Report: Obama White House Orchestrated Clinton Email Cover Up

[Coach is Back!]

https://pjmedia.com/trending/judicial-watch-obama-white-house-orchestrated-clinton-email-cover-up/

[Prudence]

Points worth mentioning...
None of that is an official White House statement so it's now an opinion piece. You said yourself you don't give a shit about opinion pieces.
While reading that link---I clicked to see THEIR source. It's a site called Judicial Watch. Poked around that site for a bit --didn't take long to see it's a super pro Trump-pro Republican site. Of course they see it that way.
OIG January 2016 Report State FOIA Process
https://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/oig-january-2016-report-state-foia-process/
January 2016? Almost 3 and a half years and they're STILL not able to show...what's the word??? There's a word...oh yeah:
:::: P R O O F ::::

[Coach is Back!]

https://www.theblaze.com/news/barr-investigation-into-surveillance


https://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/oig-january-2016-report-state-foia-process/

https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/weekly-updates/obama-wh-tied-clinton-email-cover-up/

[Prudence]

https://www.theblaze.com/news/barr-investigation-into-surveillance
"The Office of the Inspector General has a pending investigation of the FISA process in the Russian investigation, and I expect that that will be complete in probably in May or June, I am told," said Barr during congressional testimony Tuesday.
So if this IS going on--why did he start a NEW investigation just yesterday? I'm confused. Genuine question

https://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/oig-january-2016-report-state-foia-process/
That's the page I referenced in my previous post.


https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/weekly-updates/obama-wh-tied-clinton-email-cover-up/
Now we have obtained 44 pages of records from the State Department through court-ordered discovery revealing that the Obama White House was tracking a December 2012 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request seeking records concerning Clinton’s use of an unsecure, non-government email system.
Now THIS looks interesting. It's 44 pages--BOAT LOADS of redactions. I tried downloading so it's easier for me to read--but it's not working. I'm gonna read this. It APPEARS to be numerous emails about a court case involving that website Judicial Watch...Not sure tho..I'm gonna open this on my other PC..brb

From: Finnegan, Karen M
Sent: Wednesday, August 07,2013 4:10 PM
To: Walter, Sheryl L; Hermesman, Geoffrey F; Scholl, Patrick D; Hackett, John; Manheim, Marianne J
Subject: RE: IPS Significant FOIA Report
Sheryl: To follow-up on my early response, Cristina is handling the Judicial Watch case, CA No. 2013-772 (DOC) (J. KollarKotelly), that seeks access to all communications (including e-mail) between the Department and President Clinton
and/or his foundation regarding clearing his speeches. We don't believe that this case necessarily includes Secretary
Clinton's e-mails.
Karen
This email is UNCLASSIFIED.

[Prudence]

Real quick tho--like I said before--If Obama/Clinton turns up dirty--I hope Trump nails em to the fucking wall.
Honestly.
All of Washington should be looked into.
brb
Thanks for the links Coach

[Prudence]

ok...I dont know what to make of those 44 pages...nothing earth shattering...nothing at all really.

[Board_SHERIF]

exonerated before crooked Hillary was even interview...yes Little Miss Fake News still can not get it 

[Prudence]

Very similar to the way they speak of anything that goes against Idiot.
Where there's smoke there's fire. Everything ...EVERYTHING has to be looked in to.
Checks and balances. There is no "this is over" bullshit. It's over when every aspect of it has been looked into.

[Coach is Back!]

I skimmed the link  and have no idea if it's legit or not.
BUT it amazes me how Trumpers think we need to "move on" with the Mueller investigation
but rehash stuff when Hillary was sec of state 7 years ago? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm?

 I don’t think you did Howard otherwise she would’ve open the links that led to the judicial watch his investigation that was obtained through the freedom of information act so if you’re saying that the freedom of information act is not reliable then nobody can help you but you can go ahead keep on thinking what you want what Hillary did was in fact treasonous what Hillary did was in fact has hard evidence That she violated the espionage act this is what happens when you listen to the mainstream media that consistently suppresses information

[Coach is Back!]

It’s not like reading an article or listening to liberal panelists on main stream media that consistently bring up sources said they can’t provide a source obviously PJ media and judicial watch provided the source by inserting the links of proof from the freedom of information  it’s not like reading an article or listening to liberal panelists on mainstream media that consistently bring up sources said they can’t provide a source obviously PJ media and judicial watch provided the source by inserting the links of proof from the freedom of information act