Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[pumpster]

ND conveniently forgets that Schwarzenegger was 228 lb. in '75, about 10 lb. less than his best-ever in '74. Can make a big difference, when already in great shape.

[Hulkster]

yet more ND owning.

when will he finally admit it?

Ronnie 96 vs. Ronnie 99:

[NarcissisticDeity]

Your figures are wrong. Ronnie was not 255 pounds in 1997.  He was 245 pounds in 1998 and he often talked about how he had been adding 5 pounds of muscle on average every year.

He did not shrink by 10 pounds from 97 to 98.

He ADDED muscle to win his first olympia, not lost it.  this is common knowledge.

secondly, the pics do the explaining quite nicely.

Bull shit I have the magazine coverage from the 1997 Mr Olympia and Ronnie is 255 pounds and not as sharp as he was earlier in the year , so nice try again explain to me how Ronnie can have such a dramatic change and improvment size wise and condition wise by adding two pounds , please explain away Hulkster 

[NarcissisticDeity]

ND conveniently forgets that Schwarzenegger was 228 lb. in '75, about 10 lb. less than  his best-ever look in '74. Can make a big difference, if already in great shape.

He was 235lbs in 75 and 240lbs in 74 

[Bear]

Wow thats a news flash for you? Dorian had a gut in 97? lol you need to pay attention some more and look at Shawn's gut  and Sergio who has NO arms and a belly like a cow.

WTF are you talking about. Arnold at 60 doesn't look so hot either, what's your point?

[NarcissisticDeity]

Ronnie at the 1996 Mr Olympia 250lbs

[pumpster]

He was 235lbs in 75 and 240lbs in 74 

I don't think so, but whatever the number no one thought he looked as good in '75 because there wasn't enough time to get all the size back. Not a huge difference in weight, but a difference in appearance & fullness when already in contest condition.

[Hulkster]

I will now give an example that the newcomer ND will understand, since it deals with his semen supplier, dorian yates:

dorian was 228 pounds in his first NOC contest in 1990

dorian was 235 pounds in his first NOC win in 1991.

the difference was like night and day.

why?

better conditioning combined with a few extra pounds.

[NarcissisticDeity]

I will now give an example that the newcomer ND will understand, since it deals with his semen supplier, dorian yates:

dorian was 228 pounds in his first NOC contest in 1990

dorian was 235 pounds in his first NOC win in 1991.

the difference was like night and day.

why?

better conditioning combined with a few extra pounds.

That means NOTHING about Ronnie please explain how there was a dramatic size improvement from 97 to 99 when he gained just two pounds ? you can't do it , you've painted yourself into a corner and now you're stuck , his improvement came from conditioning.

[Hulkster]

Ronnie in a distance shot from 1997.

Despite ND's bullshit claims, you don't have to be a rocket scientist to see he was not 255 pounds given that we know what he looks like at 257:

[Hulkster]

ps. I just explained the size difference with that pic.

he was NOT 255 pounds in 1997 despite what an erronous listed weight might have said.

no way.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Ronnie 1996 250 pounds and he looked fantastic , he did improve slightly by 98/99 but stop acting like its as dramatic as 2002 to 2003 !

[NarcissisticDeity]

ps. I just explained the size difference with that pic.

he was NOT 255 pounds in 1997 despite what an erronous listed weight might have said.

no way.

LMFAO when proved wrong you always revert to denile , he's 255 pounds in 1997 !

[Hulkster]

ah, but ND I am pretty sure musclemag listed ronnie's weight at 235 at the 96 NOC.

[Bear]

ND you must have no concept of quality over quantity. Who cares what his weights were in 96, 97 he looked plain better in 98,99. Superior conditioning means that less is more sometimes as I thought you would understand. Plus you have to be blind not to be able to see he brought up his delts a whole bunch between 97 and 98.

You can prove he looked great in 97 because it's true but that doesn't mean he didn't look a whole bunch better still in 98!!!

[Hulkster]

ND must be new.

[NarcissisticDeity]

ah, but ND I am pretty sure musclemag listed ronnie's weight at 235 at the 96 NOC.

LMFAO I have the magazine right besides me and he was 235lbs at the 1994 Mr Olympia notice a difference?

[Hulkster]

Ronnie 96 vs Ronnie 99:

[NarcissisticDeity]

ND you must have no concept of quality over quantity. Who cares what his weights were in 96, 97 he looked plain better in 98,99. Superior conditioning means that less is more sometimes as I thought you would understand. Plus you have to be blind not to be able to see he brought up his delts a whole bunch between 97 and 98.

You can prove he looked great in 97 because it's true but that doesn't mean he didn't look a whole bunch better still in 98!!!

Oh no one is denying he looked better in 98/99 but his size advantage was minimal at best this is my whole point , its NOT as dramatic as 2002 to 2003 he did gain some size NOT dramatic where he imrproved leaps & bounds is conditioning.

[NarcissisticDeity]

1996

[NarcissisticDeity]

1996

[NarcissisticDeity]

1996 !!

[pumpster]

ND you must have no concept of quality over quantity. Who cares what his weights were in 96, 97 he looked plain better in 98,99. Superior conditioning means that less is more sometimes as I thought you would understand. Plus you have to be blind not to be able to see he brought up his delts a whole bunch between 97 and 98.

You can prove he looked great in 97 because it's true but that doesn't mean he didn't look a whole bunch better still in 98!!!

Doesn't seem to comprehend what subtle differences can do to appearance, because of the numbers obsession. It's bodybuilding 101, beginner's stuff.

To make it simpler to the cognitively challenged number-crunchers..these guys are close to the same weight..

[NarcissisticDeity]

Doesn't seem to comprehend what subtle differences can do to appearance, because of the numbers obsession. It's bodybuilding 101, beginner's stuff.

To make what is simple simpler to the cognitively challenged..these guys are about the same weight..

No this is where you're missing the point , I understand the improvements Ronnie made in terms of conditioning from 1996/97 to 1998/99 thats not what I'm talking about , I'm talking about size improvements which were minimal at best , not as dramatic as the size difference from 2002 - 2003

[Hulkster]

ronnie 99 vs. Ronnie 96:

ND do you now see what a few pounds can do for appearence?

your beginner's knowledge is astounding.