Author Topic: Larry Holmes 48 and 0  (Read 7678 times)

old-school-lifter

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2685
Larry Holmes 48 and 0
« on: May 05, 2015, 07:09:38 PM »
just watched Holmes v Mike  spinks 1 and 2

man, did Larry get screwed by the corrupt vegas judges both times, even worse in the rematch

Spinks did jack, maybe won, @ the most, 5 of 15 rounds in the lst fight

HOlmes was SO underrated its not funny

Pray_4_War

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15801
  • Thot Expert
Re: Larry Holmes 48 and 0
« Reply #1 on: May 05, 2015, 07:28:02 PM »
Tyson destroyed both of those guys.  No mercy.  Not a game.

Hulkotron

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28212
  • I ate an entire box of popsicles the day prior
Re: Larry Holmes 48 and 0
« Reply #2 on: May 05, 2015, 07:30:43 PM »
Ducked the Falcon for years.

Carlton G. Long

  • Guest
Re: Larry Holmes 48 and 0
« Reply #3 on: May 05, 2015, 07:37:30 PM »
Rocky Marciano  49-0


latiuss

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1697
Re: Larry Holmes 48 and 0
« Reply #4 on: May 05, 2015, 07:53:07 PM »
Rocky Marciano  49-0



Eddie does a excellent jew

SquidVicious

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2798
Re: Larry Holmes 48 and 0
« Reply #5 on: May 05, 2015, 08:43:35 PM »
Tyson destroyed both of those guys.  No mercy.  Not a game.
Beat a 50 year old out of shape Holmes. Prime Holmes would've exposed Mike worse than Buster Douglas ever did.

old-school-lifter

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2685
Re: Larry Holmes 48 and 0
« Reply #6 on: May 05, 2015, 08:46:19 PM »
Beat a 50 year old out of shape Holmes. Prime Holmes would've exposed Mike worse than Buster Douglas ever did.

completely agree

Pete Nice

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2870
  • Can't wait until the new DaddyWaddy's come out
Re: Larry Holmes 48 and 0
« Reply #7 on: May 05, 2015, 08:48:23 PM »
Air Falcon

SquidVicious

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2798
Re: Larry Holmes 48 and 0
« Reply #8 on: May 05, 2015, 08:57:51 PM »

tommywishbone

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20501
  • Biscuit
Re: Larry Holmes 48 and 0
« Reply #9 on: May 05, 2015, 08:59:11 PM »
Tyson destroyed both of those guys.  No mercy.  Not a game.

Larry Holmes was 127 years old when they fought.
a

Walter Sobchak

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13570
  • HANKINS IS A FUCKING LIAR & QUITTER
Re: Larry Holmes 48 and 0
« Reply #10 on: May 05, 2015, 09:01:51 PM »
Beat a 50 year old out of shape Holmes. Prime Holmes would've exposed Mike worse than Buster Douglas ever did.

Agreed....one of the best HW jabs ever.

old-school-lifter

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2685
Re: Larry Holmes 48 and 0
« Reply #11 on: May 05, 2015, 11:19:03 PM »
Agreed....one of the best HW jabs ever.

amazing jab, , super fast, accurate and punishing

and underrated hard right cross/uppercut, and combination puncher

tremendous chin, recuperative ability and HEART, to hit back when hurt

great figher

Pray_4_War

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15801
  • Thot Expert
Re: Larry Holmes 48 and 0
« Reply #12 on: May 05, 2015, 11:43:26 PM »
Holmes was 38 years old and only 3 years removed from being the heavyweight champion.  He was not 50 years old.  Tyson was in his late 30's, fat, and only fighting to pay his tax bills when he fought Lennox Lewis in 2002.  Nobody gave a shit about excuses then so I don't give a shit about Larry Holmes's excuses now.  I have no doubt that the 1988 Tyson would have demolished any version of Larry Holmes.

Powerlift66

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11452
Re: Larry Holmes 48 and 0
« Reply #13 on: May 06, 2015, 12:54:46 AM »
Larry:

"You can all kiss me where the sun don't shine...and since we are on HBO...that would be my big black behind!"

illuminati

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20768
  • The Strongest Shall Survive.- - Lest we Forget.
Re: Larry Holmes 48 and 0
« Reply #14 on: May 06, 2015, 12:55:54 AM »
Holmes was 38 years old and only 3 years removed from being the heavyweight champion.  He was not 50 years old.  Tyson was in his late 30's, fat, and only fighting to pay his tax bills when he fought Lennox Lewis in 2002.  Nobody gave a shit about excuses then so I don't give a shit about Larry Holmes's excuses now.  I have no doubt that the 1988 Tyson would have demolished any version of Larry Holmes.














😃 well said. x2 👍🏻

Excuse are okay for Holmes just Not Tyson.
Yes Holmes is underrated.
So is Tyson.

SuperTed

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6701
  • Rebirth
Re: Larry Holmes 48 and 0
« Reply #15 on: May 06, 2015, 03:15:44 AM »
Holmes was still good when he fought Tyson but clearly past his best.
Holmes beat an old Ali. Tyson beat an old Holmes and Lewis beat an old Tyson.

Circle of life. 8)

d0nny2600

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4429
  • http://i.imgur.com/mCzI3N5.jpg
Re: Larry Holmes 48 and 0
« Reply #16 on: May 06, 2015, 03:17:23 AM »
Larry Holmes was 127 years old when they fought.
129 Tommy...he lied on the form

SquidVicious

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2798
Re: Larry Holmes 48 and 0
« Reply #17 on: May 06, 2015, 04:42:39 AM »
Holmes was still good when he fought Tyson but clearly past his best.
Holmes beat an old Ali. Tyson beat an old Holmes and Lewis beat an old Tyson.

Circle of life. 8)
All good except a bum named Buster Douglas beat a prime Mike Tyson. You got any excuses tonight, Roy?

oldtimer1

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17188
  • Getbig!
Re: Larry Holmes 48 and 0
« Reply #18 on: May 06, 2015, 05:02:38 AM »
All good except a bum named Buster Douglas beat a prime Mike Tyson. You got any excuses tonight, Roy?

Tyson was on prescription drugs and drinking living the party life by the time he fought Buster. I will give Buster this. He fought the fight of his life. Remember his mother died right before the fight. Buster gave it his all. Regarding Larry Holmes being 38 in boxing is really old.  It's not bodybuilding.

dr.chimps

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28635
  • Chimpus ergo sum
Re: Larry Holmes 48 and 0
« Reply #19 on: May 06, 2015, 05:07:07 AM »
Larry Holmes was 127 years old when they fought.
He was Cuban. So, like, that's 151, give or take? 

Ronnie Rep

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10117
  • Getbig!
Re: Larry Holmes 48 and 0
« Reply #20 on: May 06, 2015, 05:18:07 AM »
Larry Holmes was 127 years old when they fought.
Exactly, In his prime Tyson would have had his hands full with Holmes.

mame09

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 895
  • its simple if it jiggles its fat
Re: Larry Holmes 48 and 0
« Reply #21 on: May 06, 2015, 06:09:22 AM »
amazing jab, , super fast, accurate and punishing

and underrated hard right cross/uppercut, and combination puncher

tremendous chin, recuperative ability and HEART, to hit back when hurt

great figher

accurate description of holmes.  they tried making holmes vs foreman in the 80s but foreman wanted no part of it

Mr Anabolic

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10647
  • Better to die on your feet than on your knees.
Re: Larry Holmes 48 and 0
« Reply #22 on: May 06, 2015, 06:10:25 AM »
Tyson destroyed both of those guys.  No mercy.  Not a game.

Holmes was past his prime by then.

SuperTed

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6701
  • Rebirth
Re: Larry Holmes 48 and 0
« Reply #23 on: May 06, 2015, 06:14:56 AM »
Holmes' performance against Butterbean remains one of the finest boxing displays ever witnessed.

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40808
  • Child of Y'srael
Re: Larry Holmes 48 and 0
« Reply #24 on: May 06, 2015, 07:50:22 AM »
I'll always remember this about Larry Holmes.   ;D


7