i had the video saved on my old computer... but you see JFK kneeling over in pain before the head shot... some say the driver pointed a pistol( through the seats) and shot him without it being noticeable.. look at the video..why is he kneeling over in pain and Jackie grabbing him??? then BAM!! headshot.
1
heres the best one i could find in a short notice... but i had a better view point video on my old cpu.. notice how he leans over and Jackie grabs him... he was shot in the midsection somewhere first.. or he just happened to have massive diarrhea before the head shot
Or as it has been proved, he were shot through the neck just before the fatal shot which opens his skull. It is all in the Zapruders film, there is even frame by frame - analyse about it, so morons wouldn't have try to analyse it with their pea size brains.
Did you know that there were dozen of test shooters who were able to duplicate shots fired by Oswald? But you have read at least hundreds of times about those who didn't manage to do it, haven't you? You see, it's better news material if they cannot do it, than if they can. It sell more paper that way, but if you write that "it was easy, anyone could do it", it isn't interesting at all. One of the basic rules in this world is "it is wrong to let stupid people to keep their money", so if you write papers filled with bullshit they are eager to believe, they buy your papers and you get their money. It is simple as that.
Most of your knowledge about the matter is bullshit which the editors have wrote to sell their newspaper, and it is based on their opinion, not on facts. Why? At that time there were no other channels than news releases. When Bugliosi start his investigation for his book, he was amazed how much complete lies newspapers publish at that time, and he were able to find the roots of most of the tin foil hat claims from that pile of crap. Newspaper editor writes that xx FBI sharpshooters didn't manage to duplicate Oswalds shots, and leave out that xx manage to do it without any problems, and 60 years later it is still a fact for imbeciles, no matter if the truth has been all this time in the official report. But who reads the official report, when it has been claimed to be full of lies? Claimed by the newspaper editors, who sell lies to the simple people to get their money.
Just like the moronic theory where the driver turns around and in milliseconds take a shot to JFK:s forehead. Shot which is complete unnoticeable by the 5 passengers, by that second agent at the front seat, by all those dozens of agents and policemen running towards the car. They have to invent the invisible gun and completely silent cartridge, and that agent have to train weeks and weeks to throw the shot in that time frame, but it has to be true because you read it from the internet? Fuck the facts and reality, driver turns around and shoot and he is so fucking fast that no one doesn't see him to do it, no one see the gun or it's muzzle flash, no one hear that 120 dB sound of gunshot, because they all are complete morons...or it is just another piece of bullshit? It was in the papers that xx FBI sharpshooters didn't manage to make those shots = Oswald didn't shoot = fatal shot need some kind of explanation = let just use our imagination and make up some moronic theory
