Author Topic: Obama Admn sent $400 in hard cash to Iran as 4 hostages freed - WSJ  (Read 10734 times)


Skeeter

  • Guest
Re: Obama Admn sent $400 in hard cash to Iran as 4 hostages freed - WSJ
« Reply #51 on: August 05, 2016, 04:36:50 AM »
You mean Iran is not the largest state sponsor of terrorism in the world? 


According to the US?  ::)

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39450
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama Admn sent $400 in hard cash to Iran as 4 hostages freed - WSJ
« Reply #52 on: August 05, 2016, 06:03:25 AM »
If it wasn’t a ransom payment, why did Obama keep it secret?
By Jonah Goldberg August 4, 2016 | 4:01pm
Modal Trigger If it wasn’t a ransom payment, why did Obama keep it secret?
President Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry Photo: AP
MORE FROM:
JONAH GOLDBERG

 Jonah Goldberg
How we finally had a real 'national conversation on race'

Comey's decision was misguided — but safest for the FBI

The left sees some rights as more equal than others

America's arrogant elites should take Brexit as a warning

The left only wants 'conversations' that it controls
One of my all-time favorite lines is from Henry Thoreau: “Some circumstantial evidence is very strong, as when you find a trout in the milk.”

It came to mind this week when the White House and State Department insisted that the charge the U.S. paid a ransom to get back American hostages was purely circumstantial. Sometimes, a $400 million pay-off in laundered money, delivered in the dead of night in an unmarked cargo plane isn’t what it looks like.

January 16 was “Implementation Day” for the nuclear deal between the United States and Iran, in which the state sponsor of terror received sanctions relief possibly worth as much as $150 billion — which would be roughly equivalent to 40 percent of its GDP — in exchange for some guarantees against developing nuclear weapons … for a while. (The merits, and even the nature, of the Iran nuclear deal are hotly disputed, but that’s a topic for another time.)

That same day, the Obama administration announced a prisoner swap between the U.S. and Iran, in which we traded 7 Iranian criminals and removed another 14 from an Interpol “most wanted” list. In exchange, they returned four innocent Americans, illegally held by the Iranian regime. Back then, Secretary of State John Kerry boasted about what a masterful diplomatic breakthrough it was. Those Americans were freed thanks to “the relationships forged and the diplomatic channels unlocked over the course of the nuclear talks,” Kerry preened.

–– ADVERTISEMENT ––



Yes, well maybe. But few things really cement a solid working relationship like $400 million in cash. Kerry failed to mention that part in his press conferences or Congressional testimony. In fact, the Obama administration kept the whole thing a secret.

The White House concedes that it all looks very bad. But it insists this was in no way a ransom payment; the trout got in the milk for perfectly normal reasons. You see, the Iranians were suing for funds deposited with the Pentagon in 1979 for a weapons purchase that was later blocked when the ayatollahs deposed the Shah.

The $400 million wasn’t a ransom; it was simply the first installment of a $1.7 billion dollar settlement of that dispute. “We would not, we have not, we will not pay ransom to secure the release of U.S. citizens,” top White House flack Josh Earnest insisted. That the money was delivered to coincide with the release of our hostages is little more than a funny coincidence.

And shame on you for thinking otherwise, Earnest seemed to be saying Wednesday. The $400 million drop-off was actually a great success for smart diplomacy, because it saved taxpayers “potentially billions” more if the arbitration over the matter hadn’t gone our way.

Still, one wonders why, if it was such a laudable and innocent money-saving maneuver, they kept it all secret from the American people.

Here’s one possible reason from the Wall Street Journal exposé. “U.S. officials also acknowledge that Iranian negotiators on the prisoner exchange said they wanted the cash to show they had gained something tangible.”
Catch that? The Obama administration did not think the huge pallet of Swiss francs, euros and other currencies dropped off in the dead of night was a ransom payment — they just wanted the Iranians to think it was.

And they bought it! “Taking this much money back was in return for the release of the American spies,” Gen. Mohammad Reza Naghdi, a Revolutionary Guard commander, boasted on Iranian state media.

Sometimes you just have to marvel at the way smart people can talk themselves into stupidity. The whole point of not paying ransoms to terrorists isn’t to save money. The reason we don’t pay kidnappers is that we understand that it will only encourage more kidnapping.

So letting the Iranians think the $400 million was a ransom payment is doubly asinine, because it fooled exactly the wrong people, the wrong way. Who cares if the Obama administration “knew” it wasn’t a ransom? What mattered was to make it clear to the Iranians that it wasn’t a ransom, not give them every reason to believe it was.

Now, because of this pas-de-deux of asininity, not only have we given the Iranians untraceable walking-around money to give to its terrorist proxies, we’ve also given them every incentive to kidnap more Americans — which is exactly what they’ve been doing.

But at least the folks at the State Department can sleep soundly knowing that they didn’t really pay a ransom — it just looks that way.


TuHolmes

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5563
  • Darkness is fated to eventually be destroyed...
Re: Obama Admn sent $400 in hard cash to Iran as 4 hostages freed - WSJ
« Reply #54 on: August 05, 2016, 08:55:14 AM »
Reminded me of this:


I remember seeing that. Iran is going to be crushed by Israel soon enough.

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 59656
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: Obama Admn sent $400 in hard cash to Iran as 4 hostages freed - WSJ
« Reply #55 on: August 05, 2016, 11:24:34 AM »
Iran: $400 Million in Cash Was Part of ‘Expensive Price’ to Free U.S. Hostages

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Obama Admn sent $400 in hard cash to Iran as 4 hostages freed - WSJ
« Reply #56 on: August 05, 2016, 11:32:48 AM »
Iran: $400 Million in Cash Was Part of ‘Expensive Price’ to Free U.S. Hostages

But it was a previous debt.   Part of the deal wasn't "pay this ransom".   It was "Pay this debt you've owed for decades".


Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 59656
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: Obama Admn sent $400 in hard cash to Iran as 4 hostages freed - WSJ
« Reply #57 on: August 05, 2016, 11:43:55 AM »
But it was a previous debt.   Part of the deal wasn't "pay this ransom".   It was "Pay this debt you've owed for decades".



Sure it was. The hostages just happened to be waiting on the Tarmac for plane to arrive.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Obama Admn sent $400 in hard cash to Iran as 4 hostages freed - WSJ
« Reply #58 on: August 05, 2016, 11:50:35 AM »
Sure it was. The hostages just happened to be waiting on the Tarmac for plane to arrive.

one of the conditions of the return of our spies was that we paid a decades-old debt. 

So yes, they weren't getting on the plane until we paid off a debt that another president promised.

it isn't ideal, but neither is our spies getting caught.  The only 'ransom' is that we made good on a promise we made decades ago?

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 59656
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: Obama Admn sent $400 in hard cash to Iran as 4 hostages freed - WSJ
« Reply #59 on: August 05, 2016, 12:01:51 PM »
one of the conditions of the return of our spies was that we paid a decades-old debt. 

So yes, they weren't getting on the plane until we paid off a debt that another president promised.

it isn't ideal, but neither is our spies getting caught.  The only 'ransom' is that we made good on a promise we made decades ago?

Stop just stop. You know it I know it, it's bullshit. With the lies this administration has told it amazes me that even the left can make excuses for them. "They said they said they said"

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Obama Admn sent $400 in hard cash to Iran as 4 hostages freed - WSJ
« Reply #60 on: August 05, 2016, 12:06:46 PM »
Stop just stop. You know it I know it, it's bullshit. With the lies this administration has told it amazes me that even the left can make excuses for them. "They said they said they said"

Are you saying a completely new ransom, made up because of our spies caught, would be equally as bad as "look, pay the money you ALREADY owe us, and you can have your spies back?"

I don't like the idea of our spies getting dealt, but it's what countries do.  We sure as shit woudln't just hand back iranian spies we caught, would we? 

Kazan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6803
  • Sic vis pacem, parabellum
Re: Obama Admn sent $400 in hard cash to Iran as 4 hostages freed - WSJ
« Reply #61 on: August 05, 2016, 06:46:14 PM »
one of the conditions of the return of our spies was that we paid a decades-old debt.  

So yes, they weren't getting on the plane until we paid off a debt that another president promised.

it isn't ideal, but neither is our spies getting caught.  The only 'ransom' is that we made good on a promise we made decades ago?
Debt my ass, fuck the Iranians, we don't owe them a fucking thing accept the wrong end of a hell fire missile. the "promise" was made to the shah, when you over throw your government there are consequences.  So fuck you and your politically correct horse shit. All this fair play nonsense, give an Islamic state and bunch of money, makes perfect sense in the mind of the insane............
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

Kazan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6803
  • Sic vis pacem, parabellum
Re: Obama Admn sent $400 in hard cash to Iran as 4 hostages freed - WSJ
« Reply #62 on: August 05, 2016, 06:50:53 PM »
Are you saying a completely new ransom, made up because of our spies caught, would be equally as bad as "look, pay the money you ALREADY owe us, and you can have your spies back?"

I don't like the idea of our spies getting dealt, but it's what countries do.  We sure as shit woudln't just hand back iranian spies we caught, would we? 

Again who promised these fuckers anything? Spies are well aware of the chance they take, but hey what difference does it make at this point, right? You fucking jagoff
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 59656
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: Obama Admn sent $400 in hard cash to Iran as 4 hostages freed - WSJ
« Reply #63 on: August 05, 2016, 07:08:18 PM »
Are you saying a completely new ransom, made up because of our spies caught, would be equally as bad as "look, pay the money you ALREADY owe us, and you can have your spies back?"

I don't like the idea of our spies getting dealt, but it's what countries do.  We sure as shit woudln't just hand back iranian spies we caught, would we? 

I see, so money that was owed four decades ago is all of the sudden payed the exact same time hostages are released?

Kazan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6803
  • Sic vis pacem, parabellum
Re: Obama Admn sent $400 in hard cash to Iran as 4 hostages freed - WSJ
« Reply #64 on: August 05, 2016, 07:10:19 PM »
I see, so money that was owed four decades ago is all of the sudden payed the exact same time hostages are released?

Ignore 240 is gay, he is full of shit.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Obama Admn sent $400 in hard cash to Iran as 4 hostages freed - WSJ
« Reply #65 on: August 05, 2016, 11:37:00 PM »
I see, so money that was owed four decades ago is all of the sudden payed the exact same time hostages are released?

yes.  Like when your friend wants to borrow your car, but you say "i'll lend it to you if you return my rake".

The rake isn't rent.  It's just some shit you want back.  Only in our case, we wanted our 4 spies back, so they said "Hey, you can have them back, but we want that money you promised us decades ago".

Debt my ass, fuck the Iranians, we don't owe them a fucking thing

It's actually their own money, isn't it?  Reagan froze 12 billion in 1981 and promised to repay it, I think?

http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-01-21/iran-hostage-deal-how-it-works-what-it-means


Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39450
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama Admn sent $400 in hard cash to Iran as 4 hostages freed - WSJ
« Reply #66 on: August 06, 2016, 03:02:19 AM »
yes.  Like when your friend wants to borrow your car, but you say "i'll lend it to you if you return my rake".

The rake isn't rent.  It's just some shit you want back.  Only in our case, we wanted our 4 spies back, so they said "Hey, you can have them back, but we want that money you promised us decades ago".

It's actually their own money, isn't it?  Reagan froze 12 billion in 1981 and promised to repay it, I think?

http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-01-21/iran-hostage-deal-how-it-works-what-it-means




Who gives a F!    These POS have killed american soldiers and aided terrorists in Iraq fighting us.   F these perverts. 

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Obama Admn sent $400 in hard cash to Iran as 4 hostages freed - WSJ
« Reply #67 on: August 06, 2016, 07:22:25 AM »

Who gives a F!    These POS have killed american soldiers and aided terrorists in Iraq fighting us.   F these perverts. 

then let's make that a whole new discussion:

The USA should be able to just keep frozen assets of a nation forever, and renege on any and all agreements if the country does anything against our people.  Cool, I like that. 

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39450
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama Admn sent $400 in hard cash to Iran as 4 hostages freed - WSJ
« Reply #68 on: August 09, 2016, 05:16:46 AM »
As Obama Pays Ransom, Iran Jails More Americans
Frontpagemagazine ^ | August 9, 2016 | Dr. Majid Rafizadeh
Posted on 8/9/2016, 7:52:36 AM by SJackson

As Obama Pays Ransom, Iran Jails More Americans

Why the Mullahs are taking more Americans as hostages.

August 9, 2016
Dr. Majid Rafizadeh
 

Iran is quietly arresting American citizens and taking them as hostages in order to utilize them as pawns for extracting economic concessions or receiving political and financial gains.

President Obama and his administration have played a crucial role in encouraging Iran to conduct such nefarious actions. In the most egregious example, a recent report revealed that, according to U.S. and European officials and congressional staff who were briefed, “The Obama administration secretly organized an airlift of $400 million worth of cash to Iran” when four Iranian-Americans were recently released.

This critical issue raises several questions. For example, why would the administration pay American taxpayer money to a government that ranks first in the world in executing people and in human rights abuses? Why would President Obama pay for the release of Iranian-Americans (including Jason Rezaian, who sympathized with the Iranian government in some of his writings), but not for the release of those Americans who were slaughtered by ISIS?

As part of a string of arrests of American citizens, the Iranian authorities confirmed that they have arrested yet another US citizen, Robin Shahini, who was visiting his ailing mother. Mr. Shanini was not a political or human rights activist. The Iranian government arrested him on vague charges such as conducting crimes against the Islamic Republic. The Iranian government warned his family not to speak with the media.

Iran’s Supreme Leader and his institutions of power -- the Islamist judiciary systems, Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), the intelligence wing (Etela’at), the militia group Basij, and the presidential office -- are behind these waves of arrests targeting American citizens.

We were repeatedly told that the Iranian government would become diplomatic, less hostile and less antagonistic towards the United States if Washington started cutting deals with Tehran to please its leaders.

The Islamic Republic is currently receiving the incentives -- billions of dollars in sanctions relief and billions of dollars from American taxpayers. However, the more the White House bows to Iran with its appeasement policies, the more it empowers the mullahs financially and politically, and the more the Iranian regime feels comfortable arresting Americans, harassing and torturing them, and damaging US national security.

The Islamic Republic of Iran is clearly attempting to show the United States as well as young Iranians that the nuclear agreement does not mean the Islamic Republic will welcome Westerners, open up its political and economic systems, and promote social justice and civil liberties.

In addition, by putting in jail people such as Mr. Shahini, the Iranian government is sending a message to the West that it will not only target prominent and influential people, but also ordinary citizens such as Mr. Shahini.

We also should not forget that Robert Levinson is still missing in Iran and has been since 2007.  The number of other Western citizens being arrested by the Iranian authorities is on the rise as well. For example, in March, Nazak Afshar, a French citizen who travelled to Iran to visit her ill mother, was detained at the time of arrival and was sentenced to six years in prison. The charges against her are still not clear. A month after, Nanzanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe, a British citizen who is also not a political or human rights activist was arrested. She was with her infant daughter. The authorities also confiscated child’s passport. In June Homa Hoodfar, a Canadian citizen and university professor, was arrested. Bahman Daroshafaei, a British citizen, was arrested a few months ago and his family still does not know  his whereabouts and the charges against him.

Mostafa Azizi, a Canadian documentary filmmaker, was arrested and sentenced to eight years in prison for “acting against national security,” “insulting the Supreme Leader,” and “propaganda against the state.” Recently, the Islamic Republic arrested Seraj Mirdamadi, a French journalist, who was later sentenced to six years in prison for “assembly and collusion against national security” and “propaganda against the state”. Hossein Nouraninejad, an Australian journalist was also arrested and sentenced to six years in prison on charges of “propaganda against the state” and “assembly and collusion against national security.”

Even the State Department has acknowledged the increasing threat against American citizens since the nuclear deal was reached. In a March travel warning, the State Department said that since the nuclear deal, “Iran has continued to harass, arrest, and detain U.S. citizens, in particular dual nationals.”

Iran has also arrested an American businessman visiting Iran. This shows that the Iranian government wants to keep the country closed to competition so that the government maintains its monopoly over the wealth and financial system.

The notion that Iran is becoming a rational state actor and that Westerners can visit Iran for tourism are false arguments. The mainstream media attempts to show that these arrests are not the fault of the Iranian president, Hassan Rouhani.  Nevertheless, the truth is that there is no difference between the so-called moderates and hardliners in Iran when it comes to these issues. Neither Rouhani nor his foreign minister, Javad Zarif, has criticized these arrests. They have not even helped put pressure on the system to release these civilians.

More importantly, thanks to President Obama’s policies, Iran has learned that by arresting Americans, it can use them as leverage to receive political and economic concessions from the United States. The Obama administration succumbed to the Iranian government’s demands previously. For example, this year, the administration swapped 7 Iranian prisoners in the US (who were held for serious charges) for a few Americans. Iran also detained American navy officers when it needed to pressure the US to make more concessions.

The US should take this issue seriously. It needs to begin imposing penalties on the Iranian government for its belligerent and nefarious actions, human rights abuses, and violations of the UN Security Council resolutions, such as by testing ballistic missiles, and the secret breaching of the terms of the nuclear agreement.

Skeeter

  • Guest
Re: Obama Admn sent $400 in hard cash to Iran as 4 hostages freed - WSJ
« Reply #69 on: August 09, 2016, 05:59:52 AM »
Echoing Obama Administration comments on the matter last week, the Iranian government today confirmed that cash payments from the United States made in January were unrelated to the prisoner exchange that happened around the same time, and that they were similarly unrelated to the nuclear deal.

This is well documented. The US was ordered by a Hague Tribunal to pay $1.7 billion to Iran over money that Iran had paid for military equipment before 1979, and which the US neither delivered nor refunded payment for. This included substantial interest for the 35+ year period, though the State Department presented this as a comparative victory since Iran had initially sought more interest on the money.



http://news.antiwar.com/2016/08/08/iran-confirms-us-cash-payment-unrelated-to-nuclear-deal/

Option D

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17367
  • Kelly the Con Way
Re: Obama Admn sent $400 in hard cash to Iran as 4 hostages freed - WSJ
« Reply #70 on: August 09, 2016, 08:04:15 AM »
"The White House has been forced to come out today and publicly deny reports that they paid a $400 million “ransom” to the Iranian government for the release of five American prisoners, as part of a prisoner swap in January, noting that the payment was coincidental and unrelated to the prisoner releases.

The Wall Street Journal made the allegations today, claiming the US had “secretly airlifted” the money, a fact which sparked furious condemnations form a number of Republican leaders, who insisted it proved that the prisoner exchange was unacceptable.

In reality the $400 million was a payment related to the rulings of the Hague Tribunal related to the US breaking contracts with the Iranian military after the Iranian Revolution, and never refunding them some $400 million they’d paid for military equipment a generation ago, which America never sent.

Though it’s been presented as “taxpayers’ money” in several reports, and even the State Department statement presented it as a savings that they made a deal to avoid paying interest, the $400 million itself never belonged to the American taxpayers, and was rather a payment for services never rendered.


The White House did confirm the money was airlifted to Iran to pay the Tribunal ruling, because the US has no banking ties with Iran and thus no other way to make such a payment, but that appears to be the only part of the Journal story that was accurate. The transfer wasn’t secret, either, with the State Department issuing a press statement that day affirming the transfer and the reason for it.

The fact that it happened at roughly the same time as the prisoner exchange reflects that both happened amid improving US relations with Iran after the P5+1 nuclear deal, though it appears likely this will remain a campaign issue, despite the facts not supporting the “ransom” theory, since so many in Congress are eager to present any deal with Iran under any circumstances as untoward and part of some broader plot."


http://news.antiwar.com/2016/08/03/white-house-payment-to-iran-unrelated-to-prisoner-release-not-a-ransom/

http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/iran-nuclear-talks/400m-payment-iran-americans-freed-not-ransom-white-house-n622196




"The United States and Iran today have settled a long outstanding claim at the Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal in the Hague.

This specific claim was in the amount of a $400 million Trust Fund used by Iran to purchase military equipment from the United States prior to the break in diplomatic ties. In 1981, with the reaching of the Algiers Accords and the creation of the Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal, Iran filed a claim for these funds, tying them up in litigation at the Tribunal.

This is the latest of a series of important settlements reached over the past 35 years at the Hague Tribunal. In constructive bilateral discussions, we arrived at a fair settlement to this claim, which due to litigation risk, remains in the best interests of the United States.

Iran will receive the balance of $400 million in the Trust Fund, as well as a roughly $1.3 billion compromise on the interest. Iran’s recovery was fixed at a reasonable rate of interest and therefore Iran is unable to pursue a bigger Tribunal award against us, preventing U.S. taxpayers from being obligated to a larger amount of money.

All of the approximately 4,700 private U.S. claims filed against the Government of Iran at the Tribunal were resolved during the first 20 years of the Tribunal, resulting in payments of more than $2.5 billion in awards to U.S. nationals and companies through that process.

There are still outstanding Tribunal claims, mostly by Iran against the U.S. We will continue efforts to address these claims appropriately."

http://m.state.gov/md251338.htm


well that kind of explains that huh soul... facts kind of thrashed your little argument.

Option D

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17367
  • Kelly the Con Way
Re: Obama Admn sent $400 in hard cash to Iran as 4 hostages freed - WSJ
« Reply #71 on: August 09, 2016, 08:06:53 AM »
Cry me a river, don't care, fuck them - You have mistaken me for someone who is PC, I'm not. Give 400 mil to the largest state sponsor of terrorism, this could only make sense to a retard.

but it was their money... what are we talking about here?

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39450
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama Admn sent $400 in hard cash to Iran as 4 hostages freed - WSJ
« Reply #72 on: August 09, 2016, 08:08:16 AM »
well that kind of explains that huh soul... facts kind of thrashed your little argument.

 ::) 

Right a generation ago - and only now - when they take 4 hostages - and weont release them till this is paid.  . . . .

Good job guzzling Obama's jizz - figures you buy into whatever he and his pedo Islamic Imams in Tehran tell you. 


Option D

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17367
  • Kelly the Con Way
Re: Obama Admn sent $400 in hard cash to Iran as 4 hostages freed - WSJ
« Reply #74 on: August 09, 2016, 08:11:07 AM »
::) 

Right a generation ago - and only now - when they take 4 hostages - and weont release them till this is paid.  . . . .

Good job guzzling Obama's jizz - figures you buy into whatever he and his pedo Islamic Imams in Tehran tell you. 

http://www.vox.com/2016/8/4/12370848/ransom-iran-400-million

It’s easy to see how the timing is suspicious. But Ryan, Trump, and other critics have the facts wrong. The Wall Street Journal story is actually describing a payment that President Obama announced back in January. What’s more, the payment was the result of a 35-year case in international court — and had nothing to do with any "hostage" payments.

Once you understand these facts, you will understand that this isn’t actually a story about the Obama administration paying a secret ransom to Iran. It’s a story about the way Washington’s debate over Iran is fundamentally broken.

lol