Author Topic: Paul Dillett Compare/Contrast 1993, 1996, 1999  (Read 10211 times)

Alucard

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1204
Re: Paul Dillett Compare/Contrast 1993, 1996, 1999
« Reply #25 on: September 14, 2015, 06:01:13 AM »
We talked about his back problems and injuries endlessly, another thing to note, watch how fucking long his arms are and how huge his shoulders are... Both making his back even more uninpressive... I suppose that nothing is perfect and you can't have everything, Dillett had the freakiest genetic and the most cartoonish proportions, like a superhero... He clearly regressed a lot from 1993 to 1999, although he's hitting his RLS almost decently in that last video from 1999 Olympia...

LurkerNoMore

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33789
  • Dumb people think Trump is smart.
Re: Paul Dillett Compare/Contrast 1993, 1996, 1999
« Reply #26 on: September 14, 2015, 07:00:54 AM »
One of the ugliest faces on or off the stage ever.

Someone told me once that he had severe arthritis in his shoulders and that prevented him from hitting back shots correctly.  Not sure if it is true or not.

Ronnie Rep

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10117
  • Getbig!
Re: Paul Dillett Compare/Contrast 1993, 1996, 1999
« Reply #27 on: September 14, 2015, 07:51:23 AM »
I have heard he had severe rotator cuff issues. Which would explain the way he hit his rear lat spread. Also possibly the way he trained his back.

Royalty

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33220
  • Nasser Endorses Trump 🇺🇸
Re: Paul Dillett Compare/Contrast 1993, 1996, 1999
« Reply #28 on: September 14, 2015, 07:58:59 AM »
Imagine prime Dillett standing next to Heath. There might be a slight width differential :)

bigmikecox

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14367
  • SAY MY NAME!!!!
Re: Paul Dillett Compare/Contrast 1993, 1996, 1999
« Reply #29 on: September 14, 2015, 08:13:36 AM »
I saw him guest pose in 1998 about 4 weeks out from the Olympia and what I saw that night would have pushed Coleman!

Nether Animal

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13813
  • Team Mower Forever
Re: Paul Dillett Compare/Contrast 1993, 1996, 1999
« Reply #30 on: September 14, 2015, 10:48:59 AM »
Description says 2003 but this looks more like '95 ish.

Posing is so weird but freaking huge!


OB1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3222
  • "Happiness equals reality minus expectations."
Re: Paul Dillett Compare/Contrast 1993, 1996, 1999
« Reply #31 on: September 14, 2015, 12:08:04 PM »
Description says 2003 but this looks more like '95 ish.

Posing is so weird but freaking huge!



Unreal.
©

njflex

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 32180
  • HEY PAISAN
Re: Paul Dillett Compare/Contrast 1993, 1996, 1999
« Reply #32 on: September 14, 2015, 12:14:36 PM »
Description says 2003 but this looks more like '95 ish.

Posing is so weird but freaking huge!


PRETTY sick,calves were huge,weird his chest like colemans hangs thick but fdb pose it flattens out ,,he was in good shape for quest posing.

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: Paul Dillett Compare/Contrast 1993, 1996, 1999
« Reply #33 on: September 14, 2015, 03:47:01 PM »
I have heard he had severe rotator cuff issues. Which would explain the way he hit his rear lat spread. Also possibly the way he trained his back.
He said after multiple operations (at the time he just had one) that he had virtually no cartilage in his shoulders. Now, whether that was from wear and tear or operations, or both, or genetics or a combo of everything, who knows. Remember he used to play in the CFL as well.

Which begs the question, imagine if some of these guys from other sports went into bodybuilding? If Paul Dillett had great genetics, imagine other guys.

Da Freak

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2232
  • Get BIG! Or DIE trying!
Re: Paul Dillett Compare/Contrast 1993, 1996, 1999
« Reply #34 on: September 14, 2015, 04:08:51 PM »


holy effing monster of a human being!  :o :o

Ronnie Rep

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10117
  • Getbig!
Re: Paul Dillett Compare/Contrast 1993, 1996, 1999
« Reply #35 on: September 14, 2015, 06:45:00 PM »
He said after multiple operations (at the time he just had one) that he had virtually no cartilage in his shoulders. Now, whether that was from wear and tear or operations, or both, or genetics or a combo of everything, who knows. Remember he used to play in the CFL as well.

Which begs the question, imagine if some of these guys from other sports went into bodybuilding? If Paul Dillett had great genetics, imagine other guys.
I got to see him in the gym not long after he played in the CFL. There are other guys in the NFL that have had great physiques. Can only imagine what they could have done as bodybuilders.

oldtimer1

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18150
  • Getbig!
Re: Paul Dillett Compare/Contrast 1993, 1996, 1999
« Reply #36 on: September 14, 2015, 07:20:46 PM »
If he ever got his act together back in the day he would have been the greatest bodybuilder of all time.

Rudee

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6088
Re: Paul Dillett Compare/Contrast 1993, 1996, 1999
« Reply #37 on: September 14, 2015, 08:58:12 PM »
Description says 2003 but this looks more like '95 ish.

Posing is so weird but freaking huge!




Very strange how he walks at 1:21

aestheticsuk

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 119
Re: Paul Dillett Compare/Contrast 1993, 1996, 1999
« Reply #38 on: September 15, 2015, 06:08:23 AM »
If he ever got his act together back in the day he would have been the greatest bodybuilder of all time.

his genetics were off the charts

OB1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3222
  • "Happiness equals reality minus expectations."
Re: Paul Dillett Compare/Contrast 1993, 1996, 1999
« Reply #39 on: September 15, 2015, 06:09:07 AM »
his genetics were off the charts

There won't be another.
©

Cableguy

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1722
  • Cableguy no longer...
Re: Paul Dillett Compare/Contrast 1993, 1996, 1999
« Reply #40 on: September 15, 2015, 11:18:45 AM »
Damn shame. Sergio level genetics. If he had the back to mach the rest of him, he'd be the best of all time.

Although, in the '96 video you could already see his stomach becoming distended.

Rudee

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6088
Re: Paul Dillett Compare/Contrast 1993, 1996, 1999
« Reply #41 on: September 15, 2015, 02:14:15 PM »


holy effing monster of a human being!  :o :o

The youtube videos with the airforce logo on the bottom left, the uploader always has the video aspect ratio off bigtime, stretching everything out to make it look even wider than normal.  FYI.

beakdoctor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7857
  • Royalty looks like a colostomy bag.
Re: Paul Dillett Compare/Contrast 1993, 1996, 1999
« Reply #42 on: September 15, 2015, 04:02:40 PM »
PRETTY sick,calves were huge,weird his chest like colemans hangs thick but fdb pose it flattens out ,,he was in good shape for quest posing.

That was not guest posing. It was the Hungarian Grand prix. He placed 13th. Dont know why he was wearing those shorts.

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: Paul Dillett Compare/Contrast 1993, 1996, 1999
« Reply #43 on: September 15, 2015, 04:21:46 PM »
The youtube videos with the airforce logo on the bottom right, the uploader always has the video aspect ratio off bigtime, stretching everything out to make it look even wider than normal.  FYI.
before that airforce logo vid, there was the same vid without it. It was grainier. But, I remember the BFO VHS/DVDs, and I remember Paul being about that big.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83764
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Paul Dillett Compare/Contrast 1993, 1996, 1999
« Reply #44 on: September 15, 2015, 05:23:38 PM »
before that airforce logo vid, there was the same vid without it. It was grainier. But, I remember the BFO VHS/DVDs, and I remember Paul being about that big.

All of his videos aren't formatted correctly condensing them and making everyone appear much bigger.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83764
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Paul Dillett Compare/Contrast 1993, 1996, 1999
« Reply #45 on: September 15, 2015, 05:54:12 PM »
Looking HUGE   :o

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Paul Dillett Compare/Contrast 1993, 1996, 1999
« Reply #46 on: September 15, 2015, 08:36:30 PM »
before that airforce logo vid, there was the same vid without it. It was grainier. But, I remember the BFO VHS/DVDs, and I remember Paul being about that big.

Here are some great pics of Paul Dillett from the 1996 BFTO. He looks amazing here and is one of the biggest freaks in bodybuilding history.

More Pics -----> Paul Dillett 1996 BFTO PICS (Drag pics to new tab and it will open to original size)










OB1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3222
  • "Happiness equals reality minus expectations."
Re: Paul Dillett Compare/Contrast 1993, 1996, 1999
« Reply #47 on: September 15, 2015, 08:42:07 PM »
insane.
©

Rudee

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6088
Re: Paul Dillett Compare/Contrast 1993, 1996, 1999
« Reply #48 on: September 15, 2015, 09:47:39 PM »
No wonder the guy never built a decent middle back, his enormous rear delts always took over.   His rear delts are the size of footballs.  Insane.

Alucard

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1204
Re: Paul Dillett Compare/Contrast 1993, 1996, 1999
« Reply #49 on: September 16, 2015, 04:35:36 AM »
I got to see him in the gym not long after he played in the CFL. There are other guys in the NFL that have had great physiques. Can only imagine what they could have done as bodybuilders.
Dillett was also a freak in the CFL, stories of him responding to training like crazy, keep changing shoulder pads... Honestly, who can have those kind of proportions at that weight? Not many i'll tell you...
That was not guest posing. It was the Hungarian Grand prix. He placed 13th. Dont know why he was wearing those shorts.
No it's a guest posing from around 1993, probably in Hungary... Dillett didn't look nowhere near like that in 2003...