ok so we have here a link to a report by a "hate group" and another one showing SPLC retracting suspect information. Once again, sorry to be the bearer of bad news but this does not help your argument. Citing a hate group listed by SPLC is not a credible source. I hope you understand my amusement on this now.
I'm not holding my breath that you'll provide any support for your "novel" claims. ie. of this nefarious racist black menace. Apparently there's a bunch of dangerous black racists supporting Obama. The black panthers are out causing trouble etc. Please do show us this information, looking forward to seeing that. You can't use michael brown because the DOJ went in and shut the whole town down for civil rights abuses. Again we need better examples.
Look, like Obama said, this is the time for a bit of self-reflection and to really consider weather you want to go off the deep end with the rest of the crazies. Trust me, there is no pot of gold at the end of that rainbow. I'm not the only one saying this. Half the republicans agree (at least). You seem to be fairly sensible but there's something clearly amiss. Perhaps you're excluding information that makes you come to uncomfortable conclusions? This will lead to disaster, look at the mess with the GOP at the moment for proof.
I cited the criteria that they use to qualify a hate group. Your illiteracy must have missed that. I notice you didn't comment on the black Lives Matter movement being the largest active hate group by that criteria.
If you choose to deny blacks are racist, that is your business and why no one takes you seriously. You also chose to.ignore Obama attending an openly racist black church for 20 years until the racist rhetoric they preached became known to the public.
I can and will mention Mike brown. If you actually read the doj document in its entirety, as I did, you would know about the racist blacks throughout the community that threatened the honest blacks with physical violence if they came forward and told the truth. Then again, you read racist talking points, not the actual entire documents.
I never mentioned the black panthers, I mentioned the new black panthers, the group that the black panthers are critical of as well. Wow, you didn't know they were 2 different organizations... how sad for one that claims to do so much research and to be a beacon of truth on racial issues.
I agree with obama, it is a time for self reflection. Next time a mike brown is gunned down, he shouldn't jump to the conclusion that it was because the cop was white and the victim was black. He should assess the facts before he makes his opinion, because otherwise he just looks like a racist asshole.
When you do things like citing the 3000 member kkk as being a real danger, yet ignore violent organizations like the new black panthers, you lose credibility. Your bias isn't even up for debate at that point. Oh wait you are so incompetent that you didn't even know the new black Panthers differ from the black panthers. It's that, or you are just a race baiting liar. Who knows
As i told you before, stick to being a troll. It masks your stupidity a bit