Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce (Read 3489126 times)

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #11950 on:** November 05, 2006, 03:33:46 PM »

Quote from: pumpster on November 05, 2006, 03:25:08 PM

Is that why Nassers arms, both bis AND tris appear to be at least 3" bigger than Yates' flapjacks, and are more cut?

Yates doesn't seem to have delts in this comparison to Nasser's cannonballs, either.

How can you have a better backdouble biceps show when you're missing a back? lol Nasser is indeed cvarrying excess water in his back , he lack back thickness , density , detail , development and depth , compares favorably in width , he looked sharper in 1995 thats why he placed third behind Ray in 1996 and he failed the diuretics test so he didn't even place in 1996 officially , you seriously are deluted to think for a moment that Nasser could possibly compare to Yates in the back , Ronnie at his best is probably the only one who could , but when you make these insane statements you showcases you're ignorance of competitive bodybuilding , but thank God you have me here to correct you .

Hulkster · « **Reply #11951 on:** November 05, 2006, 03:34:07 PM »

front lat, 98

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #11952 on:** November 05, 2006, 03:34:50 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on November 05, 2006, 03:30:51 PM

I still think Shawn had by far and above the greatest midsection ever.

best overall abs, intercostals, serratus and tiny waist to boot.

Shawn did have a fantastic midsection !!

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #11953 on:** November 05, 2006, 03:37:38 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on November 05, 2006, 03:34:07 PM

front lat, 98

Looks good for Ronnie but he could never hang with a 257lbs Yates in this pose , hell he barely beat Flex in this pose nevermind the lastpread God , Dorian Yates .

Hulkster · « **Reply #11954 on:** November 05, 2006, 03:38:17 PM »

Ever seen arms this good and a chest this thick as you see here on Ronnie?

unreal.

Dorian would be crushed. sorry, but tis true - now more obvious than ever.

Hulkster · « **Reply #11955 on:** November 05, 2006, 03:40:06 PM »

Ronnie's back, "relaxed"

the more I see of Ronnie 99, the more I truly believe it was the best ever seen overall.

pumpster · « **Reply #11956 on:** November 05, 2006, 03:42:53 PM »

Also obvious that some of these other guys should've been Mr. Olympia over a flawed Yates, starting with Wheeler.

Hulkster · « **Reply #11957 on:** November 05, 2006, 03:43:40 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on November 05, 2006, 03:37:38 PM

Looks good for Ronnie but he could never hang with a 257lbs Yates in this pose , hell he barely beat Flex in this pose nevermind the lastpread God , Dorian Yates .

ahh, but you overlook the details.

notice how Ronnie has good details in his pecs and quads, while Dorian's are smooth.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #11958 on:** November 05, 2006, 03:44:13 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on November 05, 2006, 03:38:17 PM

Ever seen arms this good and a chest this thick as you see here on Ronnie?

unreal.

Dorian would be crushed. sorry, but tis true - now more obvious than ever.

He may crush Flex in this pose but NOT Yates , Ronnie can't even do the pose correctly , his front & side delts obscure his pecs , he doesn't arc his ribcage back and he keeps his legs close together so you can't see his twigs for lowerlegs , Dorian would show him how a textbook sidechest is done.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #11959 on:** November 05, 2006, 03:46:38 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on November 05, 2006, 03:43:40 PM

ahh, but you overlook the details.

notice how Ronnie has good details in his pecs and quads, while Dorian's are smooth.

Yates has pleanty of details and entertaining your theory of more details , you still way behind in density , muscular bulk , muscular balance , hmmmmmmm and lower legs , hey where are his good details in the lower legs lol

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #11960 on:** November 05, 2006, 03:48:11 PM »

Quote from: pumpster on November 05, 2006, 03:42:53 PM

Also obvious that some of these other guys should've been Mr. Olympia over a flawed Yates, starting with Wheeler.

I would have had zero problem with Flex beating Dorian and I expected it to happen in 94 but we all know what happened with Flex , Flex was off and lucky to place ahead of Shawn and his superior shape trumped Shawn's better conditioning .

tomr1976 · « **Reply #11961 on:** November 05, 2006, 03:51:47 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on November 05, 2006, 03:48:11 PM

I would have had zero problem with Flex beating Dorian and I expected it to happen in 94 but we all know what happened with Flex , Flex was off and lucky to place ahead of Shawn and his superior shape trumped Shawn's better conditioning .

You have 8049 posts, and 7054 are on this thread.

Hope this helps.

Debussey · « **Reply #11962 on:** November 05, 2006, 03:52:36 PM »

Quote from: tomr1976 on November 05, 2006, 03:51:47 PM

Nobody replies to my posts. Maybe this will help?

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #11963 on:** November 05, 2006, 03:52:54 PM »

Quote from: tomr1976 on November 05, 2006, 03:51:47 PM

You have 8049 posts, and 7054 are on this thread.

Hope this helps.

And this means what?

haider · « **Reply #11964 on:** November 05, 2006, 04:37:52 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on November 05, 2006, 03:52:54 PM

And this means what?

Exactly what you think it means:

Ronnie > Dorian

Hulkster · « **Reply #11965 on:** November 05, 2006, 04:43:06 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on November 05, 2006, 03:46:38 PM

Yates has pleanty of details and entertaining your theory of more details , you still way behind in density , muscular bulk , muscular balance , hmmmmmmm and lower legs , hey where are his good details in the lower legs lol

after this afternoon's collage of pics, your words have even less meaning.

Hulkster · « **Reply #11966 on:** November 05, 2006, 04:45:50 PM »

shawn, 1994

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #11967 on:** November 05, 2006, 04:46:22 PM »

Quote from: haider on November 05, 2006, 04:37:52 PM

Exactly what you think it means:

Ronnie > Dorian

No he never did

in fact Ronnie had nine cracks at Yates and failed nine times !

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #11968 on:** November 05, 2006, 04:47:02 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on November 05, 2006, 04:43:06 PM

after this afternoon's collage of pics, your words have even less meaning.

Genius these are pics I have posted on this board lol old news Yates Dominates

Hulkster · « **Reply #11969 on:** November 05, 2006, 04:53:54 PM »

check it out!

Hulkster · « **Reply #11970 on:** November 05, 2006, 04:55:38 PM »

this is cool!

thanks to whoever did this cool pics

Hulkster · « **Reply #11971 on:** November 05, 2006, 04:57:01 PM »

and now, finally, a shot from 99!!!

Look at THIS back!!!

Hulkster · « **Reply #11972 on:** November 05, 2006, 04:59:22 PM »

Thanks goes out to Fist302 who posted these pics!!

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #11973 on:** November 05, 2006, 04:59:44 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on November 05, 2006, 04:53:54 PM

check it out!

What year is that side triceps of Ronnie? 03?

haider · « **Reply #11974 on:** November 05, 2006, 04:59:52 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on November 05, 2006, 04:46:22 PM

No he never did in fact Ronnie had nine cracks at Yates and failed nine times !

It can be argued that Ronnie wasnt exactly at his best in the "dorian era". Or that it holds little meaning when a bodybuilder is given the upper hand over another in the IFBB, when comparing physiques. After all, this is the same judging panel that allowed an armless Dorian to win the olympia

I only go by what I see though. My argument above wasnt meant to be an argument in favour of Ronnie; rather it was to discredit your way of comparing the two physiques.

Your eyes apparently tell you a different story- that is something I cannot and will not argue against... Unless you are being dishonest with us... or with yourself.