What I take away from this thread is how everyone on here talked about Michael Lockett as if he had the best physique ever!!!! Dallas destroys him in everyway. Hight, Mass, Conditioning, on and on and on....( way better legs and calfs...) on top of it he has never even competed against the top ten in the O. Average physique at best. The Myostatin crap was the best! Lol. Phil, Rhoden, Dex, and yes Dallas blow that guy out of the water. And Dallas is not even contest ready. No color even. Anyway, just trying to make a point. If anyone bashes this guys physique which is miles ahead of Lockett? I don't know what to say. *** Yes the tats don't help, but that's one he'll of a physique, and he's no mantelet. Now let's see him with some dark competition color and some oil. Looks contest ready now!
Lockett's muscle quality is different. It's due to his twizzler diet. He also has leg imbalance. He looks more "athletic".
Although Dallas is big, last O he looked odd, and if you look at these pics, you'll also notice that he is developing some severe diastasis recti, which will get worse. And that back tat hides any back detail, which will hinder him from really placing well in big shows. I see him getting bigger and freakier, yet ruining himself, and the folks on Getbig cheering him on in amazement, and then putting him down for screwing up his physique.