David Icke live, taken down from Youytube 97k viewing, still available here

[Megalodon]

Hs IQ really doesn't matter and I don't even know why its up for discussion.

I am sure Jordan Peterson is established and intelligent in his chosen profession.

My beef with him is that he got caught up in the hype and started to discuss areas in which he is not an expert in (e.g., history, nutrition).

Peterson initiated the discussion by falsely asserting that he had a 150+ IQ.

He's established and intelligent in his own profession but got caught up in his own hype and, with deceitful intent, grossly exaggerated his intelligence quotient score.

[friedchickendinner]

Never discuss areas where you are not an expert!

not a problem for getbiggers like yourself

but for others, thats good advice!!

[SF1900]

Peterson initiated the discussion by falsely asserting that he had a 150+ IQ.

He's established and intelligent in his own profession but got caught up in his own hype and, with deceitful intent, grossly exaggerated his intelligence quotient score.

Fair enough, and I agree.

He should just stick with what he knows.

But....more content = more money.

Megalodon, I took a real IQ test, the WAIS-IV and scored a 111. I am not up to getbig standards. 

[Megalodon]

I agree.

He should just stick with what he knows.

But....more content = more money.

Megalodon, I took a real IQ test, the WAIS-IV and scored a 111. I am not up to getbig standards. 

111 is a palindrome and can only be good. You are more than up to Getbig standards.

[SF1900]

111 is a palindrome and can only be good. You are more than up to Getbig standards.

haha, I never thought about it like that!! 

[Griffith]

Here's another thing David Icke said in the interview:

He believes 'woke' culture is designed to divide people and is funded by Soros.

[Vince B]

No. Peterson is not brilliant. 


N or an IQ of 120, which fits right beneath his estimated IQ ceiling of 124.

From the way you argue I would estimate that Jordan is at least 40 IQ points higher than yours. He is brilliant.
You cannot talk like he does on so many subjects and not be highly intelligent. Top 1 % for sure.

You have difficulty with comprehension and forming arguments. Just average IQ.

[friedchickendinner]

All the smartest people in the world seems to belong to the conspiracy camp

[Megalodon]

From the way you argue I would estimate that Jordan is at least 40 IQ points higher than yours. He is brilliant.
You cannot talk like he does on so many subjects and not be highly intelligent. Top 1 % for sure.

You have difficulty with comprehension and forming arguments. Just average IQ.

Dear Isaac Newton,

The quote you are disagreeing with was written by 152 IQ'd Hugo Award nominee and Bucknell graduate Vox Day who has written 18 books, including one on Peterson entitled Jordanetics.

Peterson is highly intelligent but 120 does not fall into the 130+ brilliant category.

You have difficulty with reading comprehension and following links, otherwise you would have some clue that the argument, which you had no intelligent response to, was not formulated by me.

Clean your room.

[Vince B]

Dear Isaac Newton,

The quote you are disagreeing with was written by 152 IQ'd Hugo Award nominee and Bucknell graduate Vox Day who has written 18 books, including one on Peterson entitled Jordanetics.

Peterson is highly intelligent but 120 does not fall into the 130+ brilliant category.

You have difficulty with reading comprehension and following links, otherwise you would have some clue that the argument, which you had no intelligent response to, was not formulated by me.

Clean your room.

 

[pellius]

why dont you read my post properly before you comment, it will save you looking stupid

Where have I mentioned Youtube?

You said, "Nothing should be off limits". Nothing? Every business, entity, website should allow anything that others want expressed? That includes Youtube and even this site.

I sometimes wonder what it must be like to go through life totally unaware of just how stupid you really are.

[pellius]

Either way, the video appeared back on Youtube and got 6 million views.

I have no issue with that.

[joswift]

Yet it was you that brought up YouTube. But once again you try to speak with authority of things that you know nothing about. There are indeed "off limits" that's why there are libel laws.

You really are a special kind of stupid.

I know there are, there shouldnt be, thats my point

Your determination to get one over on me is making you look stupid, try and read what I write before commenting

[pellius]

I know there are, there shouldnt be, thats my point

Your determination to get one over on me is making you look stupid, try and read what I write before commenting

Ah, up bright and early and straight to GetBig to reply to my post. This is what you will be doing for years to come.

Difference between you and me is that I tell the truth. You just have to make up lies to try so desperately to save face. You lied about me posting dick pics. You lied about me never having ever mentioned female relationships. You lied about me witnessing and/or participating in a teenager gangbang. You've already admitted that you don't believe in morals. It's just a matter of personal opinion. And it shows. You are a person of zero substance and character. No sense of honor. Just an arrogant, narcissistic, vapid, and hollow person.

[joswift]

So, so clueless. Yes, it is a normal time to be up in the morning. It is not normal that every morning a lonely loser rushes first thing in the morning to get right on to GetBig to check up and reply to someone on a bbing forum trying so hard to seek redemption and acceptance from total strangers. And no, I did not witness any child abuse. Prove it. You just made that up. Another demonstrably lie. Ask anybody that remembers that post. Someone told someone who told me. It was a third-hand verbal report. The issues were that many felt I should have reported it. Again, you have no proof whereas I know there are people out there that can collaborate my story. I can prove it. In fact, that's when I first started butting heads with SF. He was the first one who called me out on that. I disagreed and attacked him for it but the story was never in question. Chaos was another one I remember that was on that thread. Neither will remember that I ever said, nor did I witness, any rape or child abuse. Other than the girl, I never met or knew any of the people involved. Just more classic joswift. Speaking with authority on things he knows nothing about.

"I didnt lie about anything, I made things up"

LOL! More classic joswift. More classic Pellius owning.

[pellius]

Left speechless = check
Lame gif = check
lonely loser = check

[joswift]

Left speechless = check
Lame gif = check
lonely loser = check

[SF1900]

I have no dog in the fight, but Pellius never witnessed anything. He stated that he heard about the incident from someone else who heard about the incident.

Of course, people can draw their own conclusions about what someone should have done from that point forward, but from my recollection he never witnessed anything.

[joswift]

I have no dog in the fight, but Pellius never witnessed anything. He stated that he heard about the incident from someone else who heard about the incident.

Of course, people can draw their own conclusions about what someone should have done from that point forward, but from my recollection he never witnessed anything.

No one cares about your misguided recollection of the events..

He didn't get hounded all over the board for months based on a friend of a friend of a friends half story..

[SF1900]

Dear Isaac Newton,

The quote you are disagreeing with was written by 152 IQ'd Hugo Award nominee and Bucknell graduate Vox Day who has written 18 books, including one on Peterson entitled Jordanetics.

Peterson is highly intelligent but 120 does not fall into the 130+ brilliant category.

You have difficulty with reading comprehension and following links, otherwise you would have some clue that the argument, which you had no intelligent response to, was not formulated by me.

Clean your room.

I don't want to be pedantic, but the words "brilliant" are not used in IQ scoring and the normal feedback sessions when telling someone their IQ results rarely, if ever, entails using the word "brilliant." The term "brilliant" is actually really hard to describe, even in terms of IQ, since the word can entail different meanings.

A 130+ score, would simply be considered in the "Very Superior" range. I would simply tell someone, "Your IQ is in the Very Superior range, which means that you did better than X amount of people on Y task."

The overall IQ score is really important, but its even more important to really see the breakdown of indices on the different domains and subtests. That's where it really  gets interesting.

[Megalodon]

I don't want to be pedantic, but the words "brilliant" are not used in IQ scoring and the normal feedback sessions when telling someone their IQ results rarely, if ever, entails using the word "brilliant." The term "brilliant" is actually really hard to describe, even in terms of IQ, since the word can entail different meanings.

A 130+ score, would simply be considered in the "Very Superior" range. I would simply tell someone, "Your IQ is in the Very Superior range, which means that you did better than X amount of people on Y task."

The overall IQ score is really important, but its even more important to really see the breakdown of indices on the different domains and subtests. That's where it really  gets interesting.

Agreed. I was personally referencing over two standard deviations above average as "brilliant". The main thing I was trying to convey is that Peterson is a charlatan and dishonest. He claimed to have an IQ over three standard deviations above average when his IQ isn't even two standard deviations above the mean.

Peterson isn't interacting on Getbig. Professionally, Peterson speaks on the record, with authority, to paying audiences on subjects he's very far from an expert on. Ignorant young paying audiences suck up information Peterson is ignorant on.   

Peterson Bible expert:
 "Peterson began his public series of lectures on the bible without bothering to read it first." -Vox Day, "Jordanetics"

Yes, Peterson admitted it.

Peterson Marxism expert
"That he hasn't read any Marxist literature becomes obvious early on...That he hasn't read any Marx is even more obvious...Let's not pass by the fact that Peterson doesn't know when the Communist Manifesto was written. He says ''1880 or 1890, whenever Marx wrote it.'' Marx and Engels published it in 1948: a year that nobody remotely familiar with modern European history is likely to overlook. Marx was, of course, dead by 1883.    -Alexander Douglas, "Review of Jordan Peterson's Stupid Lecture"

Peterson Supreme Court expert
"It's not a good thing when there is general discomfort with the manner in which something as important as the naming of a new Chief Justice is undertaken. It doesn't bode well for the stability and peace of the state(and -perhaps- there is nothing to more important to preserve than that)."
 -Jordan Peterson, "Notes on my Kavanaugh Tweet"

    "The fact that a Canadian was offering unsolicited advice to Americans on the composition of their highest legal institution was bad enough. The fact that he was doing so in ignorance of the actual position involved was incredible, especially when one considers that The Honorable John G. Roberts, Jr. is still the Chief Justice of the United States, as he has been since 2005.
   Despite the fact that the nomination and confirmation hearings had been in the news for weeks, Peterson didn't even realize that Judge Kavanaugh was replacing the empty seat on the Supreme Court vacated by the retired Anthony Kennedy, who had served as an Associate Justice since 1988." -Theodore Beale

[Methyl m1ke]

David Icke says some out there stuff as well as truths. Rush Limbaugh used to say "deep state" was kook talk but now literally says "deep state" all the time. Trump used to and still does regard GW Bush as a pile of trash(he is). Now people who loved Bush praise Trump.

Don't let anyone bully you or anyone into telling you what is okay or not ok to listen to. You can listen for meaning, entertainment, different perspectives or whatever.

Icke was one of the most outspoken against Jimmy Saville(extreme molester) when the mainstream media called it conspiracy theory.

FUCK anyone that would try to silence anti-child-molestation speech. Don't wait until speech or thought has to be approved by dimwits until you speak out or have opinions.

Which idiotic, evil, insane FUCKING trash here is for Jimmy Saville...

Allegations of sexual abuse
Main article: Jimmy Savile sexual abuse scandal
During his lifetime
During Savile's lifetime, sporadic allegations of child abuse were made against him dating back to 1963,[106] but these only became widely publicised after his death. Savile claimed the key to his success on Jim'll Fix It had been that he disliked children, although he later admitted to saying this to deflect scrutiny of his personal life. He did not own a computer, claiming that he did not want anybody to think he was downloading child pornography.[2] His autobiography As it Happens (1974, reprinted as Love is an Uphill Thing, 1976) contains admissions of improper sexual conduct which appear to have passed unnoticed during his lifetime.[107]

Former Sex Pistols and Public Image Ltd vocalist John Lydon alluded to sordid conduct committed by Savile, as well as suppression of widely held knowledge about such activity, in an October 1978 interview recorded for BBC Radio 1. Lydon stated: "I'd like to kill Jimmy Savile; I think he's a hypocrite. I bet he's into all kinds of seediness that we all know about, but are not allowed to talk about. I know some rumours." He added: "I bet none of this will be allowed out."[108] As predicted, the comment was edited out by the BBC prior to broadcasting, but the complete interview was included as a bonus track on a re-release of Public Image Ltd's 1978 debut album Public Image: First Issue in 2013, after Savile's death.[109] In October 2014, Lydon expanded on his original quote, saying: "By killed I meant locking him up and stopping him assaulting young children... I'm disgusted at the media pretending they weren't aware."[110]

Former professional wrestler Adrian Street described in a November 2013 interview how "Savile used to go on and on about the young girls who’d wait in line for him outside his dressing room ... He'd pick the ones he wanted and say to the rest, 'Unlucky, come back again tomorrow night'." Savile, who cultivated a "tough guy" image promoted by his entourage, was hit with real blows during a 1971 bout with Street, who commented that had he "known then the full extent of what I know about [Savile] now, I’d have given him an even bigger hiding – were that physically possible."[111]

In a 1990 interview for The Independent on Sunday, Lynn Barber asked Savile about rumours that he liked "little girls". Savile's reply was that, as he worked in the pop music business, "the young girls in question don't gather round me because of me – it's because I know the people they love, the stars... I am of no interest to them."[112] In April 2000, in a documentary by Louis Theroux, When Louis Met... Jimmy, Savile acknowledged "salacious tabloid people" had raised rumours about whether he was a paedophile, and said, "I know I'm not."[113] A follow-up documentary, Louis Theroux: Savile,[114][115][116][117] about Savile and Theroux's inability to dig more deeply,[118] aired on BBC Two in 2016.[119]

In 2007, Savile was interviewed under caution by police investigating an allegation of indecent assault in the 1970s at the now-closed Duncroft Approved School for Girls near Staines, Surrey, where he was a regular visitor. The Crown Prosecution Service advised there was insufficient evidence to take any further action and no charges were brought.[120] In March 2008, Savile started legal proceedings against The Sun, which had linked him in several articles to child abuse at the Jersey children's home Haut de la Garenne.[121] At first, he denied visiting Haut de la Garenne, but later admitted he had done so following the publication of a photograph showing him at the home surrounded by children.[122] The States of Jersey Police said that in 2008 an allegation of an indecent assault by Savile at the home in the 1970s had been investigated, but there had been insufficient evidence to proceed.[123] In 2009, in a taped interview with his biographer, Savile defended pop star Gary Glitter, convicted in 1999 of possession of child pornography, whom he described as a celebrity being vilified for watching "dodgy films": "It were for his own gratification. Whether it was right or wrong is up to him as a person... they [viewers] didn't do anything wrong but they are then demonised." The interview was not published at the time, and the recording was not released until after Savile's death.[124]

In 2012, Sir Roger Jones, a former BBC governor for Wales and chairman of BBC charity Children in Need, disclosed that more than a decade before Savile's death he had banned Savile from involvement in the charity, because he felt his behaviour was "strange" and "suspicious", and had heard unsubstantiated rumours about his activities.[125] Former Royal Family press secretary Dickie Arbiter said Savile's behaviour had raised "concern and suspicion" when Savile acted as an informal marriage counsellor between Prince Charles and Princess Diana in the late 1980s, although no reports had been made.[89]

After his death
Immediately after Savile's death, the BBC's Newsnight programme began an investigation into reports that he was a sexual abuser. Meirion Jones and Liz MacKean interviewed one victim on camera and others agreed to have their stories told. The interviewees alleged abuse at Duncroft approved school for girls in Staines, Stoke Mandeville Hospital and the BBC. The item was scheduled for broadcast in Newsnight on 7 December 2011, but was never shown; the BBC broadcast tributes to Savile at Christmas 2011. Newsnight also discovered that Surrey Police had investigated allegations of abuse against Savile.[126] In December 2012, a review led by Nick Pollard of the BBC's handling of the issue described the decision not to broadcast the Newsnight investigation as "flawed". The review said that Jones and MacKean had found "cogent evidence" that Savile was an abuser. George Entwistle – at that time the Director of BBC Vision – who had been told about the plan to broadcast the Newsnight item, was described by the review as "unnecessarily cautious, and an opportunity was lost".[127][128]

There was no public mention of the Newsnight investigation into Savile at the time but in early 2012, several newspapers reported that the BBC had investigated but not broadcast (its report of) allegations of sexual abuse immediately after his death. The Oldie alleged there had been a cover-up by the BBC.[129]

On 28 September 2012, almost a year after his death, ITV said it would broadcast a documentary as part of its Exposure series, The Other Side of Jimmy Savile.[12] The documentary, presented by Mark Williams-Thomas, a consultant on the original Newsnight investigation, revealed claims by up to 10 women, including one aged under 14 at the time, that they had been molested or raped by Savile during the 1960s and 1970s.[130] The announcement attracted national attention, and more reports and claims of abuse against him accumulated. The documentary was broadcast on 3 October. The next day, the Metropolitan Police said the Child Abuse Investigation Command would assess the allegations.[131]

By 19 October 2012, police were pursuing 400 lines of inquiry based on testimony from 200 witnesses via 14 police forces across the UK. They described the alleged abuse as "on an unprecedented scale", and the number of potential victims as "staggering".[132] Investigations codenamed Operation Yewtree were opened to identify criminal conduct related to Savile's activities by the Metropolitan Police, and to review the 2009 decision by the Crown Prosecution Service to drop a prosecution as "unlikely to succeed".[16][17] By 25 October, police reported the number of possible victims was approaching 300.[13]

On 12 November 2012, the Metropolitan Police announced the scale of sexual allegations reported against Savile was "unprecedented" in Britain: a total of 450 alleged victims had contacted the police in the ten weeks since the investigation was launched. Officers recorded 199 crimes in 17 police force areas in which Savile was a suspect, among them 31 allegations of rape in seven force areas.[133] Analysis of the report showed 82% of those who came forward to report abuse were female and 80% were children or young people at the time of the incidents.[134] One former Broadmoor nurse claimed that Savile had said that he engaged in necrophiliac acts with corpses in their mortuary in Leeds; Savile was friends with the chief mortician, who gave him near-unrestricted access.[135]

The developing scandal led to inquiries into practices at the BBC and the National Health Service. It was alleged that rumours of Savile's activities had circulated at the BBC in the 1960s and 1970s, but no action had been taken. The Director-General of the BBC, George Entwistle, apologised for what had happened, and on 16 October 2012 appointed former High Court judge Dame Janet Smith to review the culture and practices of the BBC during the time Savile worked there;[136] and Nick Pollard, a former Sky News executive, was appointed to look at why the Newsnight investigation into Savile's activities was dropped shortly before transmission in December 2011.[136]

On 22 October 2012, the BBC programme Panorama broadcast an investigation into Newsnight and found evidence suggesting "senior manager" pressure;[137] on the same day Newsnight editor Peter Rippon "stepped down" with immediate effect.[138][139] The Department of Health appointed former barrister Kate Lampard to chair and oversee its investigations into Savile's activities at Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Leeds General Infirmary, Broadmoor Hospital and other hospitals and facilities in England.[140]

Exposure Update: The Jimmy Savile Investigation was shown on ITV on 21 November 2012.[141] In March 2013 Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary reported that 214 of the complaints that had been made against Savile after his death would have been criminal offences if they had been reported at the time. Sixteen victims reported being raped by Savile when they were under 16 (the age of heterosexual consent in England) and four of those had been under the age of 10. Thirteen others reported serious sexual assaults by Savile, including four who had been under 10 years old. Another ten victims reported being raped by Savile after the age of 16.[142]

During the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse in March 2019, it was reported that Robert Armstrong, the head of the Honours Committee, had resisted attempts by Margaret Thatcher to award Savile a knighthood in the 1980s, due to concerns about his private life. An anonymous letter received by the committee in 1998 said that "reports of a paedophilia nature" could emerge about Savile.[143]

Aftermath
Within a month of the child abuse scandal emerging, many places and organisations named after or connected to Savile were renamed or had his name removed.[144] A memorial plaque on the wall of Savile's former home in Scarborough was removed in early October 2012 after it was defaced with graffiti.[145] A wooden statue of Savile at Scotstoun Leisure Centre in Glasgow was also removed around the same time.[146] Signs on a footpath in Scarborough named "Savile's View" were removed.[147][148] Savile's Hall, the conference centre at the Royal Armouries Museum in Leeds, was renamed New Dock Hall.[149] Two registered charities founded in his name to fight "poverty and sickness and other charitable purposes" announced they were too closely tied to his name to be sustainable and would close and distribute their funds to other charities, so as to avoid harm to beneficiaries from future media attention.[150] On 28 October it was reported that Savile's cottage in Glen Coe had been vandalised with spray-paint and the door damaged.[151][152] The cottage was sold in May 2013.[153][154]

On 9 October 2012, relatives said the headstone of Savile's grave would be removed, destroyed and sent to landfill.[155][156][157] The Savile family expressed their sorrow for the "anguish" of the victims and "respect [for] public opinion".[158] Savile's body is interred in the cemetery in Scarborough, although it has been proposed that it be exhumed and cremated.[159]

Savile's estate, believed to be worth about £4 million, was frozen by its executors, the NatWest bank, in view of the possibility that those alleging that they had been assaulted by Savile could make claims for damages.[160] After "a range of expenses" were charged to the estate, a remainder of about £3.3 million was available to compensate victims, with those victims not having a claim against another entity (such as the BBC or the National Health Service) given priority, and all victims limited to a maximum claim of £60,000 against all entities combined, a compensation scheme approved by the courts.[161][162]

An authorised biography, How's About That Then?, by Alison Bellamy, was published in June 2012. After the claims made against him were published, the author said that, in the light of the allegations, she felt "let down and betrayed" by Savile.[163]

On 26 June 2014, UK Secretary of State for Health Jeremy Hunt delivered a public apology in the House of Commons to the patients of the National Health Service abused by Savile. He confirmed that complaints had been raised before 2012 but were ignored by the bureaucratic system:
Savile was a callous, opportunistic, wicked predator who abused and raped individuals, many of them patients and young people, who expected and had a right to expect to be safe. His actions span five decades – from the 1960s to 2010. ... As a nation at that time we held Savile in our affection as a somewhat eccentric national treasure with a strong commitment to charitable causes. Today's reports show that in reality he was a sickening and prolific sexual abuser who repeatedly exploited the trust of a nation for his own vile purposes.[164]

Richard Harrison, a long-serving psychiatric nurse at Broadmoor Hospital, said in 2012 that Savile had long been regarded by staff as "a man with a severe personality disorder and a liking for children". Another nurse, Bob Allen, agreed with assessments of Savile as a psychopath, and stated: "A lot of the staff said he should be behind bars." Allen also said that he had once reported Savile to his supervisor for apparent improper conduct with a juvenile, but no action was taken.[165]

What the fuck is your problem?

[SF1900]

Agreed. I was personally referencing over two standard deviations above average as "brilliant". The main thing I was trying to convey is that Peterson is a charlatan and dishonest. He claimed to have an IQ over three standard deviations above average when his IQ isn't even two standard deviations above the mean.

Peterson isn't interacting on Getbig. Professionally, Peterson speaks on the record, with authority, to paying audiences on subjects he's very far from an expert on. Ignorant young paying audiences suck up information Peterson is ignorant on.   

Peterson Bible expert:
 "Peterson began his public series of lectures on the bible without bothering to read it first." -Vox Day, "Jordanetics"

Yes, Peterson admitted it.

Peterson Marxism expert
"That he hasn't read any Marxist literature becomes obvious early on...That he hasn't read any Marx is even more obvious...Let's not pass by the fact that Peterson doesn't know when the Communist Manifesto was written. He says ''1880 or 1890, whenever Marx wrote it.'' Marx and Engels published it in 1948: a year that nobody remotely familiar with modern European history is likely to overlook. Marx was, of course, dead by 1883.    -Alexander Douglas, "Review of Jordan Peterson's Stupid Lecture"

Peterson Supreme Court expert
"It's not a good thing when there is general discomfort with the manner in which something as important as the naming of a new Chief Justice is undertaken. It doesn't bode well for the stability and peace of the state(and -perhaps- there is nothing to more important to preserve than that)."
 -Jordan Peterson, "Notes on my Kavanaugh Tweet"

    "The fact that a Canadian was offering unsolicited advice to Americans on the composition of their highest legal institution was bad enough. The fact that he was doing so in ignorance of the actual position involved was incredible, especially when one considers that The Honorable John G. Roberts, Jr. is still the Chief Justice of the United States, as he has been since 2005.
   Despite the fact that the nomination and confirmation hearings had been in the news for weeks, Peterson didn't even realize that Judge Kavanaugh was replacing the empty seat on the Supreme Court vacated by the retired Anthony Kennedy, who had served as an Associate Justice since 1988." -Theodore Beale

Yes, then I 100% agree with you. Peterson is a charlatan in many regards and he should stick to what he knows. I wish he would have stuck to what he knows. 

[joswift]

Agreed. I was personally referencing over two standard deviations above average as "brilliant". The main thing I was trying to convey is that Peterson is a charlatan and dishonest. He claimed to have an IQ over three standard deviations above average when his IQ isn't even two standard deviations above the mean.

Peterson isn't interacting on Getbig. Professionally, Peterson speaks on the record, with authority, to paying audiences on subjects he's very far from an expert on. Ignorant young paying audiences suck up information Peterson is ignorant on.   

Peterson Bible expert:
 "Peterson began his public series of lectures on the bible without bothering to read it first." -Vox Day, "Jordanetics"

Yes, Peterson admitted it.

Peterson Marxism expert
"That he hasn't read any Marxist literature becomes obvious early on...That he hasn't read any Marx is even more obvious...Let's not pass by the fact that Peterson doesn't know when the Communist Manifesto was written. He says ''1880 or 1890, whenever Marx wrote it.'' Marx and Engels published it in 1948: a year that nobody remotely familiar with modern European history is likely to overlook. Marx was, of course, dead by 1883.    -Alexander Douglas, "Review of Jordan Peterson's Stupid Lecture"

Peterson Supreme Court expert
"It's not a good thing when there is general discomfort with the manner in which something as important as the naming of a new Chief Justice is undertaken. It doesn't bode well for the stability and peace of the state(and -perhaps- there is nothing to more important to preserve than that)."
 -Jordan Peterson, "Notes on my Kavanaugh Tweet"

    "The fact that a Canadian was offering unsolicited advice to Americans on the composition of their highest legal institution was bad enough. The fact that he was doing so in ignorance of the actual position involved was incredible, especially when one considers that The Honorable John G. Roberts, Jr. is still the Chief Justice of the United States, as he has been since 2005.
   Despite the fact that the nomination and confirmation hearings had been in the news for weeks, Peterson didn't even realize that Judge Kavanaugh was replacing the empty seat on the Supreme Court vacated by the retired Anthony Kennedy, who had served as an Associate Justice since 1988." -Theodore Beale

I would love you to sit down and debate some topics with him...

[friedchickendinner]

I wonder how much IQ it takes to write about David Icke in a thread about David Icke?