Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[pobrecito]

why is Ronnie's forarm a foot longer than Yates?? hahahahaha

Secondly, 2003 Ronnie is softer than a soggy pancake compared to Yates. 99 is Coleman's only chance against Yates if you want to discuss a best v. best argument. In any case, Ronnie never matched Dorian's condition or hardness. This is Dorian's trademark. The only thing Coleman will be remember for 10 years from now is the soft, fat size in 2003 and his 2006 disaster. Hopefully 2007 is even worse and ruins his legacy even more

[NeoSeminole]

Oh jesus lol your scaling abilities leave a lot to be desired.

oh jesus lol your mental capacity leaves much to be desired.

[NarcissisticDeity]

why is Ronnie's forarm a foot longer than Yates?? hahahahaha

Secondly, 2003 Ronnie is softer than a soggy pancake compared to Yates. 99 is Coleman's only chance against Yates if you want to discuss a best v. best argument. In any case, Ronnie never matched Dorian's condition or hardness. This is Dorian's trademark. The only thing Coleman will be remember for 10 years from now is the soft, fat size in 2003 and his 2006 disaster. Hopefully 2007 is even worse and ruins his legacy even more

No his forearms are scaled correctly  and Ronnie's arms look like they're 10' bigger than Dorian which is bull Ronnie had really big arms in 2003 but thats absurd ! seriously.

Neo you suck. 

[NarcissisticDeity]

oh jesus lol your mental capacity leaves much to be desired.

Oh please kid you're not operating on my level , maybe pumpsters but not mine.

[Hulkster]

why is Ronnie's forarm a foot longer than Yates?? hahahahaha

Secondly, 2003 Ronnie is softer than a soggy pancake compared to Yates. 99 is Coleman's only chance against Yates if you want to discuss a best v. best argument. In any case, Ronnie never matched Dorian's condition or hardness. This is Dorian's trademark. The only thing Coleman will be remember for 10 years from now is the soft, fat size in 2003 and his 2006 disaster. Hopefully 2007 is even worse and ruins his legacy even more

and yates will always be remembered for this:

[NeoSeminole]

No his forearms are scaled correctly and Ronnie's arms look like they're 10' bigger than Dorian which is bull Ronnie had really big arms in 2003 but thats absurd ! seriously.

Dorian posed with his forearms held closer and rotated forward while Ronnie points his forearms straight up. Ronnie also had much bigger arms. Dorian's were around 20" while Ronnie's were almost 24".

[NarcissisticDeity]

and yates will always be remembered for this:

It could be worse lol

[NarcissisticDeity]

Dorian posed with his forearms held closer and rotated forward while Ronnie points his forearms straight up. Ronnie also had much bigger arms. Dorian's were around 20" while Ronnie's were almost 24".

LMFAO almost 24 and where did you get Dorian's were around 20" WTF are you making this up as you go along?

[NeoSeminole]

It could be worse lol

ha ha ha, you got that right.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Ronnie will always be remembered for blowing the most important Mr Olympia contest in history.

and Jay laughing at Ronnie's back.

[NarcissisticDeity]

ha ha ha, you got that right.

Your best year  this is the worse ANY Mr Olympia winner looked ever

[pobrecito]

and yates will always be remembered for this:

nope. Sorry. Yates will always be remembered for his granite hardness and condition at the 93 and 95 Olympias. Ronnie will always be known for 2003, unfortunately what good is the extra 30lbs when you are in inferior condition? But what people will most remember, as it will be fresh in their minds, is 2006 and 2007 where Ronnie is just going to and already has begun to fall apart. An atrophied lat and tricep is going to severly hinder his training, and next year will just be worse....or he will resort to synthol

[delta9mda]

ronnie will always be remembered as the mr o that lost the o and got beat as mr o....ha-ha!

[pobrecito]

ronnie will always be remembered as the mr o that lost the o and got beat as mr o....ha-ha!

speak on 1995 and Dozzer's dominance

[pobrecito]

fuck off.

We need to hear this first hand account of Dozzer's dominance instead of this bullshit Huckster spews

[Hulkster]

Pubic has been a bitter little bitch ever since the 99 olympia stuff was posted and it became clear to the entire board that Ronnie would beat yates.

ever since then he posts crap that is almost indistinguishable from ND's bullshit.

[Bast000]

[pobrecito]

The only bullshit comes from you Hulkster.

Ronnie will only be remembered for his soggy mass in 2003 and his laughable implosion in 2006 and 2007

[pobrecito]

Your post makes no sense.

Anyways, Dorian had better conditioning than Ronnie at his best, a smaller/non existant gut during posing routine, and a more complete and balanced physique. This is why he would win. Ronnie's 287lbs in 2003 sounds impressive but it's soggy pancake like mass. Dorian was granite hard, especially in 1995.

[pobrecito]

Use....reading...compreh ension....then

Dorian was the hardest ever IMO, but he was structurally flawed and it showed.  He did however outmass everyone and won 6 Sandows because of it.  Ronnie is really only lacking calves, at least until 06 when he went to shit.

Well, in this thread you are usually scolded if you make 1 spelling or grammar error

Your statement is idiotic as well. Dorian did not outmass everyone. Mass was not the reason Dorian won the sandow. It was a combination of mass, detail, and condition. See Dorian had the detail and condition of a 215lb bodybuilder with the perceived mass of a 285lb bodybuilder. That is why he won.

[onlyme]

MAN THAT'S FUNNY!

[pobrecito]

Okay, he did not outmass Nasser and Dillet...he could pose and he had a back, happy?

People underestimate the importance of posing. Dorian was a master poser. It's actually embarrasing to watch Coleman pose. That 2002 Mr. O was a true joke and embarrasment.

Dorian had the best back of all-time, so yes, that's another reason he dominated.

But like I said, Dorian won becuase he had the detail and condition of the smaller guys with the perceived mass of the big guys.

[pumpster]

.

[carvedoutofwood]

6 pack

[pobrecito]

6 pack

What good is size at the expense of your best condition?