No, she’s not a democrat. She’s a liberal socialist. Huge difference.
You've always had a penchant for regurgitating (poorly, might I add) bits and pieces from last day's talk radio and an almost worrying inability to formulate a single coherent thought in support of even rudimentary positions; coupled with your strained relationship with the truth and objective facts and I felt inclined to read more about this Sinema character. I started from a blank slate since I knew nothing about her before this exercise.
Objective facts suggest that she's slightly left of center and hardly a socialist. Wikipedia (which isn't necessarily an objective source, but at least links to several sources from which we can draw our own conclusions) has this bit: "
According to National Journal's 2013 Vote Ratings, her votes place her near the center of their liberal-conservative scale. The National Journal gave her a composite ideology score of 57% liberal and 43% conservative." Hardly "socialist".
But maybe that's just not an accurate description. I mean it is from Wikipedia, right? Luckily her actual votes are a matter of public record and they seem to quite unlike what the votes of a "liberal socialist" would be. Again according to Wikipedia, she voted in line with Trump's position approximately half the time and "the conservative Goldwater Institute gave her a 35% in 2010 when she was a state legislator; the progressive Americans for Democratic Action gave her a 60% liberal quotient."
So she seems, by all accounts, to be just left of center. Her political positions are unmistakably democrat, but she's no Bernie Sanders and doesn't appear to be a socialist anymore than than you appear to be intelligent.