Ronnie looks alot drier than Yates.
of course he does.
because he was.
in 98 and 99 Ronnie was dryer in almost all areas, incuding the quads, delts, chest, triceps, biceps, glutes and hams.
he was equal in the upper back.
he was NOT as dry as dorian in the midsection, and the lower back.
thats it.
the whole notion that dorian in 93 was so much dryer than ronnie in 99 is nothing more than words on a post.
it has never ever stood up to the test of reality:
and ND's quotes can't save him, because no one has ever directly made comments comparing ronnie 99 and dorian 93 specifically.