Kerry Meeting With Iran to Salvage Nuke Deal With Rogue Diplomacy

[Coach is Back!]

Sounds like this should be investigated for collusion. Treason

https://freebeacon.com/national-security/kerry-meeting-iran-salvage-nuke-deal-rogue-diplomacy/

[IroNat]

WTF?

Put him jail.

[Straw Man]

Sounds like this should be investigated for collusion. Treason

https://freebeacon.com/national-security/kerry-meeting-iran-salvage-nuke-deal-rogue-diplomacy/

Wrong...as usual

[Pray_4_War]

They should put him in jail for being an incompetent pussy.

[chaos]

adding that he has been conducting sensitive diplomacy without the current administration's authorization.

LOL, any kind of deal he would try to make would be null and void. Iran is retarded if they try to make a deal with this asshole and hold the US to it. LOL

[Dos Equis]

Does not surprise me.  Once a traitor . . . .

[Coach is Back!]

https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Logan+Act

Strawman is a fucktard

[Irongrip400]

Wrong...as usual

What's he wrong about, the collusion part or the treason part?  Either way, the thread title is correct as the very quote from Kerry states he has been doing just that.

from the article:
"I think I've seen him three or four times," Kerry said, adding that he has been conducting sensitive diplomacy without the current administration's authorization. Kerry said he has criticized the current administration in these discussions, chiding it for not pursuing negotiations from Iran, despite the country's fevered rhetoric about the U.S. president.

[chaos]

What's he wrong about, the collusion part or the treason part?  Either way, the thread title is correct as the very quote from Kerry states he has been doing just that.

from the article:
"I think I've seen him three or four times," Kerry said, adding that he has been conducting sensitive diplomacy without the current administration's authorization. Kerry said he has criticized the current administration in these discussions, chiding it for not pursuing negotiations from Iran, despite the country's fevered rhetoric about the U.S. president.

It amazes me that demoncrats are so intent on supporting countries in the middle east that absolutely hate us and chant death to America every chance they get, even after we give them millions of dollars, yet demoncrats are all up in arms when Trump tries to make peace with NK or Russia, which costs us what?

[SOMEPARTS]

Does this mean they are going to sign something...or adhere to anything?

I mean, talk about not doing something right the first time.

[Irongrip400]

It amazes me that demoncrats are so intent on supporting countries in the middle east that absolutely hate us and chant death to America every chance they get, even after we give them millions of dollars, yet demoncrats are all up in arms when Trump tries to make peace with NK or Russia, which costs us what?

Not sure what the cost is if any really.  I think they just don't like the way he goes about doing it.  I understand there is a bit if self serving-ness and sleeze associated with Trump, but if the destination is the same, and no one is hurt in the process, what difference does it make his reasons?  None of the politicians are doing it for altruistic reasons, except maybe Bernie, and that's because he's a loon.