Author Topic: John Paul Stevens: Repeal the Second Amendment  (Read 13615 times)

Agnostic007

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15439
Re: John Paul Stevens: Repeal the Second Amendment
« Reply #50 on: March 29, 2018, 09:34:49 PM »
I'm terrified.  What are you 10 years old?  Are we going to meet after school?  lol 

behind the church

Agnostic007

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15439
Re: John Paul Stevens: Repeal the Second Amendment
« Reply #51 on: March 29, 2018, 09:46:10 PM »
Fabio was on Carlson tonight, did you catch that? Amazing!

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: John Paul Stevens: Repeal the Second Amendment
« Reply #52 on: March 29, 2018, 10:11:38 PM »
Sometimes I can't help but to believe the anti-gun crew really doesn't understand the whole story, or why the pro-gun individuals think as they think.  As invaluable as guns are for protection and peaceful mind on a daily basis, especially with a family - which is more than enough reason - they serve a much higher purpose, as well.

They raise a barrier against those who'd try to falsely play the "good guy" in ANY unreasonable, mass effort which may involve, for instance, trying to contain or (more likely) remove families on or from their property.  Of course, greater force can be applied to those people, to kill them, as the naysayers so love to point out - (maybe they'll be killed by lazer beam!! or mini-nuke!!) - and that's not in question.  

Once the killing starts, however, the trusty "good guy" act of authority can no longer be used.  But, see, it's viewed as much too valuable to lose.  The only thing wrong-doers have to hope to sway us, at the moment, is that act.  Their concern for children is heart-warming, and all. (lol)

As of this date and time, that "good guy" act has been far-and-away the most powerful tool ever used against us.  It isn't going to suddenly disappear if the user can continue to use it.

That's why guns, and lots of guns, in OUR hands, are so important.  Because someday, that bluff may be called.  All signs say it will.  So don't give up those guns - the nation's children are NOT at risk for you having them.  Quite the opposite: their risk is actually reduced.

Agnostic007

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15439
Re: John Paul Stevens: Repeal the Second Amendment
« Reply #53 on: March 29, 2018, 10:17:01 PM »
Sometimes I can't help but to believe the anti-gun crew really doesn't understand the whole story, or why the pro-gun individuals think as they think.  As invaluable as guns are for protection and peaceful mind on a daily basis, especially with a family - which is more than enough reason - they serve a much higher purpose, as well.

They raise a barrier against those who'd try to falsely play the "good guy" in ANY unreasonable, mass effort which may involve, for instance, trying to contain or (more likely) remove families on or from their property.  Of course, greater force can be applied to those people, to kill them, as the naysayers so love to point out - (maybe they'll be killed by lazer beam!! or mini-nuke!!) - and that's not in question.  

Once the killing starts, however, the trusty "good guy" act of authority can no longer be used.  But, see, it's viewed as much too valuable to lose.  The only thing wrong-doers have to hope to sway us, at the moment, is that act.  Their concern for children is heart-warming, and all. (lol)

As of this date and time, that "good guy" act has been far-and-away the most powerful tool ever used against us.  It isn't going to suddenly disappear if the user can continue to use it.

That's why guns, and lots of guns, in OUR hands, are so important.  Because someday, that bluff may be called.  All signs say it will.  So don't give up those guns - the nation's children are NOT at risk for you having them.  Quite the opposite: their risk is actually reduced.

Not to simplify your post.. but does the good guy with a gun need an Ar 15 to protect his family, and does he need a high capacity round? Because for the most part, that is the argument.

Yamcha

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13292
  • Fundie
Re: John Paul Stevens: Repeal the Second Amendment
« Reply #54 on: March 30, 2018, 02:47:05 AM »
behind the church

careful or you might end up electrocuted by Pence
a

Kazan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6799
  • Sic vis pacem, parabellum
Re: John Paul Stevens: Repeal the Second Amendment
« Reply #55 on: March 30, 2018, 08:18:55 AM »
Not to simplify your post.. but does the good guy with a gun need an Ar 15 to protect his family, and does he need a high capacity round? Because for the most part, that is the argument.

How about it's none of your fucking business what and how many weapons I have
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41757
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: John Paul Stevens: Repeal the Second Amendment
« Reply #56 on: March 30, 2018, 08:21:24 AM »
How about it's none of your fucking business what and how many weapons I have

He is a cop - a fake ass cop at that -  part of the nanny state that feeds off the tax dollars of those of us who actually produce revenue for the society. 

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66394
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: John Paul Stevens: Repeal the Second Amendment
« Reply #57 on: March 30, 2018, 08:55:04 AM »
Fabio was on Carlson tonight, did you catch that? Amazing!

Yes, Fabio was on Tucker Carlson last night.  The seventh of seven guests on his show.  He started with a commentary about the FBI briefing Obama about Russia with conservative Byron York as his first guest.

Followed by a report by Griff Jenkins about California's illegal alien problem.

He then had liberal Cathy Areu on to discuss illegal aliens being allowed to vote (something she supports).

This was followed by of his interview of liberal Jennifer Palmieri to discuss gun control.

Then he had liberal Richard Goodstein to discuss gun control.  

Followed by another excerpt of his interview with Jennifer Palmieri.

Then conservative Mark Steyn to discuss Palmieri.

Then had Fabio on to talk about his experience as a California resident.  

The show ended with two Fox reporters playing the Final Exam game answering political questions.  

Now, if you watched the show, you would know of all this.  But if you're a dishonest liberal hack, the show was just about Fabio.  

Like I said, come correct.   :)

Agnostic007

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15439
Re: John Paul Stevens: Repeal the Second Amendment
« Reply #58 on: March 30, 2018, 10:31:32 AM »
How about it's none of your fucking business what and how many weapons I have

That certainly is one way to discuss it. Do you happen to own a Thompson Machine gun? Perhaps a sawed off shot gun? 

Agnostic007

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15439
Re: John Paul Stevens: Repeal the Second Amendment
« Reply #59 on: March 30, 2018, 10:33:28 AM »
He is a cop - a fake ass cop at that -  part of the nanny state that feeds off the tax dollars of those of us who actually produce revenue for the society. 

I often wonder how you function as a lawyer. Your demeanor, writing and thought process doesn't really make me think "lawyer" or even "white collar" but I don't doubt you are what you claim to be.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41757
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: John Paul Stevens: Repeal the Second Amendment
« Reply #60 on: March 30, 2018, 10:42:34 AM »
I often wonder how you function as a lawyer. Your demeanor, writing and thought process doesn't really make me think "lawyer" or even "white collar" but I don't doubt you are what you claim to be.

My thought process is perfectly fine.   Like myself and others have said - never ever have come across a left wing crack pot cop before so into the far left wing nuttiness - but so be it. 

Kazan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6799
  • Sic vis pacem, parabellum
Re: John Paul Stevens: Repeal the Second Amendment
« Reply #61 on: March 30, 2018, 10:51:17 AM »
That certainly is one way to discuss it. Do you happen to own a Thompson Machine gun? Perhaps a sawed off shot gun?  

There is nothing to discuss the 2nd amendment is the law, so it is exactly none of your fucking business what I own, donut muncher.

The more I read about what James Madison has written about why the bill of rights exist, the more i believe any infringement by the government is unconstitutional.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

Agnostic007

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15439
Re: John Paul Stevens: Repeal the Second Amendment
« Reply #62 on: March 30, 2018, 10:59:45 AM »
There is nothing to discuss the 2nd amendment is the law, so it is exactly none of your fucking business what I own, donut muncher.

The more I read about what James Madison has written about why the bill of rights exist, the more i believe any infringement by the government is unconstitutional.

 :)

Agnostic007

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15439
Re: John Paul Stevens: Repeal the Second Amendment
« Reply #63 on: March 30, 2018, 11:02:35 AM »
My thought process is perfectly fine.   Like myself and others have said - never ever have come across a left wing crack pot cop before so into the far left wing nuttiness - but so be it. 

By left wing you must mean someone who questions whether military style weapons designed solely to kill humans needs to be a part of our personal arsenal? Why high capacity magazines are required? Ok guilty of being a left wing crack pot.  ::)

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41757
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: John Paul Stevens: Repeal the Second Amendment
« Reply #64 on: March 30, 2018, 11:06:42 AM »
By left wing you must mean someone who questions whether military style weapons designed solely to kill humans needs to be a part of our personal arsenal? Why high capacity magazines are required? Ok guilty of being a left wing crack pot.  ::)

Do you consider all semi auto firearms are military style?  or is it just how they look? 

Kazan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6799
  • Sic vis pacem, parabellum
Re: John Paul Stevens: Repeal the Second Amendment
« Reply #65 on: March 30, 2018, 11:08:58 AM »
Do you consider all semi auto firearms are military style?  or is it just how they look? 

Don't even bother with this assclown, the AR-15 has been around since 1959, now all of the sudden its an unmatched death machine.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41757
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: John Paul Stevens: Repeal the Second Amendment
« Reply #66 on: March 30, 2018, 11:14:26 AM »
Don't even bother with this assclown, the AR-15 has been around since 1959, now all of the sudden its an unmatched death machine.

Its no different than someone still thinking a dragster w a replaced 4 cylinder engine is still a dragster.  Functionally, an AR15 is no different than any other weapon out there.

But to some it looks scary therefore it must be banned.   

Kazan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6799
  • Sic vis pacem, parabellum
Re: John Paul Stevens: Repeal the Second Amendment
« Reply #67 on: March 30, 2018, 11:16:48 AM »
Its no different than someone still thinking a dragster w a replaced 4 cylinder engine is still a dragster.  Functionally, an AR15 is no different than any other weapon out there.

But to some it looks scary therefore it must be banned.   

Yep he just repeats all the buzz words, they mean absolutely nothing but boy they sound good.

Then there is this.............
https://medium.com/@bjcampbell/everybodys-lying-about-the-link-between-gun-ownership-and-homicide-1108ed400be5
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41757
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: John Paul Stevens: Repeal the Second Amendment
« Reply #68 on: March 30, 2018, 11:29:13 AM »
Yep he just repeats all the buzz words, they mean absolutely nothing but boy they sound good.

Then there is this.............
https://medium.com/@bjcampbell/everybodys-lying-about-the-link-between-gun-ownership-and-homicide-1108ed400be5

Its astounding the money we pay to "law enforcement" who are shown over and over and over to be incompetent and next to useless in stopping crimes and the response by these ass-clowns is to relinquish our rights.  The cops, sheriff, FBI - etc they are to blame for that Florida mess, not the NRA.   

Kazan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6799
  • Sic vis pacem, parabellum
Re: John Paul Stevens: Repeal the Second Amendment
« Reply #69 on: March 30, 2018, 11:45:54 AM »
Its astounding the money we pay to "law enforcement" who are shown over and over and over to be incompetent and next to useless in stopping crimes and the response by these ass-clowns is to relinquish our rights.  The cops, sheriff, FBI - etc they are to blame for that Florida mess, not the NRA.   

The supreme court has ruled that the police have no duty to protect you, they are there to enforce the law. So all you shelter in place and
 wait for the police to be executed, good luck. People have decided to surrender their right to self defense in hopes that someone else is going to do it.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66394
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: John Paul Stevens: Repeal the Second Amendment
« Reply #70 on: March 30, 2018, 01:04:58 PM »
How about it's none of your fucking business what and how many weapons I have

Precisely. 

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: John Paul Stevens: Repeal the Second Amendment
« Reply #71 on: March 30, 2018, 02:36:26 PM »
Not to simplify your post.. but does the good guy with a gun need an Ar 15 to protect his family, and does he need a high capacity round? Because for the most part, that is the argument.

Due to an attempt to take them away?  If so, then your question should ask why it's happening.

Because without a reasonable explanation, the answer to your actual question is obvious.  Yes, he may figure on needing those things.

That's the sad (but true) reality.  The go-to response of "why let people do this?" and "why let people do that" isn't valid to a serious person.

Agnostic007

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15439
Re: John Paul Stevens: Repeal the Second Amendment
« Reply #72 on: March 30, 2018, 04:27:58 PM »
Do you consider all semi auto firearms are military style?  or is it just how they look? 

If it was designed with the sole purpose of killing humans like the M-16, Thompson, and AK-47 that would be military style.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66394
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: John Paul Stevens: Repeal the Second Amendment
« Reply #73 on: March 30, 2018, 04:31:10 PM »
If it was designed with the sole purpose of killing humans like the M-16, Thompson, and AK-47 that would be military style.

Handguns, the weapon of choice for mass murderers in the U.S., are designed with the sole purpose of killing humans.  Other than hunting rifles, you can say that about all firearms. 

Agnostic007

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15439
Re: John Paul Stevens: Repeal the Second Amendment
« Reply #74 on: March 30, 2018, 04:34:12 PM »
Handguns, the weapon of choice for mass murderers in the U.S., are designed with the sole purpose of killing humans.  Other than hunting rifles, you can say that about all firearms. 

That is a good point and I should have qualified the description by adding long rifle.