Author Topic: What was Trump hinting at here?  (Read 3002 times)

lilhawk1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1083
Re: What was Trump hinting at here?
« Reply #25 on: May 23, 2018, 06:07:19 PM »
Hopefully make the attempt to abolish Roe v. Waded and/Defund PPL

You do realize that abortion is a very, very small percentage of what planned parenthood does don't you?  Well, actually you probably don't.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63977
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: What was Trump hinting at here?
« Reply #26 on: May 23, 2018, 06:16:47 PM »
You do realize that abortion is a very, very small percentage of what planned parenthood does don't you?  Well, actually you probably don't.

A small percentage, but we're talking about over 300,000 babies a year. 

Agnostic007

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15042
Re: What was Trump hinting at here?
« Reply #27 on: May 23, 2018, 06:41:49 PM »
Leave it to a liberal to put a price on life.

Please answer the question

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 59954
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: What was Trump hinting at here?
« Reply #28 on: May 23, 2018, 06:47:22 PM »
Coach, are you for government supporting those babies if born, to mothers who can't afford to support them?

Yes. You don't terminate a life just because the mother can't afford it. She knew the risks. If someone cannot afford a child (which a cop out in itself) there are PLENTY of worthy want to be parents that would love to have child to ADOPT.

Agnostic007

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15042
Re: What was Trump hinting at here?
« Reply #29 on: May 23, 2018, 06:48:56 PM »
Yes. You don't terminate a life just because the mother can't afford it. She knew the risks. If someone cannot afford a child (which a cop out in itself) there are PLENTY of worthy want to be parents that would love to have child to ADOPT.

So how many people do you think right now are waiting for adoption?

chaos

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 57827
  • Ron "There is no freedom of speech here" Avidan
Re: What was Trump hinting at here?
« Reply #30 on: May 23, 2018, 06:50:59 PM »
So how many people do you think right now are waiting for adoption?
A lot.
Liar!!!!Filt!!!!

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 59954
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: What was Trump hinting at here?
« Reply #31 on: May 23, 2018, 09:24:20 PM »
LOL, good one Coach  ;D

Maybe one day, I'll go back to school and learn some science. ;)
Until then, I hope you science experts will excuse my ignorance.

Might not be a bad idea.

loco

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19164
  • loco like a fox
Re: What was Trump hinting at here?
« Reply #32 on: May 24, 2018, 03:49:32 AM »
In my judgement:
1. After 16 weeks, if a woman hasn't made up her mind , she loses the choice.

2. Some think it's a baby at the moment of conception. Others don't think it's baby until it is born.
I look at this from a medical science standard and feel at 16 weeks , it's developed .

This has been debated and was settled in the supreme Ct .
To the SCOTUS at that time, the biggest factor was the issues of personal privacy with one's own body.

In order to change that, a fetus in the womb would need to be legally classified as a person.
Some states ( Miss.) have tried to pass this , but, it's been defeated for various reasons.

So you aren't really pro-choice.  You're saying women have NO CHOICE past 16 weeks pregnancy.

You want to force women to carry to term if pregnancy is past 16 weeks.

loco

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19164
  • loco like a fox
Re: What was Trump hinting at here?
« Reply #33 on: May 24, 2018, 05:52:06 AM »
Without clearly defined laws, a civil society can't exist.

My guidelines on this are :
1. legal abortion : conception to 16 weeks

Obviously, others won't agree and you have debate.
The US congress has 435 house reps and a 100 senators, plus the President.
Each one has their own ideas and proposed guidelines.

The issue gets debated ,written up as a bill and put up for a vote.
If the Postus agrees with both houses of congress , he signs it and makes it law.

If that law fails to pass constitutional scrutiny, the supreme Ct can rule against it IF the law is
broken and then appealed.




Right.  So your guideline isn't really pro-choice, and neither are you really.

loco

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19164
  • loco like a fox
Re: What was Trump hinting at here?
« Reply #34 on: May 24, 2018, 10:13:26 AM »
I make up my own mind and refuse to blondly follow anyone "just because "

Except for that time you said you voted for Hillary only because your dying mother asked you to.