Author Topic: Examining the top contenders on Trump's Supreme Court list  (Read 10409 times)

polychronopolous

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19041
Re: Examining the top contenders on Trump's Supreme Court list
« Reply #75 on: April 07, 2017, 09:49:58 AM »
Now replace Justice Breyer and Justice Ginsburg with Ted Cruz and Trey Gowdy and I can sleep alot better going into the next 30 years.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63727
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Examining the top contenders on Trump's Supreme Court list
« Reply #76 on: April 07, 2017, 12:45:43 PM »
The Senate Has Confirmed Neil Gorsuch To The Supreme Court

https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/the-senate-has-confirmed-neil-gorsuch-to-the-supreme-court?utm_term=.gpzmr3WpN#.to79lBoR0 Buzzfeed, just to troll

The 54-45 vote confirming Gorsuch to the high court ends the more than year-long vacancy on the Supreme Court since Justice Antonin Scalia’s death.



Outstanding.  Can't believe the Democrat from Colorado voted against him. 

And I'm glad they went nuclear.  Democrats would have done precisely the same thing eventually (if and when they have control of the Senate and presidency). 

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63727
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Examining the top contenders on Trump's Supreme Court list
« Reply #77 on: April 07, 2017, 12:47:03 PM »
Bob Dole, Trent Lott and History Back 'Nuking' Gorsuch Filibuster
By John Gizzi
Thursday, 06 Apr 2017

In the hours since the Senate voted Thursday to end the filibuster for nominees to the Supreme Court, there has been a considerable furor in the national press about the potentially dangerous course Republican lawmakers have taken to insure a vote for Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch.

"In deploying the so-called nuclear option," concluded The New York Times, "lawmakers are fundamentally altering the way the Senate handles one of its most significant duties — a sign of the body's creeping rancor in recent years after decades of at least relative bipartisanship on Supreme Court matters."

But two former senators who have served as minority and majority leader of the Senate offered sharply different opinions on the deployment of the nuclear option; moreover, a study of the history of the filibuster shows it has been deployed precisely one time in a nomination to the Supreme Court — and on that occasion, it had bipartisan backing.

In a strongly worded statement before the vote Tuesday, former Senate Republican leaders Bob Dole, R-Kan., and Trent Lott, R-Miss., said "drawn from a combined 18 years as floor leaders, we support eliminating the pretense of a 60-vote 'requirement.' In the hands of today's Democrats, 60 votes assures defeat of future Republican presidential nominees. As their opposition to Gorsuch shows, no similar nominee could ever be confirmed if that 'requirement' remains."

As for the charge Senate Republicans were taking the nomination process in a new direction, the view of Dole and Lott is the polar opposite.

"We have watched as Senate traditions have been steadily eroded," they wrote, "including the filibuster of Bush's judicial nominees and the changing of the Senate rules to push through President Barack Obama's lower-court nominees."

Tradition, in fact, seems to be on the side against the filibustering of Supreme Court nominees. Until 1949, in fact, there was no filibustering against nominations at all because the "cloture rule" — the two-thirds of the Senate (now 60 votes) required to break a filibuster — applied to legislation and not to-be appointments.

According to a history compiled by the Judicial Crisis Network, "from 1949 to 2003, cloture motions were filed on only 17 judicial nominees. Cloture was successful on the first attempt in 11 cases . . . In the six instances where cloture was not invoked on the first try, no more than two attempts were necessary, and those nominees were ultimately confirmed."

The lone exception is the only Supreme Court nomination ever to be successfully filibustered: Associate Justice Abe Fortas, named by President Lyndon Johnson as chief justice in the summer of 1968 (after LBJ had announced he was not seeking re-election that year).

Because of Fortas' nomination so late in Johnson's last term, and because of ethical concerns about the nominee, the filibuster against him was bipartisan. The vote for cloture was 45 – far below the two-thirds of the Senate required at the time — and Fortas finally asked his nomination be withdrawn.

A year later, he resigned from the court as the ethical questions about him took their toll.

As for a history on which opponents of the nuclear option could make their case, there is no there there

http://www.newsmax.com/JohnGizzi/filibuster-Senate-confirmation-nuclear-option/2017/04/06/id/783032/

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63727
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Examining the top contenders on Trump's Supreme Court list
« Reply #78 on: April 07, 2017, 01:09:17 PM »
Also, using Obama logic, because three Democrats voted to confirm, this was a "bipartisan" vote.

Yamcha

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13292
  • Fundie
Re: Examining the top contenders on Trump's Supreme Court list
« Reply #79 on: April 10, 2017, 08:35:30 AM »
a

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63727
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Examining the top contenders on Trump's Supreme Court list
« Reply #80 on: April 17, 2017, 01:55:25 PM »
Gorsuch breaks mold, asks numerous questions in Supreme Court debut
By  Bill Mears 
Published April 17, 2017
FoxNews.com

WASHINGTON –  An upbeat Justice Neil Gorsuch wasted little time getting to work in his first public session Monday as the 113th member of the Supreme Court.

Sitting at the far right end of the nine-member bench, Gorsuch spent the morning hearing three oral arguments, each lasting about an hour. In his first case, considering a federal workplace discrimination claim, the newest justice was among the most active of questioners -- unusual for the court "rookie."

At the start of the morning session, Chief Justice John Roberts publicly acknowledged his new colleague in the crowded courtroom, wishing him a "long and happy career in our common calling."

Gorsuch responded by thanking the other justices for giving him a "warm welcome."

The 49-year-old Colorado native paid close attention to the arguments, sitting straight up and resting his hand occasionally on his chin.

He remained focused -- not even chatting with his "bench neighbor," Justice Sonia Sotomayor -- as he asked a number of questions of counsel. The back-and-forth exchanges lasted more than 10 minutes of the first 60-minute argument.

The first case out of the gate for Gorsuch was not a blockbuster, but the justice repeatedly pressed lawyers from both sides with his positions.

When one attorney admitted he tended to agree with the justice on one point, Gorsuch dryly replied, "I hope so."

At one point, he even apologized for the amount of questions, saying, “Sorry for taking up so much time.”

The other cases being argued separately Monday deal with a property rights dispute and securities class-action lawsuits.

Settling In

Even before Monday's arguments, Gorsuch had begun settling in at the court, arranging his chambers to create a comfortable, efficient workplace. Reminders of his roots in Colorado and the West will grace his offices, along with plenty of photos of his family and friends.

He is allowed to hire secretaries, a messenger, and four law clerks -- who typically serve for one year.

Those clerks will be especially important helping the justice get up to speed on his caseload, since joining the court in the midst of the term is not standard. It will be a nonstop whirl of activity until the term effectively ends in late June.

All four of the law clerks brought on in recent days served previously for then-Judge Gorsuch, and are all experienced litigators or academics. Two of them later went on to clerk for Antonin Scalia (the late justice whose seat Gorsuch is now occupying) and Justice Sonia Sotomayor.

His colleagues are welcoming their newest member.

"We hope we're serving with Justice Gorsuch for the next 25 years," Roberts said last week before a university audience in New York. "It's kind of like a marriage. If you're going to be with someone that long, you can't have knock-down, drag-out fights over a case."

Lunch Is Served

Food for thought for the newest member of the Supreme Court: being the junior justice has its benefits and challenges.

For Gorsuch, it will mean being assigned to the court's internal Cafeteria Committee, where dessert toppings and silverware choices will compete for his time with constitutional issues big and small -- all part of the dizzying first few weeks for the justice.

Justice Elena Kagan, who had been the court "newbie" since 2010, unwittingly gave her future colleague some personal advice on managing the job. She appeared last September at a Colorado legal conference with Gorsuch and spoke to what it was like to have the least seniority.

"I think this is a way to kind of humble people," she said about her stint as one of the office lunch monitors. "You think you're kind of hot stuff. You're an important person. You've just been confirmed to the United States Supreme Court. And now you are going to monthly cafeteria committee meetings where literally the agenda is what happened to the good recipe for the chocolate chip cookies."

And the rookie hears about it when the food doesn't rate. One tradition of the court is the justices eat together privately after oral arguments.

"Somebody will say, 'Who's our representative to the cafeteria committee again?'" she told Gorsuch. "Like they don't know, right? And then they'll say, 'This soup is very salty.' And I'm like supposed to go fix it myself?"

Kagan recalled her proudest moment was getting a frozen yogurt machine installed in the dining area, which is open to the public.

She had been on the internal committee for seven years, with Justice Stephen Breyer in the job 11 years before that.

"It's a way of bringing them back down to Earth after the excitement of confirmation and appointment," Roberts said in 2011. Roberts' role as "first among equals," though, meant he never had to endure any of the "new guy" responsibilities.

Another duty for the "junior" justice is to answer the door when the members meet privately for their weekly closed-door conferences -- voting on cases and deciding which petitions get added to the docket. His first such conference will be this Thursday.

Gorsuch will also take notes at the conferences, and will vote last when cases get decided.

It is a learning curve that many on the court admit can be baffling and often overwhelming.

Justice Samuel Alito said he frequently got lost in the marbled halls of the court when he joined in 2006, especially since the building was undergoing a massive internal renovation at the time.

Breyer said it took him years to feel fully comfortable in the job.

And Justice Clarence Thomas recalled what Justice Byron White told him when he donned the robes in 1991. White, whose clerks included Gorsuch, said, "Well, Clarence, in your first five years you wonder how you got here. After that you wonder how your colleagues got here."

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/04/17/gorsuch-breaks-mold-asks-numerous-questions-in-supreme-court-debut.html

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63727
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Examining the top contenders on Trump's Supreme Court list
« Reply #81 on: June 29, 2018, 05:52:32 PM »
Supreme Court justice nominee coming July 9, Trump says
Matt Richardson By Matt Richardson   | Fox News

The president discusses Justice Kennedy's retirement and the process of finding a replacement during a rally in Fargo, North Dakota.

The nominee to replace retiring Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy will be announced on July 9, President Trump said on Friday.

Trump, who is in New Jersey for the weekend, said he plans to interview one or two candidates on Saturday or Sunday before announcing his nominee after the Fourth of July.

“I’ve got it narrowed to about five,” he said, including two women. The president said he didn’t plan to probe any potential replacements about Roe v. Wade.

“I’m not going to ask them that question.”

Kennedy announced Wednesday that he is retiring, effective July 31, giving the president the opportunity to make a second pick for the Supreme Court.

WHO ARE THE SUPREME COURT JUSTICES?

The decision comes a year after Kennedy's former law clerk, Neil Gorsuch, took over the seat occupied by the late Justice Antonin Scalia.

Republican lawmaker from Utah to play a pivotal role in the upcoming debate over Kennedy's seat. Senator Lee speaks out on 'Fox News @ Night.'Video
Sen. Mike Lee on being a possible replacement for Kennedy

While speaking to reporters inflight to Morristown, New Jersey on Friday afternoon, Trump mentioned Senator Mike Lee, R-Utah. “He said he’d like the job," Trump noted. "Usually they don’t say that.”

Lee and his brother, Utah Supreme Court Justice Thomas Lee, are both on the list to replace Kennedy – setting up a sibling showdown over who could get the nod.

With Kennedy's departure, Republicans have a chance to tip the balance of the court. It already has four justices picked by Democratic presidents and four picked by Republicans, so Trump's pick could shift the ideological balance toward conservatives for years to come.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/06/29/supreme-court-justice-nominee-coming-july-9-trump-says.html

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63727
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Examining the top contenders on Trump's Supreme Court list
« Reply #82 on: July 30, 2018, 03:20:17 PM »
Brett Kavanaugh to Meet with Democrat Joe Manchin as SCOTUS Confirmation Looms
Manchin and Kavanaugh combo photoAssociated Press
30 Jul 2018

Sen. Joe Manchin (R-WV) is the first Democrat to announce he will meet with President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court justice nominee, Brett Kavanaugh. The meeting is scheduled for Monday, according to media reports.

Kavanaugh will replace Justice Anthony Kennedy, who is retiring. Unlike some Democrats who have vowed to outright oppose Kavanaugh, Manchin has said he wants to “evaluate” the nominee, who is an accomplished judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

Most Democrats say they oppose Kavanaugh because they believe he would vote to overturn the abortion-legalizing Roe v. Wade Supreme Court case and reverse Obama-era government-run health care.

“I will evaluate Judge Kavanaugh’s record, legal qualifications, judicial philosophy and, particularly, his views on health care,” Manchin said when Trump named Kavanaugh as his nominee.

“I believe the Senate should hold committee hearings; senators should meet with him, we should debate his qualifications on the Senate floor and cast whatever vote we believe he deserves,” Manchin said.

Kavanaugh is also scheduled to meet with Sen. Richard Shelby (R-AL) on Monday.

The meetings come on the day the National Archives released documents from the time when Kavanaugh worked in the independent counsel’s office in the 1990s, according to the Washington Times:

Most of the documents appear to be correspondence and case files that came across Judge Kavanaugh’s desk during his time working for Ken Starr, the independent counsel who investigated the Clintons.

Judge Kavanaugh would later go on to work in the Bush White House before winning a seat on the federal circuit court in D.C., in 2006.

The Archives said it released 1,025 pages of documents.

The Times reports the documents show Kavanaugh’s work parallels the current Department of Justice special counsel investigation into Russian involvement in the Trump presidential campaign.

“Mr Kavanaugh’s conclusion at the time was that Congress had a right to do its own investigation that may overlap the independent counsel, but it didn’t have a right to get a look at the probe’s work,” the Times reported.

https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/07/30/kavanaugh-meet-democrat-manchin-scotus-appointment-looms/

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63727
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Examining the top contenders on Trump's Supreme Court list
« Reply #83 on: July 30, 2018, 03:22:46 PM »
Dershowitz Predicts Kavanaugh Will Easily Win SCOTUS Confirmation
By Sandy Fitzgerald    |   Monday, 30 July 2018

Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh will be confirmed, and it won't be a close vote, Harvard Law professor emeritus Alan Dershowitz predicted Monday, while commenting that he wishes politics could be kept out of the confirmation process.

"He will get 54 or 55 votes, I think, because the president selected well," Dershowitz told Fox News' "America's Newsroom."

"If he had picked somebody far less qualified who has strong ideological views it would be a closer vote."

Kavanaugh, a U.S. Circuit Judge in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, has "extraordinary experience and taught at Harvard, where "the students loved him," said Dershowitz.

"Many of the students, both liberals and conservatives, wrote a petition supporting him," said Dershowitz. "I think unless something comes up that we're not aware of, I'm pretty sure he will be confirmed."

Meanwhile, the country's leaders should be confirming the most qualified people for the higher court without regard to political benefit or gain, said the law professor.

"That's not the way the framers contemplated justices being nominated and confirmed to the Supreme Court," he said. "They had in mind the very best people."

But now, the matter of a Supreme Court justice is "completely political," but all senators should keep an open mind, Dershowitz commented.

"It's all because of Merrick Garland," he said, referring to President Barack Obama's nominee who was blocked in 2016 because of the looming election.

"It's completely political and all senators should keep an open mind," said Dershowitz. "Interview Kavanaugh. Wait to see what he thinks of the tower of precedent, whether he will start overruling cases, and then cast their vote on the basis of the quality of the candidate, not the political advantage or disadvantage they get from voting one way or the other."

Meanwhile, Vice President Mike Pence over the weekend praised Kavanaugh as a nominee who will pay attention to the strict construction of the Constitution, but Dershowitz said such phrases have become a cliche.

"In Bush versus Gore, the conservatives stretched the Constitution to apply equal protection analysis to the way ballots were counted, s each side stretches the Constitution when it serves their interest and reads it narrowly when it serves their interest," said Dershowitz.

Meanwhile, the United States is looking for a person who could potentially be a justice for 20 or 30 years, and nobody knows what the issues will be then, said the professor.

"Abortion may be off the table and we may have developed technologies to eliminate the need for abortion," said Dershowitz. "Gay rights probably will be an issue of historic interest. We don't know what the issues will be.

"That's why we need the most qualified, brilliant, academic, serious people serving on the court without regard to what their current political interests are. Justices tend to change over time."

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/alan-dershowitz-brett-kavanaugh-supreme-court-confirmation/2018/07/30/id/874503/

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63727
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Examining the top contenders on Trump's Supreme Court list
« Reply #84 on: July 30, 2018, 03:24:04 PM »
Sen. Rand Paul Supports Trump High Court Nominee
Monday, 30 July 2018

Republican Senator Rand Paul said Monday he will support President Donald Trump's nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to fill a vacancy on the Supreme Court, after expressing concerns about his position on privacy issues.

"After meeting Judge Kavanaugh and reviewing his record, I have decided to support his nomination," Paul said in a series of Twitter posts explaining his decision.

. . .

https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/rand-paul-kavanaugh/2018/07/30/id/874497/