Author Topic: Could Phil had been Classic Mr. O with his structural flaws?  (Read 1132 times)

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40804
  • Child of Y'srael
Could Phil had been Classic Mr. O with his structural flaws?
« on: December 09, 2017, 02:52:39 PM »
Keep in mind the following for IFBB Classic Mr. O shows. No thong, so no shredded glutes. The following poses are also not in Classic. Front Lat Spread, Rear Lat Spread and most muscular.

Phil is 5'9 so his max bodyweight this year would have been 200. He was very narrow at lower weights.
7

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79201
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Could Phil had been Classic Mr. O with his structural flaws?
« Reply #1 on: December 09, 2017, 02:55:15 PM »
 ???

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40804
  • Child of Y'srael
Re: Could Phil had been Classic Mr. O with his structural flaws?
« Reply #2 on: December 09, 2017, 02:58:10 PM »
???

His narrowness would kill him in classic. He can't just put on weight. He had the arms and legs. Back was a weak point at lower weight as well. It would have been interesting to see how a lot 200lb Phil with Classic Mr. O in mind would have turned out.
7

robcguns

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19016
  • Founder of the proud straight white male movement
Re: Could Phil had been Classic Mr. O with his structural flaws?
« Reply #3 on: December 09, 2017, 03:27:41 PM »
???

That pic of Phil is awesome.Arm dominant which is the best look imo.i think he would kill in any class.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79201
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Could Phil had been Classic Mr. O with his structural flaws?
« Reply #4 on: December 09, 2017, 03:45:24 PM »
His narrowness would kill him in classic. He can't just put on weight. He had the arms and legs. Back was a weak point at lower weight as well. It would have been interesting to see how a lot 200lb Phil with Classic Mr. O in mind would have turned out.

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40804
  • Child of Y'srael
Re: Could Phil had been Classic Mr. O with his structural flaws?
« Reply #5 on: December 09, 2017, 04:00:51 PM »


ND you're on of the few that can assess a physique properly, what say you?
7

Nether Animal

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13813
  • Team Mower Forever

Fortress

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19940
Re: Could Phil had been Classic Mr. O with his structural flaws?
« Reply #7 on: December 09, 2017, 05:25:23 PM »
His muscular bulk hides his very obvious structural flaws.

So, no.