Author Topic: Mentzer vs Viator  (Read 9068 times)

LanceD

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 335
Re: Mentzer vs Viator
« Reply #75 on: April 28, 2018, 02:47:33 PM »
Weak chest?



Yes both men were known for their leg and calf and biceps development, looking at both of their front double bicep pose and
the chest is very thin and weak compared to their relatively thick torsos.

NotMrAverage

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2168
  • SCHPORT
Re: Mentzer vs Viator
« Reply #76 on: April 29, 2018, 07:44:39 AM »
Also not to be forgotten Mentzer was weak in the back department. He might have been able to develop his chest and back if he didnt departure into drugs at an early age...
MIRAGETROPIN

oldschoolfan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5795
Re: Mentzer vs Viator
« Reply #77 on: April 29, 2018, 08:27:56 AM »
mike looked better than casey ,  bear in mind casey had like an 8 or 9 year gap between contests. he worked for arthur jones until 1979 i beleive

BSN

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2878
Re: Mentzer vs Viator
« Reply #78 on: April 29, 2018, 08:38:19 AM »
1978 World Amateur Championships

dj181

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26498
  • Dog sees 🐿️
Re: Mentzer vs Viator
« Reply #79 on: April 29, 2018, 09:41:18 AM »
Yes both men were known for their leg and calf and biceps development, looking at both of their front double bicep pose and
the chest is very thin and weak compared to their relatively thick torsos.

And dykes triceps were otherworldly