ND, you are a Greek travesty. Despite incontrovertible evidence, you persist in your delusions. If I were a psychiatrist, I would be prescibing Geodon or Haldol to you. Any person without bias can clearly see that Yate's looked like crap after 1994. He may have been hard, but nowhere near the condition of his famous B&W film photos, which a respected member on the board clearly informs that digitized colored photos into B&W are not equal. Moreover, his symmetry was appalling. From the front Nasser destroyed him. If Nasser had a back equal to Levrone's, he would have won. Coleman was largely overlooked until late 1997. That is a fact. If the judges were not biased (hardly the case in the IFBB but stay with me), Ronnie would have won easily. Yates looked like shit. He looked good one year, maybe decent in 1995 but he still had that torn bicep. The other years were a joke. If Haney were around, he would have won. Yates may have taken him in 1993, but who is to say Haney wouldn't have gotten jacked on the gear and come in 10 pounds heavier also. Every statement you make is regurgitated. Your points are asinine. How a respected poster became a sandbox to tout a very average Mr. Olympia after 1993 is beyond me and many others. As far as overlooking an athlete, I can point out our current Branch Warren. Yes he has gotten better, but not so much that he has appeared out of the blue this year. When he first became a pro, many a scribe wondered how this guy placed so low. If you can honestly state that nobody ever got screwed in an IFBB pro show, I got some beach property in Nevada I want to sell you.