Charlotte Mayor is now demanding release of the shooting video

[TuHolmes]

Yeah, it was nothing, but you shoot before the perp shoots you. If he had listened, and obeyed the police instructions, he would still be alive.

I saw him reach for nothing, but then that's me.

No point in continuing this one.

[Skeletor]

LOL @ police chief saying "Remember, the video doesn't tell the whole story"

"If it is proving our case should go in a different direction, we will do that"

LOL this motherfccker told us for 3 days that video PROVED the man was pointing a gun.  Media is PISSED at this police chief. 

Video evidence didn't give us probable cause in this case" 

Typical police reasoning. If case looks bad for them: "This doesn't tell the whole story, let's wait for the facts (so we can slowly investigate ourselves)".
If the case looks good for them "It is a clear cut case".
Usually the cops also employ the "if you have nothing to hide what you are afraid of" tactic on plebs citizens but oddly enough it rarely applies to themselves.

[Erik C]

I saw him reach for nothing, but then that's me.

No point in continuing this one.

Did you see the video? The reach is clear.

[TuHolmes]

Did you see the video? The reach is clear.

Which video are you referring to? Tulsa?

Yes I did... No I didn't see him reach for anything.

[Erik C]

Which video are you referring to? Tulsa?

Yes I did... No I didn't see him reach for anything.

Sorry, I didn't know you were blind.

[TuHolmes]

Sorry, I didn't know you were blind.

Well, it's ok, I just realized what kind of asshole you were, so it evens out.

[Erik C]

Well, it's ok, I just realized what kind of asshole you were, so it evens out.

Two cops responded to his "reach behind." One shot him, the right thing to do under those circumstances, and one cop tased him at the very same time. Taser is taking a chance that the perp shoots you, if the taser connections don't hit skin.

[TuHolmes]

Two cops responded to his "reach behind." One shot him, the right thing to do under those circumstances, and one cop tased him at the very same time. Taser is taking a chance that the perp shoots you, if the taser connections don't hit skin.

I don't see any reach, as I said. No point in discussing further.

[chaos]

I thought guns were legal to possess?

Maybe the 2nd amendment doesn't apply to everyone?

It doesn't appear to apply to Californians.

[Erik C]

I don't see any reach, as I said. No point in discussing further.

Two cops respond to the same "reach," at the same time, and I see that "reach" on the video, but you can't believe your lying eyes. Keep on playing let's pretend. Great way to get along in life.

[TuHolmes]

It doesn't appear to apply to Californians.

You KNOW how I feel about that. I have seriously been considering getting the fuck out of here.

I'm thinking 4 years and I'm out.

[240 is Back]

Two cops respond to the same "reach," at the same time, and I see that "reach" on the video, but you can't believe your lying eyes. Keep on playing let's pretend. Great way to get along in life.

one used deadly force, one did not.

[Erik C]

one used deadly force, one did not.

Deadly force was warranted, for reasons that I stated above.

[240 is Back]

Deadly force was warranted, for reasons that I stated above.

why do you think she was charged with manslaughter?

why do you think the other 2 cops didn't even draw their guns?

[TuHolmes]

why do you think she was charged with manslaughter?

why do you think the other 2 cops didn't even draw their guns?

This is a good question.

[Erik C]

why do you think she was charged with manslaughter?

why do you think the other 2 cops didn't even draw their guns?

She was charged, as a sacrifice to political correctness.

The other two cops were behind the other two that caught the "reach" movement and responded, correctly in the case of the woman cop who shot the POS.

[Erik C]

Keith Scott's wife released a cell phone video, that she took of the part of the incident. You hear at least 3 cops yelling, "Put down the gun, put down the gun." She keeps saying, "He don't have no gun." Her video doesn't show anything that happened, just the cars, then you hear the shots.

I ask you, do three cops yell put down the gun, when someone doesn't have a gun, that they can clearly see? And, again, they recovered the gun with Scott's fingerprints on it. They did not recover any books at the scene, that Scott was supposed to be "aiming" at the cops, as the black "witnesses" lied about.

[240 is Back]

Keith Scott's wife released a cell phone video, that she took of the part of the incident. You hear at least 3 cops yelling, "Put down the gun, put down the gun." She keeps saying, "He don't have no gun." Her video doesn't show anything that happened, just the cars, then you hear the shots.

I ask you, do three cops yell put down the gun, when someone doesn't have a gun, that they can clearly see? And, again, they recovered the gun with Scott's fingerprints on it. They did not recover any books at the scene, that Scott was supposed to be "aiming" at the cops, as the black "witnesses" lied about.

Does he raise his hands at the cop, pointing the object at them, as they repeatedly claimed?

[mass243]

WTF,
they showed on news what is going on in USA. Total mayhem, heavily armed soldiers on streets, crack down of protests with tear gas etc.

That is honestly more than what ripped Ukraine apart.

Goes show you how much the outside support matters.
No one is supplying blacks in USA with heavy weaponry, atgm's, advisers and political support.

[Skeletor]

Keith Scott's wife released a cell phone video, that she took of the part of the incident. You hear at least 3 cops yelling, "Put down the gun, put down the gun." She keeps saying, "He don't have no gun." Her video doesn't show anything that happened, just the cars, then you hear the shots.

I ask you, do three cops yell put down the gun, when someone doesn't have a gun, that they can clearly see? And, again, they recovered the gun with Scott's fingerprints on it. They did not recover any books at the scene, that Scott was supposed to be "aiming" at the cops, as the black "witnesses" lied about.

If it's the same video I'm thinking, from the angle shown, there didn't appear to be a gun at the spot it was later shown by police. However there have been many instances where for example cops will yell "stop resisting" to a non resisting or complying person to justify their actions so it would not be beyond them to use such a tactic here as well. Maybe he was holding a gun, maybe he didn't.

[240 is Back]

If it's the same video I'm thinking, from the angle shown, there didn't appear to be a gun at the spot it was later shown by police. However there have been many instances where for example cops will yell "stop resisting" to a non resisting or complying person to justify their actions so it would not be beyond them to use such a tactic here as well. Maybe he was holding a gun, maybe he didn't.

they could have found it in the car.  He could have been saying "I dont have a gun" or whatever.  They're all screaming, are sirens going too?

It's legal in NC to hold a gun.  Open carry means just that.   Just don't point it.  (one of the reasons I HATE open carry states).

Of course - You, I, ANY of us, if we were a cop - would LIE in a minute if we shot someone we shouldn't have shot.  Sorry, but that's what all people do.  They lie, they keep what they have.  They admit they killed someone, and they're going to jail.  They're losing their house.  Their wife is banging their buddies.  Their kids forget who they are. .... and none of that bring back the person they shot.

So all cops have a VERY good motive to lie.  I'm not even hating on them for that - it's human nature.

[Erik C]

Does he raise his hands at the cop, pointing the object at them, as they repeatedly claimed?

You can't see him on her video, until after the shooting, when he's lying on the ground.

Seems to me, if she wanted to show the world what really went on, she could have gotten a better viewing angle, so we could all see that he didn't have a gun, but she was just saying that, hoping to win the ghetto lottery, collecting big bucks for her worthless dead husband, who wasn't worth $1.98 in real life.

[Soul Crusher]

You can't see him on her video, until after the shooting, when he's lying on the ground.

Seems to me, if she wanted to show the world what really went on, she could have gotten a better viewing angle, so we could all see that he didn't have a gun, but she was just saying that, hoping to win the ghetto lottery, collecting big bucks for her worthless dead husband, who wasn't worth $1.98 in real life.

Yeah - that dude seems to have ample time to get his shit together to show he wasnt holding anything

[Erik C]

The gun that the police found next to Keith Scott's body, had Scott's fingerprints, DNA, and his blood on it. His lying wife saying, "He don't have no gun," but deliberately not videoing her husband as the police are confronting him, so we couldn't see that he did indeed have a gun, was just part of her plan to win the "ghetto lottery" by suing the city because the cops killed her POS husband. Negroes are disgusting excuses for human beings.

[chaos]

You KNOW how I feel about that. I have seriously been considering getting the fuck out of here.

I'm thinking 4 years and I'm out.

I'm close to being on the same path. Although I will be placing an order tonight for a Spikes Tactical that I found on sale........LOL