:58 PM »
Comey began drafting 'exoneration statement' before interviewing Clinton, senators say

By Alex Pappas Published August 31, 2017 Fox News

Then-FBI Director James Comey began drafting a statement exonerating Hillary Clinton in the investigation into her private email use before interviewing key witnesses, including Clinton herself, two Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee said Thursday.

“Conclusion first, fact-gathering second—that’s no way to run an investigation,” Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley and South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham wrote in a letter this week to the FBI. “The FBI should be held to a higher standard than that, especially in a matter of such great public interest and controversy.”

Grassley and Graham said they learned about Comey’s draft "exoneration statement" after reviewing transcripts of interviews with top Comey aides.

“According to the unredacted portions of the transcripts, it appears that in April or early May of 2016, Mr. Comey had already decided he would issue a statement exonerating Secretary Clinton,” the senators said.

They added, “That was long before FBI agents finished their work. Mr. Comey even circulated an early draft statement to select members of senior FBI leadership. The outcome of an investigation should not be prejudged while FBI agents are still hard at work trying to gather the facts.”

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/08/31/comey-began-drafting-exoneration-statement-before-interviewing-clinton-senators-say.html

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39372
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #702 on: August 31, 2017, 01:15:26 PM »
Not surprising.   :(

Comey began drafting 'exoneration statement' before interviewing Clinton, senators say

By Alex Pappas Published August 31, 2017 Fox News

Then-FBI Director James Comey began drafting a statement exonerating Hillary Clinton in the investigation into her private email use before interviewing key witnesses, including Clinton herself, two Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee said Thursday.

“Conclusion first, fact-gathering second—that’s no way to run an investigation,” Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley and South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham wrote in a letter this week to the FBI. “The FBI should be held to a higher standard than that, especially in a matter of such great public interest and controversy.”

Grassley and Graham said they learned about Comey’s draft "exoneration statement" after reviewing transcripts of interviews with top Comey aides.

“According to the unredacted portions of the transcripts, it appears that in April or early May of 2016, Mr. Comey had already decided he would issue a statement exonerating Secretary Clinton,” the senators said.

They added, “That was long before FBI agents finished their work. Mr. Comey even circulated an early draft statement to select members of senior FBI leadership. The outcome of an investigation should not be prejudged while FBI agents are still hard at work trying to gather the facts.”

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/08/31/comey-began-drafting-exoneration-statement-before-interviewing-clinton-senators-say.html

Skeletor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15617
  • Silence you furry fool!
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #703 on: September 01, 2017, 12:36:08 PM »
'A Lot of Explaining to Do': Chaffetz Says Comey May Have Perjured Himself

Jason Chaffetz said former FBI Director James Comey has a lot of "explaining to do" in light of new reports that he began drafting a statement exonerating Hillary Clinton even before interviewing key witnesses, including the former secretary of state.

"He's certainly got a lot of explaining to do. He could have perjured himself," the former House oversight committee chairman said on "Fox & Friends."

http://insider.foxnews.com/2017/09/01/james-comey-may-have-committed-perjury-chaffetz-says


Princess L

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13095
  • I stop for turtles
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #705 on: September 06, 2017, 06:06:00 AM »
:

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39372
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39372
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #707 on: October 16, 2017, 09:49:46 AM »

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63696
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #708 on: May 16, 2019, 01:28:40 PM »
EMAILS SHOW OBAMA COVERED UP HILLARY SCANDAL
President was protecting his 'heir apparent'

Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama at the White House (HillaryClinton.com)

The Obama White House knew about the Hillary Clinton classified-information scandal earlier than previously admitted and tried to cover it up, according to emails obtained by Judicial Watch.

The documents, obtained from the State Department through court-ordered discovery, “suggest the Obama White House knew about the Clinton email lies being told to the public at least as early as December 2012,” the watchdog group said.

A federal court granted Judicial Watch discovery into the Clinton emails “because the court wanted answers about a government cover-up of the Clinton emails.”

“And now we have answers, because it looks like the Obama White House orchestrated the Clinton email cover-up,” Judicial Watch said.

WND reported in April a senior FBI official, E.W. Priestap, admitted under oath the bureau found emails sent from Clinton’s unsecured server in President Obama’s executive office in the White House.

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said at the time that the confirmation made under oath showed that the
Obama FBI had to go to President Obama’s White House office “to find emails that Hillary Clinton tried to destroy or hide from the American people.”

Fitton was referring to the more than 30,000 emails under subpoena that were thoroughly deleted through an application called BleachBit by order of Clinton’s State Department team.

When then FBI Director James Comey announced in July 2016 that the FBI had decided not to refer criminal charges in the case, he nevertheless said Clinton had been “extremely careless” in her handling of classified information.

More than 100 emails on her server contained classified information, including 65 emails deemed “Secret” and 22 “Top Secret.” Another 2,093 emails were retroactively marked classified by the State Department.

Heir apparent

Regarding the latest revelation, Judicial Watch noted Clinton was Obama’s “heir apparent to the White House, “and in addition to protecting her from the inquiry into her unsecured email, Obama’s Justice Department spied on Donald Trump’s campaign.”

In 2012, months after the Obama White House got involved in the email scandal, Judicial Watch said, the State Department responded to the group requesting the information, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, by “falsely stating that no such records existed.”

In a Dec. 20, 2012, email with the subject line “Need to track down a FOIA request from CREW,” Sheryl L. Walter, director of the State Department’s Office of Information Programs and Services, wrote to IPS officials Rosemary D. Reid and Patrick D. Scholl and their assistants:

WH called – have we received a FOIA request from CREW (Citizens for Responsible Ethics in Washington) on the topic of personal use of email by senior officials? Apparently other agencies have. If we have it, can you give me the details so I can call the WH back? I think they’d like it on quick turnaround. Thanks! Sheryl

In the same email chain, Walter, on Dec. 20, 2012, also emailed Heather Samuelson, Clinton’s White House liaison, describing the CREW FOIA request:

Hi Heather – Copy attached, it was in our significant weekly FOIA report that we send to L and S/ES also. Do you want us to add you to that list? It’s a subset of things like this that we think likely to be of broader Department interest. More detail below re this request. As a practical matter given our workload, it won’t be processed for some months. Let me know if there are any particular sensitivities. If we don’t talk later, happy holidays! All the best, Sheryl

Sheryl: The request is assigned Case #F-2012-40981. It was received on 12/6/2012 and acknowledged on 12/10/2012. The request is assigned for processing.

On Jan. 10, 2013, Walter wrote to Samuelson saying she is not including “personal” accounts in the FOIA request search:

Hi Heather – did you ever get any intell re what other agencies are doing re this FOIA request that seeks records about the number of email accounts associated with the Secretary (but isn’t specifying “personal” email accounts so we are interpreting as official accounts only). We are considering contacting the requester to find out exactly what it is they are looking for. Do you have any-concerns about that approach?

Soon afterward, Samuelson responds: “White House Counsel was looking into this for me. I will circle back with them now to see if they have further guidance.”

CREW’s general counsel, Anne Weismann, submitted a FOIA request to the State Department on Dec. 6, 2012, seeking “records sufficient to show the number of email accounts of or associated with Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton, and the extent to which those email accounts are identifiable as those of or associated with Secretary Clinton.”

On May 10, 2013, [Information Programs and Services] replied to CREW, stating that “no records responsive to your request were located.”

Judge: ‘One of the gravest modern offenses’

Judicial Watch said its discovery is centered on whether or not Clinton intentionally attempted to evade the Freedom of Information Act by using a non-government email system. And it wants to know whether the State Department acted in bad faith in processing its FOIA request for communications from Clinton’s office.

U.S. District Court Judge Royce Lamberth has ordered Obama administration senior State Department officials, lawyers, Clinton aides and FBI official Priestap to be deposed or answer written questions under oath.

The court ruled that the Clinton email system was “one of the gravest modern offenses to government transparency.”

The State Department’s Office of Inspector General issued a report in January 2016 saying that at the time “the request was received, dozens of senior officials throughout the Department, including members of Secretary Clinton’s immediate staff, exchanged emails with the Secretary using the personal accounts she used to conduct official business.’

Also, the inspector general “found evidence that [Clinton Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills] was informed of the request at the time it was received.”

https://www.wnd.com/2019/05/emails-show-obama-covered-up-hillary-scandal/#KUOMK9itOOFkrLb3.99

Skeletor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15617
  • Silence you furry fool!
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #709 on: August 02, 2019, 03:09:15 PM »
New evidence unveils disturbing facts about Hillary's email scandal

In breaking news, the American Center for Law and Justice or ACLJ (Jay Sekulow's organization, not related to his role as the President's attorney), has obtained actual copies of the immunity agreements pertaining to Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson in the Hillary email scandal. This was a stunning litigation win, hard-fought after years of litigation by the ACLJ attorneys, who were unable to extract the documents through the normal FOIA processes, due to a lack of cooperation by the government.  

In reviewing what the agreements uncovered, keep in mind that Cheryl Mills was Secretary Clinton's Chief of Staff at the State Department and then bizarrely, she subsequently served as Clinton’s attorney, representing her in the email scandal.  Heather Samuelson worked on Hillary Clinton's 2008 campaign, and then became a Senior Advisor to her at the State Department, as well as the White House liaison. Somehow, she also became one of Clinton's personal attorneys during the email scandal.

The immunity agreements issued by the government, were crafted so that the agencies could extract information from the parties, despite the fact that this is not necessary because DOJ has the power to require that the information be turned over.  Clinton kept classified emails on a private server in violation of Federal law, and the immunity agreements reveal that both Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson were actively involved in the cover-up of these emails as well as in the destruction of evidence. According to Jordon Sekulow, Executive Director of the ACLJ, it is extremely unusual for someone involved in a criminal cover up, who needs an immunity deal to ensure the evasion of jail time, later becomes the attorney representing the other potential criminal or co-conspirator.

The agreements issued were with DOJ and the FBI. They asserted that Mills and Samuelson would turn over the computers to them, but stipulated that they weren't turning over "custody and control". This critical point is a legal and factual bunch of bunk. The FOIA statute applies to information in the agencies' "custody and control". Anything not in their custody or control cannot be FOIA'd. It is impossible to have an agency physically have a computer and not have it in their "custody or control." Custody and control is not something that suspects have to expressly give over or agree to give over. When they give over the evidence, then obviously, as a matter of fact, they are also giving the agency "custody and control" over that evidence. Suspects cannot withhold "custody and control" by mere words or lack of consent, as consent is not required. In other words, these agreements are extremely flawed and whomever signed off on them should be investigated and perhaps prosecuted.  It is clear that the purpose of this clause was to make the arguably illegal activities of Mills and Samuelson out of the reach of FOIA --- in other words, it would be withheld from the public. This is the very definition of corruption.

Additionally, the immunity agreements were broad in scope. There were numerous charges that the agreements gave them immunity from including potential violations of the Federal Records Act, the Classified Information Act and the Espionage Act. According to the ACLJ, nobody has ever gotten immunity from the Espionage Act before. Normally, immunity is for lesser crimes like obstruction of justice, but not espionage. If Mills and Samuelson were charged and convicted of every crime from which they received immunity, they would be potentially subject to twenty-eight years in jail each.

After Clinton illegally sent classified emails on a private server and cell phones (and by the way, people have gone to jail for this even when they did so accidentally because it's that serious), and after Mills and Samuelson purposely worked to cover up and conceal both the emails and the destruction of evidence, and after they were given a sweetheart deal that nobody in history has ever gotten, they became the attorneys for Clinton, representing her in the email case. This shouldn't be allowed because it is a conflict of interests, and not only gives the appearance of impropriety, but indeed, constitutes actual impropriety.

Subsequently, Mills and Samuelson finally gave the computers over to the FBI, which per their agreements, limited the FBI’s investigation. The FBI agreed to limit a) the method by which the emails investigated would be obtained; b) the scope of files which would be investigated, and c) the timeframe parameters for investigated emails. In other words, the FBI agreed in the immunity contracts not to do a full investigation on the Clinton emails. To make matters worse, again, per the immunity agreements, the FBI agreed to destroy the computers that had the back-up emails.  As Congressman Jim Jordan referenced during the Mueller hearings recently, the FBI used bleachBit to purge the server so the information could never be accessed in the future and used hammers to smash the cell phones involved. In other words, the FBI and DOJ participated in the destruction of the evidence.  In effect, this constitutes is a conspiracy between the Obama DOJ (under Loretta Lynch) and the Comey-led FBI to cover up Clinton’s crimes.  

Shortly thereafter, Comey came out publicly and held a press conference exonerating Clinton from any criminal activity, knowing full well that she was never thoroughly investigated, and that his own agency had participated in the destruction of evidence.

To reiterate Comey’s assertions, he stated that Clinton had been "extremely careless" in her handling of classified and sensitive information, but not "grossly negligent", even though the definition of grossly negligent is extremely careless. Gross negligence is the language in the statute necessary to prosecute someone who does this and Comey inaccurately professed that no prosecutor would pursue a case based on these facts, even though those with lesser evidence have indeed been charged.

Currently, there are investigations taking place pertaining to the Clinton email scandal cover-up, as well as the origins of the Trump investigation by the Mueller team, including the roots of the FISA applications. All of the documents uncovered by the ACLJ’s legal win will constitute valuable evidence for AG Bill Barr, the IG and others. Many who follow what is really going on, on a day to day basis have been repeatedly disappointed in the biased and one-sided investigations and the cover-up or blatant disregard of critical facts implicating the pro-Clinton, anti-Trump teams.  But Bill Barr and his team are fairly new to the process. He and others, including John Durham, will finally have the opportunity to get to the bottom of all this --- and finally disclose the real collusion, corruption, and obstruction. There’s still hope.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/274484/new-evidence-unveils-disturbing-facts-about-deborah-weiss

Irongrip400

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21137
  • Pan Germanism, Pax Britannica
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #710 on: August 02, 2019, 05:27:17 PM »
Let it go, nothing will happen to her. Trump won.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63696
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #711 on: August 02, 2019, 05:58:43 PM »
New evidence unveils disturbing facts about Hillary's email scandal

In breaking news, the American Center for Law and Justice or ACLJ (Jay Sekulow's organization, not related to his role as the President's attorney), has obtained actual copies of the immunity agreements pertaining to Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson in the Hillary email scandal. This was a stunning litigation win, hard-fought after years of litigation by the ACLJ attorneys, who were unable to extract the documents through the normal FOIA processes, due to a lack of cooperation by the government.  

In reviewing what the agreements uncovered, keep in mind that Cheryl Mills was Secretary Clinton's Chief of Staff at the State Department and then bizarrely, she subsequently served as Clinton’s attorney, representing her in the email scandal.  Heather Samuelson worked on Hillary Clinton's 2008 campaign, and then became a Senior Advisor to her at the State Department, as well as the White House liaison. Somehow, she also became one of Clinton's personal attorneys during the email scandal.

The immunity agreements issued by the government, were crafted so that the agencies could extract information from the parties, despite the fact that this is not necessary because DOJ has the power to require that the information be turned over.  Clinton kept classified emails on a private server in violation of Federal law, and the immunity agreements reveal that both Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson were actively involved in the cover-up of these emails as well as in the destruction of evidence. According to Jordon Sekulow, Executive Director of the ACLJ, it is extremely unusual for someone involved in a criminal cover up, who needs an immunity deal to ensure the evasion of jail time, later becomes the attorney representing the other potential criminal or co-conspirator.

The agreements issued were with DOJ and the FBI. They asserted that Mills and Samuelson would turn over the computers to them, but stipulated that they weren't turning over "custody and control". This critical point is a legal and factual bunch of bunk. The FOIA statute applies to information in the agencies' "custody and control". Anything not in their custody or control cannot be FOIA'd. It is impossible to have an agency physically have a computer and not have it in their "custody or control." Custody and control is not something that suspects have to expressly give over or agree to give over. When they give over the evidence, then obviously, as a matter of fact, they are also giving the agency "custody and control" over that evidence. Suspects cannot withhold "custody and control" by mere words or lack of consent, as consent is not required. In other words, these agreements are extremely flawed and whomever signed off on them should be investigated and perhaps prosecuted.  It is clear that the purpose of this clause was to make the arguably illegal activities of Mills and Samuelson out of the reach of FOIA --- in other words, it would be withheld from the public. This is the very definition of corruption.

Additionally, the immunity agreements were broad in scope. There were numerous charges that the agreements gave them immunity from including potential violations of the Federal Records Act, the Classified Information Act and the Espionage Act. According to the ACLJ, nobody has ever gotten immunity from the Espionage Act before. Normally, immunity is for lesser crimes like obstruction of justice, but not espionage. If Mills and Samuelson were charged and convicted of every crime from which they received immunity, they would be potentially subject to twenty-eight years in jail each.

After Clinton illegally sent classified emails on a private server and cell phones (and by the way, people have gone to jail for this even when they did so accidentally because it's that serious), and after Mills and Samuelson purposely worked to cover up and conceal both the emails and the destruction of evidence, and after they were given a sweetheart deal that nobody in history has ever gotten, they became the attorneys for Clinton, representing her in the email case. This shouldn't be allowed because it is a conflict of interests, and not only gives the appearance of impropriety, but indeed, constitutes actual impropriety.

Subsequently, Mills and Samuelson finally gave the computers over to the FBI, which per their agreements, limited the FBI’s investigation. The FBI agreed to limit a) the method by which the emails investigated would be obtained; b) the scope of files which would be investigated, and c) the timeframe parameters for investigated emails. In other words, the FBI agreed in the immunity contracts not to do a full investigation on the Clinton emails. To make matters worse, again, per the immunity agreements, the FBI agreed to destroy the computers that had the back-up emails.  As Congressman Jim Jordan referenced during the Mueller hearings recently, the FBI used bleachBit to purge the server so the information could never be accessed in the future and used hammers to smash the cell phones involved. In other words, the FBI and DOJ participated in the destruction of the evidence.  In effect, this constitutes is a conspiracy between the Obama DOJ (under Loretta Lynch) and the Comey-led FBI to cover up Clinton’s crimes.  

Shortly thereafter, Comey came out publicly and held a press conference exonerating Clinton from any criminal activity, knowing full well that she was never thoroughly investigated, and that his own agency had participated in the destruction of evidence.

To reiterate Comey’s assertions, he stated that Clinton had been "extremely careless" in her handling of classified and sensitive information, but not "grossly negligent", even though the definition of grossly negligent is extremely careless. Gross negligence is the language in the statute necessary to prosecute someone who does this and Comey inaccurately professed that no prosecutor would pursue a case based on these facts, even though those with lesser evidence have indeed been charged.

Currently, there are investigations taking place pertaining to the Clinton email scandal cover-up, as well as the origins of the Trump investigation by the Mueller team, including the roots of the FISA applications. All of the documents uncovered by the ACLJ’s legal win will constitute valuable evidence for AG Bill Barr, the IG and others. Many who follow what is really going on, on a day to day basis have been repeatedly disappointed in the biased and one-sided investigations and the cover-up or blatant disregard of critical facts implicating the pro-Clinton, anti-Trump teams.  But Bill Barr and his team are fairly new to the process. He and others, including John Durham, will finally have the opportunity to get to the bottom of all this --- and finally disclose the real collusion, corruption, and obstruction. There’s still hope.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/274484/new-evidence-unveils-disturbing-facts-about-deborah-weiss


Further proof that the laws apply to us little people.  Makes it even more outrageous that she will not shut up and go away after getting away with breaking the law. 

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39372
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #712 on: December 04, 2019, 09:32:47 AM »
Hillary Clinton Suffers Coughing Spell in Howard Stern Interview
Breitbart ^ | 4 Dec 19 | CHARLIE SPIERING
Posted on 12/4/2019, 10:48:35 AM by SkyPilot

Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton coughs during a Labor Day rally September 5, 2016 in Cleveland, Ohio. Hillary Clinton launched the home stretch of her US presidential bid aiming to solidify her advantages over rival Donald Trump, with both candidates converging on working-class Ohio as ground zero of their 2016 …

Failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton suffered a lengthy coughing spell Tuesday in an interview with Sirius/XM radio talk show host Howard Stern.

After discussing the 2020 campaign race, and the difficulties of social media, Clinton started coughing as Stern continued speaking.

As she continued coughing, Stern paused and said, “I feel like I need to give you a cough drop or something … you OK?”

“I got one,” Clinton croaked.

Stern recalled her coughing was also the subject of speculation during the campaign, leading people to “speculate about her health.”

“I was dying,” Clinton said in a sarcastic raspy voice as she kept coughing. “I thought I would come on and cough some more.”

The coughing spell lasted about three minutes...

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39372
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #713 on: February 15, 2022, 09:58:44 AM »
Clinton cornered: Hillary refuses to answer questions about Durham revelation she paid to spy on the Trump campaign as she arrives at daughter Chelsea's Manhattan home ahead of the New York Democratic Convention
Daily Mail ^ | 2/15/2022 | Laura Collins
Posted on 2/15/2022, 12:28:52


Hillary Clinton refused to answer questions about allegations that her allies spied on the Trump campaign as the controversy continued to engulf her Tuesday.

Exclusive pictures and video obtained by DailyMail.com show a stoney faced Clinton silently waving away repeated questions of whether she spied on Donald Trump.

She refused to say when or if she planned to comment. Clinton was arriving at her daughter Chelsea’s Manhattan apartment mid morning.

Wearing a blue coat and black pants, she looked strained behind her black face mask as she stoically ran the gauntlet of questions.

The former first lady and secretary of state is slated as the keynote speaker at Thursday's New York state Democratic convention.

It comes after a Friday court filing by Special Counsel John Durham which alleged Clinton's 2016 campaign paid a tech firm to infiltrate Trump Tower servers and later White House servers in a bid to establish a link between Trump and Russia.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...




LOCK HER UP!

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39372
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #714 on: February 15, 2022, 03:44:06 PM »
HILLARY HEALTH EXCLUSIVE: Witness Reveals in 2016 Presidential Campaign Hillary Used a WHEELCHAIR, Couldn’t Walk a Block and Had a “Med Bag” with Her at All Times
Gateway Pundit ^ | 02/15/22 | Joe Hoft
Posted on 2/15/2022, 6:28:52 PM by AnthonySoprano

Based on new evidence uncovered today, Hillary Clinton was carted all over in a wheelchair during her 2016 Presidential campaign. She couldn’t walk a city block and she had a “med bag” near her at all times. We wrote on August 15, 2016 that Hillary was so exhausted that she was taking weekends off. This article caught fire and was the top story at Drudge that day. (Snip) I was the (LE) supervisor assigned to the hotel she [Hillary] was staying at… Everything was enclosed. Walkways within the hotel were enclosed with tarps. And that Scooby van that everybody calls, we were talking about it and there were secret service agents there and they were talking like, ‘Oh yeah, they have it specially made for her. It’s curb height because she can’t step up or down. They want it right at the curb so she can walk right in to it.’

[During a walkthrough a week or so before the event with the Secret Service, Police and hotel staff] We were walking around and where she was going to practice her debate was at the other end of the hotel in a conference room… It’s like a whole block away…The Secret Service agents looked at us and said, ‘she can’t do this… She can’t walk

Snip

I’m in the communications center and there’s some bickering on the radio because you can hear Secret Service talking and they’re bickering back and forth. I’m not thinking much about it. So they get there. And of course, when they get there the hotel shuts down completely… Wherever you are you’re locked down completely and you can’t leave because Hillary doesn’t want to see you…Nobody is supposed to see her. She doesn’t want to look at anybody.

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...

AbrahamG

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18145
  • Team Pfizer
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #715 on: February 15, 2022, 08:21:07 PM »
HILLARY HEALTH EXCLUSIVE: Witness Reveals in 2016 Presidential Campaign Hillary Used a WHEELCHAIR, Couldn’t Walk a Block and Had a “Med Bag” with Her at All Times
Gateway Pundit ^ | 02/15/22 | Joe Hoft
Posted on 2/15/2022, 6:28:52 PM by AnthonySoprano

Based on new evidence uncovered today, Hillary Clinton was carted all over in a wheelchair during her 2016 Presidential campaign. She couldn’t walk a city block and she had a “med bag” near her at all times. We wrote on August 15, 2016 that Hillary was so exhausted that she was taking weekends off. This article caught fire and was the top story at Drudge that day. (Snip) I was the (LE) supervisor assigned to the hotel she [Hillary] was staying at… Everything was enclosed. Walkways within the hotel were enclosed with tarps. And that Scooby van that everybody calls, we were talking about it and there were secret service agents there and they were talking like, ‘Oh yeah, they have it specially made for her. It’s curb height because she can’t step up or down. They want it right at the curb so she can walk right in to it.’

[During a walkthrough a week or so before the event with the Secret Service, Police and hotel staff] We were walking around and where she was going to practice her debate was at the other end of the hotel in a conference room… It’s like a whole block away…The Secret Service agents looked at us and said, ‘she can’t do this… She can’t walk

Snip

I’m in the communications center and there’s some bickering on the radio because you can hear Secret Service talking and they’re bickering back and forth. I’m not thinking much about it. So they get there. And of course, when they get there the hotel shuts down completely… Wherever you are you’re locked down completely and you can’t leave because Hillary doesn’t want to see you…Nobody is supposed to see her. She doesn’t want to look at anybody.

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...

LMFAO.  Stop it.  I'm gonna piss myself from laughing so hard.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39372
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #716 on: February 16, 2022, 04:48:32 AM »
Hillary Clinton looks frazzled outside daughter Chelsea's NYC home
MSN ^ | 2/15/22
Posted on 2/16/2022, 1:40:22 AM


Hillary Clinton refused to answer questions about allegations that her allies spied on the Trump campaign as the controversy continued to engulf her on Tuesday. Exclusive pictures and video obtained by DailyMail.com show a stoney faced Clinton silently waving away repeated questions of whether she spied on Donald Trump .

(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...


________________________ ____________

This is MSN.    Lock her Up! 

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39372
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39372
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.

TheGrinch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5029
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #719 on: February 19, 2022, 08:53:42 AM »
HILDOG for POTUS 2024!!!


Let's do this!!

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39372
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #720 on: February 22, 2022, 06:18:48 AM »

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39372
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #721 on: February 25, 2022, 08:18:40 AM »
Hillary Clinton Praises Biden Russia Response –‘It Has Been Well-Executed’
Breitbart ^ | 02/25/2022 | Trent Baker
Posted on 2/25/2022, 10:39:26 AM

Friday, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton touted President Joe Biden’s handling of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s invasion and attack on Ukraine.

Clinton told MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” that Biden’s response to the escalation from Putin “has been well-executed.”

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...





LMFAO!

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #722 on: February 25, 2022, 09:02:42 AM »
Clinton cornered: Hillary refuses to answer questions about Durham revelation she paid to spy on the Trump campaign as she arrives at daughter Chelsea's Manhattan home ahead of the New York Democratic Convention
Daily Mail ^ | 2/15/2022 | Laura Collins
Posted on 2/15/2022, 12:28:52


Hillary Clinton refused to answer questions about allegations that her allies spied on the Trump campaign as the controversy continued to engulf her Tuesday.

Exclusive pictures and video obtained by DailyMail.com show a stoney faced Clinton silently waving away repeated questions of whether she spied on Donald Trump.

She refused to say when or if she planned to comment. Clinton was arriving at her daughter Chelsea’s Manhattan apartment mid morning.

Wearing a blue coat and black pants, she looked strained behind her black face mask as she stoically ran the gauntlet of questions.

The former first lady and secretary of state is slated as the keynote speaker at Thursday's New York state Democratic convention.

It comes after a Friday court filing by Special Counsel John Durham which alleged Clinton's 2016 campaign paid a tech firm to infiltrate Trump Tower servers and later White House servers in a bid to establish a link between Trump and Russia.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...




LOCK HER UP!

you're saying she's ignoring a subpoena to testify just like THE TRAITOR and his spawn?
or just like all THE TRAITORS cronies who refuse to testify to the January 6th committee ?




Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39372
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #723 on: February 25, 2022, 10:47:46 AM »
Hillary Clinton: Putin Motivated to Invade Ukraine by Trump, January 6
Breitbart ^ | 02/25/2022 | Wendell Husebo
Posted on 2/25/2022, 1:23:50 PM


Failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton in a Friday Atlantic op-ed blamed Russia’s assault on Ukraine on former President Donald Trump, tying Vladimir Putin’s ongoing invasion to the January 6 Capitol riot.

In an opinion piece that used the word “democracy” 47 times, Clinton claimed Putin, the “implacable enemy of democracy,” attacked Ukraine in part because “Republican leaders are abandoning core tenets of American democracy even as the stakes in the global contest between democracy and autocracy are clearer and higher than at any time since the end of the Cold War.”

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63696
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #724 on: February 25, 2022, 03:57:19 PM »
Hillary Clinton: Putin Motivated to Invade Ukraine by Trump, January 6
Breitbart ^ | 02/25/2022 | Wendell Husebo
Posted on 2/25/2022, 1:23:50 PM


Failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton in a Friday Atlantic op-ed blamed Russia’s assault on Ukraine on former President Donald Trump, tying Vladimir Putin’s ongoing invasion to the January 6 Capitol riot.

In an opinion piece that used the word “democracy” 47 times, Clinton claimed Putin, the “implacable enemy of democracy,” attacked Ukraine in part because “Republican leaders are abandoning core tenets of American democracy even as the stakes in the global contest between democracy and autocracy are clearer and higher than at any time since the end of the Cold War.”

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...

Thank God she is not POTUS.