we are saying dorian was overrated because he won solely based on physical size not quality.
Quality is where suffered:
-poor quads from the front
-average arms, poor from the back
-poor taper in the symmetry round (see the 92 pic I just posted)
-even his famous back revealed a not-so-great rear double biceps pose
-wide waist
-few striations (except for lower back)
-not very vascular (sorry, but this does add impressiveness to the arms especially)
-poor delt shape
-only average chest
What you have is a Mr. O. who won because:
-he was a whole lot larger than his nearest competitors
-he had great calves
-he had good abs at one time
-he had great lats.
A 6 time Mr. O. should be a whole lot more than that.
When comparing him to Ronnie at his best, Ronnie has the size AND the quality to go with it:
dorian was a Mr. O. with mediocre arms, chest and quads when viewed from the front. Sorry, but pics like this do not lie - if he had super impressive chest, arms and delts, this pose would look a whole lot better.
The most muscular highlights upper body flaws.
Or, if you have them, upper body strengths.
sorry if this is being harsh, but most shots of Dorian do not impress me like you would expect to be impressed by a 6 time Mr. O.
hence, why I believe he was overrated.