Author Topic: Trump = Winning  (Read 1366782 times)

Grape Ape

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26068
  • SC è un asino
Re: Trump = Winning
« Reply #9025 on: Today at 02:51:06 PM »
James Comey was investigated multiple times by the Justice Department and the IRS during and after Trump's first term, stemming from the Russia investigation and his handling of sensitive information.

Yes, he was investigated and testified in 2020.

Now he's being indicted for lying and therefore obstruction during it.

Why is that harassment?

Should they let it slide?
Y

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 43079
Re: Trump = Winning
« Reply #9026 on: Today at 04:33:28 PM »
Yes, he was investigated and testified in 2020.

Now he's being indicted for lying and therefore obstruction during it.

Why is that harassment?

Should they let it slide?

The November indictment was voided. He may be indicted again if the proscution refiles and if the statute of limitations has not expired.

Grape Ape

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26068
  • SC è un asino
Re: Trump = Winning
« Reply #9027 on: Today at 05:01:07 PM »
The November indictment was voided. He may be indicted again if the proscution refiles and if the statute of limitations has not expired.

It was overturned based on the appointment of the specific prosecutor, not on the basis of its own merit.  We know this.

But that's not what I asked you - do you think they should not bring charges against Comey, and that they're just harassing him? 

If the Grand Jury felt there was enough evidence to bring two charges against him, before the judge ruled the prosecuting attorney was not appointed legally, why would you feel it's harassment?.
Y

illuminati

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25825
  • The Strongest Shall Survive.- - Lest we Forget.
Re: Trump = Winning
« Reply #9028 on: Today at 07:55:16 PM »
It was overturned based on the appointment of the specific prosecutor, not on the basis of its own merit.  We know this.

But that's not what I asked you - do you think they should not bring charges against Comey, and that they're just harassing him? 

If the Grand Jury felt there was enough evidence to bring two charges against him, before the judge ruled the prosecuting attorney was not appointed legally, why would you feel it's harassment?.


Wasting your time asking him anything - he's just not mentally capable of giving a straigh
Honest answer ,  he'll word salad the reply / Feign ignorance/ stupidity or just ignore.

Helpless case - The TDS has destroyed any semblance of normal functioning brain cells.