At his best 1993/1995 would give Ronnie a run for his money I don't care how big Ronnie was in 2003 , he's still down overall conditioning and balance & proportion , Ronnie may have had a walk in the park with Cutler and Dex , Dorian is another story , I'm more than willing to admit he might lose but it wouldn't be easy for either of them .
ND, the only guy who was close to Ronnie's 2003 size was Nasser and Fux. Fux never quite got the conditioning. Nasser did not know how to hit his back shot. Dillet may have been close to that size, but his chest and back sucked. Ronnie was thirty pounds bigger, in damn good shape, and would have been thicker than Dorian in every bodypart but calves. However, to Dorian's credit he got in sick condtioning. Thus, the show would have been very good. I totally disagree that Dorian would be beaten soundly. Dorian in 1993 is what I consider to be the second most muscular individual presentation to ever walk onto stage. In 1993, his waist was also very tight. Thus, I agree that he was completely spectacular. In 1995, his conditioning may have been a tad better, but he had already lost half of his limbs (upper body). Thus, the weakness would too much to overcome. Besides, Coleman's calves may suck, but at least they are symmetrically lacking
. Regardless, Dorian never beat a guy who was 285 and had the size and density of 2003 Coleman. Then again, that year much have been a freak year for Coleman, because the only year he even came close was 2005. He was still 15 or so pounds lighter, but in similar conditioning.
