Mueller to testify publicly on July 17 following a subpoena

[Irongrip400]

all he has to do is say exactly what is in the report and that will be enough

I'm sure you're aware (or perhaps not) that there are a bunch of Trump supporters in the country who think the report exonerated Trump.

We saw proof of that at Justin Amash's town hall last month

Here's a link in case you missed it:
https://www.vox.com/2019/5/30/18646048/republican-protect-trump-mueller-report-amash

Trumptards who only watch conservative news sources have no clue about the report and with Mueller testifying publicly the facts will have to be reported again.

It may not penetrate into the brain of all Trumptard (especially those with their heads up their ass) but just repeating the facts over and over is worth the effort

You'll know this is true by the way Trump will whine and bitch about it when it happens

Without using any derogatory words like “trumptard”, do you actually think that Muellers testimony will change anything? I don’t at all, just like all of the people saying “she’s going to go to jail” when any of these little tidbits come out about her (Hilary) being crooked etc.

[chaos]

Mueller tried to tell everyone to "READ THE DAMN REPORT!" without actually using those words. He overestimated America's ability to turn off the Bachelor and put down their Tom Clancy novels long enough to read the report. It will be interesting to hear him talk about details in the report during the hearing but once Hannity and Limbaugh declare it all fabricated lies, his base will ignore the information anyway.

And many people read it and saw a ton of speculation and heresy.

[Board_SHERIF]

Mueller tried to tell everyone to "READ THE DAMN REPORT!" without actually using those words. He overestimated America's ability to turn off the Bachelor and put down their Tom Clancy novels long enough to read the report. It will be interesting to hear him talk about details in the report during the hearing but once Hannity and Limbaugh declare it all fabricated lies, his base will ignore the information anyway.

Pity you did not read or even understand the report 

[Primemuscle]

And many people read it and saw a ton of speculation and heresy.

And what did you see when you read the report?

[chaos]

And what did you see when you read the report?

Speculation, what ifs, maybes. Just because 2 people say similar things doesn't mean it's true.

[Primemuscle]

Absolutes are hard to come by these days. Maybe this was always the case. Media distortion obscures "Just the facts, ma'am." Trump has difficulty being truthful, but so do most other politicians. It's a shame that lying is generally acceptable in contemporary western culture. There was a time when telling a lie was just about the greatest sin anyone could commit.

[Agnostic007]

And many people read it and saw a ton of speculation and heresy.

you are confusing what you were told (speculation and hearsay, or maybe you did mean heresy since it speaks ill of Trump) and what the report actually contains. Read it sometime..

[Agnostic007]

You do know the Steele Dossier was Clinton opposition research, right?  That was the one document they used over and over to get judges to rule for them.  Nothing happened to Trump before and nothing will after this.  Why do you libtards continually set yourselves up for disappointment?  You remind me of Wylie Coyote continuously fucking himself over and over trying to catch Road Runner.

You must be new to reading my posts if you think I think anything will come of it.

[Grape Ape]

you are confusing what you were told (speculation and hearsay, or maybe you did mean heresy since it speaks ill of Trump) and what the report actually contains. Read it sometime..

Was Barr's assessment incorrect?

[chaos]

you are confusing what you were told (speculation and hearsay, or maybe you did mean heresy since it speaks ill of Trump) and what the report actually contains. Read it sometime..

I'm not surprised your blinders took over when you read that sham of a report, you have a history of prejudices towards people that don't hold the same beliefs as you.

[Agnostic007]

I'm not surprised your blinders took over when you read that sham of a report, you have a history of prejudices towards people that don't hold the same beliefs as you.

And as predicted "sham of a report".. Who would have thought a Trump supporter wouldn't believe a negative report on the Trumpster by a republican Special Counsel appointed by a Republican appointed by Trump  

[AbrahamG]

Was Barr's assessment incorrect?

At best it was misleading at worst it was corrupt.

[Board_SHERIF]

At best it was misleading at worst it was corrupt.

tell us why..................... ........................ ........silence.

[Agnostic007]

tell us why..................... ........................ ........silence.

silence is what you would hear if he fell for your game. you know and he knows he would be wasting his time

[chaos]

And as predicted "sham of a report".. Who would have thought a Trump supporter wouldn't believe a negative report on the Trumpster by a republican Special Counsel appointed by a Republican appointed by Trump  

Are you saying you don't think republicans are corrupt?