Trump = Winning

[Dos Equis]

TRUTH Social Trump's $1 billion investment looks as though nothing illegal had gone down despite a plan to go public via a special purpose acquisition company (or SPAC), which would allow the ex-president to get rich by selling stock—without actually having to build a profitable company or even launch the social network at all.

Rep. Devin Nunes, a close ally of former President Donald Trump and the former chair of the House Intelligence Committee, will resign from Congress later this month to run Trump’s new social media company, TRUTH Social.

Trump announced that he is suing Big Tech CEOs including Facebook’s Mark Zuckerburg, Twitter’s Jack Dorsey and Google’s Sundar Pichai over alleged censorship. On Oct. 27, Trump announced the launch date for “TRUTH Social,” which he said would help Americans “stand up to the tyranny of Big Tech.” The final launch, according to Fox News, will take place in the first quarter of 2022. TRUTH Social is a part of Trump's new company, Trump Media & Technology Group (TMTG).

Securities regulators have opened investigations into the planned merger of a nascent social media company backed Donald Trump with a so-called blank-check company that raised nearly $300 million in an initial public offering in September. Digital World was established as a special purpose acquisition company—an entity that raises money through an IPO and then seeks a company to acquire. When SPACs go public, they are not supposed to have engaged in merger talks without disclosing that to investors.

Stay tuned.

What a shock.  lol  Bunch of abusive, fascist tyrants. 

And you really should cite your source, unless you actually wrote this. 

[Primemuscle]

What a shock.  lol  Bunch of abusive, fascist tyrants. 

And you really should cite your source, unless you actually wrote this.

I wrote this as a result of reading multiple sources. I should probably have cited them...the list would be long. In the end this resulting post is mine. I guess when one only posts questions as opposed to statements, it can be confusing. My challenge to you is to do your own investigation...seriousl y...how your conclusions differ from mine might be really interesting. 

[Dos Equis]

I wrote this as a result of reading multiple sources. I should probably have cited them...the list would be long. In the end this resulting post is mine. I guess when one only posts questions as opposed to statements, it can be confusing. My challenge to you is to do your own investigation...seriousl y...how your conclusions differ from mine might be really interesting.

You should use quotation marks instead of plagiarizing someone else's writing.  I only looked at your first paragraph, but there is this:

TRUTH Social Trump's $1 billion investment looks as though nothing illegal had gone down despite a plan to go public via a special purpose acquisition company (or SPAC), which would allow the ex-president to get rich by selling stock—without actually having to build a profitable company or even launch the social network at all.

You are quoting this:  "via special purpose acquisition company (or SPAC), which would allow the ex-president to get rich by selling stock—without actually having to build a profitable company or even launch the social network at all."  https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2021/12/donald-trump-spac-billion-dollar-investment

I suspect if I looked at each subsequent paragraph that you've done the same thing.  The post is not yours.  You are plagiarizing when you sprinkle in a few of your own words with long passages you've copied from someone else, without attribution.  Don't be like Joe Biden.   

[Primemuscle]

You should use quotation marks instead of plagiarizing someone else's writing.  I only looked at your first paragraph, but there is this:

You are quoting this:  "via special purpose acquisition company (or SPAC), which would allow the ex-president to get rich by selling stock—without actually having to build a profitable company or even launch the social network at all."  https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2021/12/donald-trump-spac-billion-dollar-investment

I suspect if I looked at each subsequent paragraph that you've done the same thing.  The post is not yours.  You are plagiarizing when you sprinkle in a few of your own words with long passages you've copied from someone else, without attribution.  Don't be like Joe Biden.   

Knock yourself out.

You wrote, "And you really should cite your source, unless you actually wrote this." To which I replied that I should have cited the sources. The post is mine, which I derived from multiple sources. But hey, feel free to argue these nuisances rather than address the actual content. It is an excellent avoidance tactic.

[Dos Equis]

Knock yourself out.

You wrote, "And you really should cite your source, unless you actually wrote this." To which I replied that I should have cited the sources. The post is mine, which I derived from multiple sources. But hey, feel free to argue these nuisances rather than address the actual content. It is an excellent avoidance tactic.

You understand that citing your source is only part of it?  If you are quoting someone else's writing you should either use quotation marks or at a minimum make it clear you are quoting someone else.  Not that hard to do. 

So you're saying it's an excellent avoidance tactic to do something like focus on the source of the material instead of the point being made?  You wouldn't know anything about doing that would you?   

[Primemuscle]

You understand that citing your source is only part of it?  If you are quoting someone else's writing you should either use quotation marks or at a minimum make it clear you are quoting someone else.  Not that hard to do. 

So you're saying it's an excellent avoidance tactic to do something like focus on the source of the material instead of the point being made?  You wouldn't know anything about doing that would you?   

Thank you Mr. plagiarism policeman.

Tell you what. Why don't you look up everything I wrote in the post in question and assign quotation marks where I actually quoted something word for word. If all I did was capture the essence of what was originally written because it couldn't be better stated, then you can assign the appropriate source. Warning, there are several. 

When you complete this exercise, lets discuss the topic of the original post.      

[Dos Equis]

Thank you Mr. plagiarism policeman.

Tell you what. Why don't you look up everything I wrote in the post in question and assign quotation marks where I actually quoted something word for word. If all I did was capture the essence of what was originally written because it couldn't be better stated, then you can assign the appropriate source. Warning, there are several. 

When you complete this exercise, lets discuss the topic of the original post.   

You should read what I already posted.  Check the bold part and compare it with the quote and I link I posted.  Here it is again:

TRUTH Social Trump's $1 billion investment looks as though nothing illegal had gone down despite a plan to go public via a special purpose acquisition company (or SPAC), which would allow the ex-president to get rich by selling stock—without actually having to build a profitable company or even launch the social network at all.

You are quoting this:  "via special purpose acquisition company (or SPAC), which would allow the ex-president to get rich by selling stock—without actually having to build a profitable company or even launch the social network at all."  https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2021/12/donald-trump-spac-billion-dollar-investment

That's plagiarism. 

Sincerely,

Officer Dos Equis

[Humble Narcissist]

Christianity could be a religion used by the Jews to keep their enemies down.

[Dos Equis]

Trump approval higher than day he left, 85% in GOP: Poll
by Paul Bedard, Washington Secrets Columnist |   | January 06, 2022
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/washington-secrets/trump-approval-higher-than-day-he-left-85-in-gop

[Grape Ape]

Trump approval higher than day he left, 85% in GOP: Poll
by Paul Bedard, Washington Secrets Columnist |   | January 06, 2022
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/washington-secrets/trump-approval-higher-than-day-he-left-85-in-gop

No, thank you.

[Dos Equis]

No, thank you.

You don't think that is wishful thinking?

[Primemuscle]

According to Marquette Law School in November 2021

Trump's overall approval rating was currently at 41.4% while his disapproval rating was at 53%. Joe Biden had an approval rating among Republicans of 10% while Trump had approval rating among Democrats of 7%.

https://www.marquette.edu/news-center/2021/new-marquette-law-poll-finds-majority-of-republicans-favor-a-trump-run-for-president-in-2024.php

[Soul Crusher]

She is one of us in many ways.

[Primemuscle]

At last, I have something positive to say about Donald Trump. It has been reported that over the past year, he's lost 15 lbs. Back in February 2019 he weighed 243 lbs. If he is really 6'3" tall, weighing only 228 isn't too bad. He's gone from a 30.4 BMI which is considered to be obese to a 28.5 BMI which means he's in the overweight category now. All he has to do is lose another 29 lbs. and he'll have a BMI under 25, which is considered normal weight.

Keep hitting the course Donald and continue to lay off the M & M's, Big Mac's and KFC. You can do it!



The change is so drastic, some think the comparison photo is fake. What do you think?

[Humble Narcissist]

At last, I have something positive to say about Donald Trump. It has been reported that over the past year, he's lost 15 lbs. Back in February 2019 he weighed 243 lbs. If he is really 6'3" tall, weighing only 228 isn't too bad. He's gone from a 30.4 BMI which is considered to be obese to a 28.5 BMI which means he's in the overweight category now. All he has to do is lose another 29 lbs. and he'll have a BMI under 25, which is considered normal weight.

Keep hitting the course Donald and continue to lay off the M & M's, Big Mac's and KFC. You can do it!



The change is so drastic, some think the comparison photo is fake. What do you think?

He can eat all that stuff and still lose weight.

[Soul Crusher]

[Gym-Rat]

biden couldnt get 15 people at his rally
he'd get up there shit his pants mumble for a minute, etc
then, back to the dementia ward with you joseph
time for your ice cream after your diaper change

[Soul Crusher]

[Soul Crusher]

[loco]

Trump’s Truth App Climbs to Top Spot in Apple Store on Release Day

Donald Trump’s social app Truth became the top-downloaded free Apple store app after launching Monday.



https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/trump-truth-app-climbs-top-225650629.html

[Soul Crusher]

[Primemuscle]

[Coach is Back!]

What’s your point now?

[Primemuscle]

What’s your point now?

It's just a friendly reminder that it is time for you to donate to Trump's campaign fund again. We wouldn't want his most ardent  supporter being called a deserter because you didn't donate. 

Trump Entered 2022 With $122 Million in the Bank
Trump's overall war chest has more than double the cash on hand of the Republican National Committee.

[Soul Crusher]

2 Prosecutors Leading N.Y. Trump Inquiry Resign, Clouding Case’s Future
Failing NYTimes ^
Posted on 2/23/2022, 2:58:40 PM by

The two prosecutors leading the Manhattan district attorney’s investigation into former President Donald J. Trump and his business practices abruptly resigned on Wednesday amid a monthlong pause in their presentation of evidence to a grand jury, according to people with knowledge of the matter, throwing the future of the high-stakes inquiry into serious doubt.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...