NE: Multiple Ted Cruz affairs with pics, names, evidence. This is bad.

[Dos Equis]

So the compulsive liar is unable to post a link to the Cruz sex tape or the Cruz love child?

there is video of him on tues/thurs having regular hookups.  there was a closet incident at 2012 convention and there may be offspring with identical facial features.

Video hasn't been released publicly, but Rubio did release it to several media outlets.  Breitbart chose to sit on it.  NE did not.  Don't you watch OReilly?  He already covered this.

Here is link to the transcripts of Bill O'Reilly's show.  I wonder if the compulsive liar can point us to the transcripts that cover Cruz having sex with hookers on video?  It must be huge news. 

http://www.foxnews.com/shows/the-oreilly-factor/transcripts.html#si=0

[240 is Back]

So the compulsive liar is unable to post a link to the Cruz sex tape or the Cruz love child?

Here is link to the transcripts of Bill O'Reilly's show.  I wonder if the compulsive liar can point us to the transcripts that cover Cruz having sex with hookers on video?  It must be huge news. 

http://www.foxnews.com/shows/the-oreilly-factor/transcripts.html#si=0

OReilly said Breitbart had the story and sat on it.   Where did I claim Bill O said there was a video?

You people like to make things up, Dos Excuses.

[Dos Equis]

OReilly said Breitbart had the story and sat on it.   Where did I claim Bill O said there was a video?

You people like to make things up, Dos Excuses.

"Compulsive liars bend the truth about everything, large and small. For a compulsive liar, telling the truth is very awkward and uncomfortable while lying feels right."

Follow along. 

The compulsive liar was asked for proof that there is video of Cruz having sex with hookers:

And proof of this:

there is video of him on tues/thurs having regular hookups.  there was a closet incident at 2012 convention and there may be offspring with identical facial features.

The compulsive liar responded as follows:

Video hasn't been released publicly, but Rubio did release it to several media outlets.  Breitbart chose to sit on it.  NE did not.  Don't you watch OReilly?  He already covered this.

Where is the link to Bill O'Reilly covering these sex tapes? 

[240 is Back]

I never said OReilly said there was a video.   OReilly covered Breitbart sitting on the STORY. 

I get it, you're confused, this is a complex story.   

No worries, you'll mock it and quote incorrect details until the scandal comes out.  You'll see Cruz called escorts and you'll cling to other parts of the story with "Oh, maybe he signed up for ashley madison and called for escorts, but you haven't yet proven the OTHER parts".

He stinks.  He is shady.  Just move on to another candidate, he's too big a risk. 

Unless you, a former bill clinton voter, kinda want another clinton to win the white house.  Is that the case? 

[Dos Equis]

I never said OReilly said there was a video.   OReilly covered Breitbart sitting on the STORY.  

I get it, you're confused, this is a complex story.  

No worries, you'll mock it and quote incorrect details until the scandal comes out.  You'll see Cruz called escorts and you'll cling to other parts of the story with "Oh, maybe he signed up for ashley madison and called for escorts, but you haven't yet proven the OTHER parts".

He stinks.  He is shady.  Just move on to another candidate, he's too big a risk.  

Unless you, a former bill clinton voter, kinda want another clinton to win the white house.  Is that the case?  

Compulsive liars often have trouble keeping track of their falsehoods.  You are a prime example.  

The quote is abundantly clear:  "Video hasn't been released publicly, but Rubio did release it to several media outlets.  Breitbart chose to sit on it.  NE did not.  Don't you watch OReilly?  He already covered this."

According to the compulsive liar's quote:

(1) there was a video of Cruz have sex with hookers, but the "video hasn't been released publicly."

(2) "Rubio did release it to several medial outlets," with "it" being the video of Cruz having sex with hookers and of the Cruz love child.  

(3) "Breibart chose to sit on it," with "it" being the tape of Cruz having sex with hookers and of the Cruz love child.

(4) "NE did not."  Meaning the National Enquirer covered the tape of Cruz having sex with hookers and the Cruz love child.

(5)  "Don't you watch OReilly?  He already covered this."  And "this" was the Cruz sex tape and the Cruz love child.  

I know it's impossible for someone who is incapable of telling the truth to see how clear this is, but interesting to see how compulsive liars get hoisted by their own petard.  

[Agnostic007]

I never said OReilly said there was a video.   OReilly covered Breitbart sitting on the STORY. 

I get it, you're confused, this is a complex story.   

No worries, you'll mock it and quote incorrect details until the scandal comes out.  You'll see Cruz called escorts and you'll cling to other parts of the story with "Oh, maybe he signed up for ashley madison and called for escorts, but you haven't yet proven the OTHER parts".

He stinks.  He is shady.  Just move on to another candidate, he's too big a risk. 

Unless you, a former bill clinton voter, kinda want another clinton to win the white house.  Is that the case? 

Yeah, your statement indicates O'Reilly covered the release of the sex tapes and the news organization sitting on it.. If you want to change your story that's fine, but don't pretend you didn't say it

[GigantorX]

Has the "info" been released on the Ted Cruz "case" yet?

[240 is Back]

Dos Ex,

I get it.  You were very wrong on Cain & Carson scandal.  You were dragged thru shit on getbig for it, and you hid and licked wounds.

You want to be right on this one, you need it.  It's your Super Bowl, ya know?   

You can't believe that Cruz would do this, I get it.  I think there's something to it.  He hasn't sued the NE, has he?   Odd   ANyway, as you know from past sex cases like with Edwards, it often takes months for all of the evidence to come out.   Take the time, let it happen.  When it does, we expect you'll go silent and nit pick over some small detail.  If 80% of it is proven true, you'll hem and haw about the other 20% that hasn't come to life.  It's what we expect of your kind, so it's cool.

[Straw Man]

I never said OReilly said there was a video.   OReilly covered Breitbart sitting on the STORY. 

I get it, you're confused, this is a complex story.   

No worries, you'll mock it and quote incorrect details until the scandal comes out.  You'll see Cruz called escorts and you'll cling to other parts of the story with "Oh, maybe he signed up for ashley madison and called for escorts, but you haven't yet proven the OTHER parts".

He stinks.  He is shady.  Just move on to another candidate, he's too big a risk. 

Unless you, a former bill clinton voter, kinda want another clinton to win the white house.  Is that the case? 

so complex that you referred to a guy who hasn't been able to practice law for the last 8 years as a "high profile lawyer"

[Straw Man]

Dos Ex,

I get it.  You were very wrong on Cain & Carson scandal.  You were dragged thru shit on getbig for it, and you hid and licked wounds.

You want to be right on this one, you need it.  It's your Super Bowl, ya know?   

You can't believe that Cruz would do this, I get it.  I think there's something to it.  He hasn't sued the NE, has he?   Odd   ANyway, as you know from past sex cases like with Edwards, it often takes months for all of the evidence to come out.   Take the time, let it happen.  When it does, we expect you'll go silent and nit pick over some small detail.  If 80% of it is proven true, you'll hem and haw about the other 20% that hasn't come to life.  It's what we expect of your kind, so it's cool.

240 - you're off the deep end here .

The only one who seems to "need this" is you which is why everyone is busting balls

Why not just wait for the info to come out. 

I for one would love to see that smug doughy Cuban/Canadian have to publicly admit this is true

[Dos Equis]

Yeah, your statement indicates O'Reilly covered the release of the sex tapes and the news organization sitting on it.. If you want to change your story that's fine, but don't pretend you didn't say it

I'm not sure he's capable of admitting he just made it up.  It really is like a sickness.   

[TuHolmes]

I'm not sure he's capable of admitting he just made it up.  It really is like a sickness.   

He didn't make it up, but he decided to follow up just the most worthless rumor and treat it as fact.

That's the problem.

[Dos Equis]

He didn't make it up, but he decided to follow up just the most worthless rumor and treat it as fact.

That's the problem.

If he didn't make it up then where is the link to the video or a story about the video, or the Bill O'Reilly coverage of the video? 

[headhuntersix]

Dos Ex,

I get it.  You were very wrong on Cain & Carson scandal.  You were dragged thru shit on getbig for it, and you hid and licked wounds.

You want to be right on this one, you need it.  It's your Super Bowl, ya know?   

You can't believe that Cruz would do this, I get it.  I think there's something to it.  He hasn't sued the NE, has he?   Odd   ANyway, as you know from past sex cases like with Edwards, it often takes months for all of the evidence to come out.   Take the time, let it happen.  When it does, we expect you'll go silent and nit pick over some small detail.  If 80% of it is proven true, you'll hem and haw about the other 20% that hasn't come to life.  It's what we expect of your kind, so it's cool.

He can't sue when the NE reports that there are alligations and some evidence...not that they are making the alligations and have the evidence. Why isn't this bigger....why isn;t this everywhere. The main stream media has made it there duty to ensure Trump takes on Hilary so they can sell tickets to the car crash. They can't afford to have a guy who is 4 billion times smarter then trump and hil and operates like fucking rain man in a debate...make it to the national ticket. A scandle like this is taylor made but we're getting nothing. Cause there ain't nothing there....if and when there is, fine. But Jesus H Christ...relax Francis.

[TuHolmes]

If he didn't make it up then where is the link to the video or a story about the video, or the Bill O'Reilly coverage of the video? 

Well, I'm sure he "read" about a bunch of rumors and is just regurgitating what those rumors are.

[Dos Equis]

Well, I'm sure he "read" about a bunch of rumors and is just regurgitating what those rumors are.

You're giving him too much credit. 

[Dos Equis]

He can't sue when the NE reports that there are alligations and some evidence...not that they are making the alligations and have the evidence. Why isn't this bigger....why isn;t this everywhere. The main stream media has made it there duty to ensure Trump takes on Hilary so they can sell tickets to the car crash. They can't afford to have a guy who is 4 billion times smarter then trump and hil and operates like fucking rain man in a debate...make it to the national ticket. A scandle like this is taylor made but we're getting nothing. Cause there ain't nothing there....if and when there is, fine. But Jesus H Christ...relax Francis.

I agree. 

[240 is Back]

He didn't make it up, but he decided to follow up just the most worthless rumor and treat it as fact.

That's the problem.

To me, the case stinks enough that I would bet it'll hurt Cruz against Hilary.   It's not worth the risk.

Everyone is waiting for the lawyer to release the info.  Will he do it on the eve of the convention, to completely undermine Cruz on the 2nd ballot?  It may make sense to do that. 

The lawyer was on Alan Colmes radio show last week - he's high profile, sorry but he's very much in the news, he's high profile. 

[240 is Back]

Why isn't this bigger....why isn;t this everywhere. The main stream media has made it there duty to ensure Trump takes on Hilary so they can sell tickets to the car crash. They can't afford to have a guy who is 4 billion times smarter then trump and hil and operates like fucking rain man in a debate...make it to the national ticket. A scandle like this is taylor made but we're getting nothing. Cause there ain't nothing there....if and when there is, fine. But Jesus H Christ...relax Francis.

I do'nt think the dems WANT to use the scandal yet.   Cause right now, it just means the repubs choose Ryan or someone else on ballot two.   Rather, they use this scandal on Cruz in October when he's the nominee, there ain't no coming back, and then they sink him with the stuff the rubio team was shopping around.   It benefits hilary MUCH more to use it later - and I fear she will.

Most people saw that Cruz did have an account on Ashley madison, and they're not shocked.  Dude lived apart from his family.  Dude was VERY close and affectionate with several young 20something hot girls working on his staff.  

Getbiggers aren't saying "No, I think this 44 year old man living alone wouldn't try to get some ass on the side."   Rather, they're saying "but but you can't PROVE today that Cruz did ALL these things..."  

The presidency is at risk and you're not willing to step back, remove the emotion, and say "did this guy probably have something going..."    Anyone here with any bit of life experience realizes a rich & powerful man living alone, surrounded by those enthralled with him, probably gets a little play.  That's just how it is.  I know, until there is 10 forms of evidence, you won't believe it.   

But he's not a safe bet.  That's what I'm saying.  Agree or disagree?

[Straw Man]

I do'nt think the dems WANT to use the scandal yet.   Cause right now, it just means the repubs choose Ryan or someone else on ballot two.   Rather, they use this scandal on Cruz in October when he's the nominee, there ain't no coming back, and then they sink him with the stuff the rubio team was shopping around.   It benefits hilary MUCH more to use it later - and I fear she will.

Most people saw that Cruz did have an account on Ashley madison, and they're not shocked.  Dude lived apart from his family.  Dude was VERY close and affectionate with several young 20something hot girls working on his staff. 

Getbiggers aren't saying "No, I think this 44 year old man living alone wouldn't try to get some ass on the side."   Rather, they're saying "but but you can't PROVE today that Cruz did ALL these things..."   

yet again, ZERO proof that Ted Cruz had an AM account

once again you take the flimsiest of information and drawn a definitive conclusion

and as you wrote you CAN'T prove any of these things but I guess in your case who needs proof.  You just jump ahead to the iron clad conclusion and then mock everyone who doesn't join you in running over that cliff.

[Straw Man]

To me, the case stinks enough that I would bet it'll hurt Cruz against Hilary.   It's not worth the risk.

Everyone is waiting for the lawyer to release the info.  Will he do it on the eve of the convention, to completely undermine Cruz on the 2nd ballot?  It may make sense to do that.  

The lawyer was on Alan Colmes radio show last week - he's high profile, sorry but he's very much in the news, he's high profile.  

is someone who is not allowed to practice law referred to as a lawyer

maybe this non-lawyer will tease this story for as long as he can to get as much attention as he can and then in the end he say he can't release it because he doesn't want to go to jail

If that happens, I assume you'll take that as even more iron clad proof that what you already believe is in fact true and the lack of evidence is somehow, in and of itself, evidence of malfeasance

[headhuntersix]

I do'nt think the dems WANT to use the scandal yet.   Cause right now, it just means the repubs choose Ryan or someone else on ballot two.   Rather, they use this scandal on Cruz in October when he's the nominee, there ain't no coming back, and then they sink him with the stuff the rubio team was shopping around.   It benefits hilary MUCH more to use it later - and I fear she will.

Most people saw that Cruz did have an account on Ashley madison, and they're not shocked.  Dude lived apart from his family.  Dude was VERY close and affectionate with several young 20something hot girls working on his staff.  

Getbiggers aren't saying "No, I think this 44 year old man living alone wouldn't try to get some ass on the side."   Rather, they're saying "but but you can't PROVE today that Cruz did ALL these things..."  

The presidency is at risk and you're not willing to step back, remove the emotion, and say "did this guy probably have something going..."    Anyone here with any bit of life experience realizes a rich & powerful man living alone, surrounded by those enthralled with him, probably gets a little play.  That's just how it is.  I know, until there is 10 forms of evidence, you won't believe it.   

But he's not a safe bet.  That's what I'm saying.  Agree or disagree?

Crushing any opposition to the the retard that is donald trump is media job one...they would much prefer that to Hil/Trump and deconstruct Trump as their ratings explode vs Cruz/Hil....

[headhuntersix]

is someone who is not allowed to practice law referred to as a lawyer

maybe this non-lawyer will tease this story for as long as he can to get as much attention as he can and then in the end he say he can't release it because he doesn't want to go to jail

If that happens, I assume you'll take that as even more iron clad proof that what you already believe is in fact true and the lack of evidence is somehow, in and of itself, evidence of malfeasance

I read a law books once.....

anyhow nothing brings getbiggers of all stripes together faster then one of 240's retarded consiracy theories.

[Dos Equis]

I read a law books once.....

anyhow nothing brings getbiggers of all stripes together faster then one of 240's retarded consiracy theories.

And Donald Trump.   

[SOMEPARTS]

I hope somebody starts a new thread when there is some proof so I don't have to read all that.