Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[pumpster]

Game, set & match Haney ownage:

In comparison, Haney looks like he's from Somalia-his skull dominates the muscles:

[pumpster]

Even Yates laughs at these arms & legs. Haney's head continues to dominate. 

[NarcissisticDeity]

see, you know you are losing based on the videos and pics, so you have to try and desperately resort ot a bunch of numbers to try and strengthen your weakening argument.

it isn't working.

eg. check out the lat spread I just posted - the Ronnie that your hero faced looked NOTHING like that.

so saying he beat Ronnie 8 time is meaningless if Ronnie had only 40% of the physique that he would obtain at his peak.

A bunch of numbers ? what like Yates eight Coleman - nil? lol and wow Ronnie was just 40% of his prime opperating conditioning huh? aim just a tad low didn't ya? Ronnie was 99% prime condition when Yates raped him , he was 250lbs in 96/97 thats 100% of peak weight and 98% of peak condition , so boo-hoo , Ronnie isn't as great as I thought he was , Boo-hoo Ronnie couldn't even come close to Dorian when they competed even with an eight year head start , this isn't about lose because they're is nothing to lose , they met , Ronnie lost and here you are , crying because thats all you can do .  


Ronnie 1996 Mr Olympia , he was 250lbs !!  

[pumpster]

Great shot of Coleman ND, keep it up! hahahahhah

[NarcissisticDeity]

Haney was an aesthetic masterpiece and Coleman was an abstract fingerpainting !! Ronnie may have bigger & better parts but his phsyique never had this blend of aesthetics & size and harmony

[NarcissisticDeity]

Great shot of Coleman ND, keep it up! hahahahhah

Thank you !! I'm glad you agree ( seriously ) because Dorian beat this version of Coleman lol 

[Tigerman]

Thank you !! I'm glad you agree ( seriously ) because Dorian beat this version of Coleman lol 

Dorian beat not only Ronnie but also Flex, Kevin, Shawn and Nasser.... and these guys beat Ronnie as well.
Guess what? Improved '98 Ronnie defeated them all! I guess it was quite an improvement!
And guess what? In '98 Dorian would have gone down faster than Bannout in 1984.

[pumpster]

Haney was an aesthetic masterpiece

More silly logic. Aesthetics includes balance, thus Haney was far from a masterpiece.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Dorian beat not only Ronnie but also Flex, Kevin, Shawn and Nasser.... and these guys beat Ronnie as well.
Guess what? Improved '98 Ronnie defeated them all! I guess it was quite an improvement!
And guess what? In '98 Dorian would have gone down faster than Bannout in 1984.

No he wouldn't they would have gave Dorian the Olympia in 98 whether he deserved it or not !! perfect example Ronnie in 00/01/02 and the only think that changed for Ronnie from 97 to 98 was his hardness , he competed in 96/97/98 all at the same weight , his overall hardness improved by 98 namely his once problomatic glutes/hams , the buzz back in 98 was Ronnie won because he had striated glutes & better hams , like Flex said he knew Ronnie would win the muscularity round and he would win the symmetry round but how the hell did Ronnie beat Coleman in the posing round? you ever see Ronnie pose? something he never learned to master , but either way Ronnie just barely beat Flex in 1998 , 3 points and thats it , he was lucky Flex wasn't 100% .

[Hulkster]

Dorian beat not only Ronnie but also Flex, Kevin, Shawn and Nasser.... and these guys beat Ronnie as well.
Guess what? Improved '98 Ronnie defeated them all! I guess it was quite an improvement!
And guess what? In '98 Dorian would have gone down faster than Bannout in 1984.

agreed. Coleman was certainly not 99% of his peak in 1996.

Seriously, I would say more like 75%.

But that last 25% makes all the difference.

[NarcissisticDeity]

More silly logic. Aesthetics includes balance, thus Haney was far from a masterpiece.

See you're a child and therefore I must explain everything to you , Ronnie is in no way shape or form the following , aesthetic , balanced or proportioned , his balance sucks , tiny calves GIANT QUADS small forearms ( in relation ) GIANT TRICEPS & BICEPS , a GIGANTIC ASS which can be seen from the front , nevermind whe he turns around , bad news for you sport Ronnie is a FREAKY COLLECTION OF PARTS and not much more , great size , great condition great collection of parts , that sums up Coleman .

[Tigerman]

No he wouldn't they would have gave Dorian the Olympia in 98 whether he deserved it or not !! perfect example Ronnie in 00/01/02 and the only think that changed for Ronnie from 97 to 98 was his hardness , he competed in 96/97/98 all at the same weight , his overall hardness improved by 98 namely his once problomatic glutes/hams , the buzz back in 98 was Ronnie won because he had striated glutes & better hams , like Flex said he knew Ronnie would win the muscularity round and he would win the symmetry round but how the hell did Ronnie beat Coleman in the posing round? you ever see Ronnie pose? something he never learned to master , but either way Ronnie just barely beat Flex in 1998 , 3 points and thats it , he was lucky Flex wasn't 100% .

ND you would have a point if the posing round was meant to evaluate posing skills or routines. But it's not. Many judges have been asked and they responded that they always evaluate the best body in every round.
So Flex posing ability evidently was not enough to make him look better than Ronnie, in judges' eyes.

That being said in 00 and 02 Ronnie deserved to win even if he was not at his best. You can make an argument for 01 but it was not all that evident.

In 98 Ronnie improved much more than just in the glutes, that wouldn't be enough to make him jump from 9th to 1st.

[Hulkster]

food for thought:

Ronnie 1997:





Ronnie 1998:





Ronnie 1999:




Ronnie 2001:




as you can see, ND's claims that Ronnie 1996/7 was the same as 1999 or 2001 (because the weights were the same) is totally bunk.

You can't go by numbers in bodybuilding.

You have to go by appearence.

Although I have never seen a video of the Arnold Classic, in 1999 at the Olympia, ronnie had striations everywhere, cut quads, and awesome size and fullness, although his back may not have been as detailed as it was in 98, I think the overall look might have been better (his quads were a lot larger in 1999 than in 1998 as well as being more cut)

on second thought, NO, Ronnie probably was only 50% of what he was to become.

the changes in overall look (size, fullness, balance) are astounding.

ronnie looked small and depleted in 1996 and 1997. In 1998 and 1999 he filled out immensely, and looked far better.

[NarcissisticDeity]

agreed. Coleman was certainly not 99% of his peak in 1996.

Seriously, I would say more like 75%.

But that last 25% makes all the difference.

Are you high ? look at this picture !! he is 250lbs & huge , wide and at this point a top tier Pro , the only thing that he was lacking was better conditioning and you think that consitutes 25%? get the hell out of here , he was 249lbs at his first Olympia win , what do you think he did from 97 - 98 ? shed 20lbs of water for a improved hardness? lol and still came in only ONE pound lighter than 1997?  his conditioning did improve from 1997-1998 but do the math .

[NarcissisticDeity]

on second thought, NO, Ronnie probably was only 50% of what he was to become.

the changes in overall look (size, fullness, balance) are astounding.

ronnie looked small and depleted in 1996 and 1997. In 1998 and 1999 he filled out immensely, and looked far better.

Hulkster in those pics you posted where he has the number 7 tag on his trunks doing the front & rear double bicep pose , do you really think thats a far improvement from 1996/1997?

[pumpster]

Ronnie is in no way shape or form the following , aesthetic , balanced or proportioned , his balance sucks , tiny calves GIANT QUADS small forearms ( in relation ) GIANT TRICEPS & BICEPS , a GIGANTIC ASS

blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah..
He looks HORRIBLE..

[NarcissisticDeity]

blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah..
He looks HORRIBLE..

Oh yes aesthetic masterpeice 

[pumpster]

Actually that unmorphed version's not terrible, particularly given that it's not from his last show. Nothing like this abortion..

[NarcissisticDeity]

Yup Lee Labrada , Bob Paris and Ronnie Coleman  247lbs nice gut

[pumpster]

Looked better in '05. Not what he was, but not the attrocity Yates always was. At least with Coleman there's some basis in the fact that he's in his 40s. Yates? 

[NarcissisticDeity]

Looked better in '05. Not what he was, but not the attrocity Yates always was. At least with Coleman there's some basis in the fact that he's in his 40s. Yates? 

Oh yes he looked leaps & bounds better , his gut was no longer a problem 

[Hulkster]

Yup Lee Labrada , Bob Paris and Ronnie Coleman  247lbs nice gut

here is a comparison between Ronnie at 247 and Ronnie at 297.

as you can see, at 247 at the AC, ronnie's midsection was tight (and his waist was tiny)

the man had to breathe you know.

[pumpster]

Again ND stands for nerd. The pic proves his waist looked decent and was better than Jay's, especially factoring in the bodyweight.

[NarcissisticDeity]

here is a comparison between Ronnie at 247 and Ronnie at 297.

as you can see, at 247 at the AC, ronnie's midsection was tight (and his waist was tiny)

the man had to breathe you know.

Most bodybuilders without guts can breath & not have their gut convex 

[NarcissisticDeity]

Again ND the nerd posts a pic that proves his waist looked decent and was better than Jay's, especially factoring in the bodyweight.

They both suck !! and neither are acceptable I don't care what they weigh .