Alright, listen up:
earlier in the thread, you guys were arguing that Flex could beat Ronnie despite having narrow lats and not nearly as much muscle mass....
Now, you are saying that it is impossible for Shawn to beat Dorian because of narrow lats and not as much muscle mass...
YOU CAN'T HAVE IT BOTH WAYS RETARDS!!
what a double standard that applies to Ronnie (vs. Flex) but not to Dorian (vs shawn)
unbelievable.
your own biases caught red handed.
One Flex doesn't have ' narrow lats ' he has an excellent front latspread NOT on par with Yates or Coleman buts its more than adequate you're the one who thinks otherwise and I didn't argue that Flex would beat Ronnie despite not being just as wide or as heavy I'm outright saying
HE DID BEAT RONNIE DESPITE NOT BEING WIDE OR HEAVY why? better conditioning and clearly better shape
Shawn is just to light at his best he weighed 205lbs he was born 10 years to late , his physique would have flourished in the late 1970s early 1980s the last Mr Olympia winner who weighed any where near Shawn was Samir in 1983 at 188lbs he was NEVER going to topple Dorian Yates or Lee Haney he was to small even relatively , Phil Hernon was the same height as Shawn and weighed 240lbs Eddie Robinson was the same height and weighed 230lbs
Flex Wheeler was an exception and why? tiny joints , full round muscle bellies and outstanding shape , he appeared much larger than he was and he could hang with the big boys despite weighing 230lbs , Flex had the ability to beat Dorian and even Yates admitted Flex was the only guy who could give him trouble . Flex is the exception to the rule he could do what Shawn wished to do , where did Flex usually go wrong contest time? his conditioning was hit-or-miss and when it was off he paid the price , Shawn really didn't have that problem but if he was honest with himself he would understanding he was NEVER going to win the Mr Olympia in this day and age and despite that he did very well as a pro especially being so small.
