Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[NarcissisticDeity]

even more bizzare is how he ignores Peter McGough's comment that Ronnie has the best back of all-time.

I didn't ignore it at all I addressed and explained in detail why I disagree with it , and in the same magazine that covers the 99 Olympia Peter McGough says Yates back is the best , and you can counter with well what about 2003 Ronnie ? and I can counter with , his back may have been bigger but it wasn't as detailed , dry or as hard as Dorian at his best so my claim still stands that Dorian has the best back ever , and you ignore Ronnie's quote and Samir Bannouts. 

[NarcissisticDeity]

Team Flex

best back - Dorian Yates , now mind you this was a team of people and they all came to the same conclusion

Dorian Yates has the best back

[NeoSeminole]

I didn't ignore it at all I addressed and explained in detail why I disagree with it , and in the same magazine that covers the 99 Olympia Peter McGough says Yates back is the best , and you can counter with well what about 2003 Ronnie ? and I can counter with , his back may have been bigger but it wasn't as detailed , dry or as hard as Dorian at his best so my claim still stands that Dorian has the best back ever , and you ignore Ronnie's quote and Samir Bannouts.

ha ha ha, I'm not the person quoting Peter McGough like the bible. My point is that if you dismiss his comment about Ronnie possessing the best back of all-time, then you acknowledge he's not always correct. I could likewise argue that his quote about Ronnie's conditioning is flawed. You must accept both quotes or neither. You cannot have your cake and eat it too.

[Iceman1981]

His chest hangs way too low and has hardly any depth to it. That is a weakness if ever I saw one.

Yates left bicep (lack of bicep) is too short and small. That is a weakness if I ever saw one.

[Hulkster]

I still can't believe how much of a blind follower ND is..

I mean, here he is, willing to take Peter's opinion on Ronnie's conditioning even though there are what? 20 or so sets of comparisons showing that there was no noticable difference between 99 and 98?

 

[Iceman1981]

Clearly you are owned and your silence speaks volumes 

I've already OWNED you all day yesterday and you couldn't say $hit about it. All you could do was post pics about your hero that was off topic and admire them like he was your man. So I figured I'll take some time off of OWNING your a$$ for a change. Cya later sucker.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Other than Ronnie's, yeah.

Again I'll explain exactly why Dorian has a better back

Starting with the supper back with the traps , Dorian's traps are much thicker and denser , this is clearly evident in the lower traps

teres major & minor - both show equal development & detail in these muscles

Lats - on width at around the same weight in all probability they're equal in terms of width as well as lat sweep , what separates Dorian from Ronnie is detail & development of the lower lats which is a clear advantage for Yates

lower back - erector spinae - Dorian's lower back is again clearly better his erectors are thicker and have unrivaled detail and development

This is exactly why Dorian has a better back than Ronnie he was everything Ronnie does and more !

[Hulkster]

98 vs 99 pics.

showing that one man's word is not always correct:

[Hulkster]

98 and 99

[Iceman1981]

ha ha ha ha ha, you posted a shot of Dorian missing half an arm. I think Ronnie looks amazing there. His pecs, delts, arms and quads look f*cking massive, and his waist looks small.

lol. He had the balls to post this pic and say it was a good double bi, lol. I mean if you're going to post a pic of Yates, double bi, post a good one atleast. Don't make your situation worse than it is. He just OWNED himself and Yates. If Yates seen that comparison shot, he would of bytch slapped your a$$. I'm guessing your "leader" probably thinks so also.

[NarcissisticDeity]

ha ha ha, I'm not the person quoting Peter McGough like the bible. My point is that if you dismiss his comment about Ronnie possessing the best back of all-time, then you acknowledge he's not always correct. I could likewise argue that his quote about Ronnie's conditioning is flawed. You must accept both quotes or neither. You cannot have your cake and eat it too.

You can't tell me I'm bound by everything he says , I don't have to accept either or , thats faulty logic I think for myself and after comparing the two and their backs I came to the conclusion Dorian has a better back and ironically so did team Flex in 1999 even after witnessing Ronnie 98/99

So let me add that Ronnie & Samir said Dorian had the best back , so did team Flex and also Peter McGough said Ronnie wasn't as hard or detailed 2003 as he was in 1998/99 , 2001 ASC so how can he have the best back ever if he's already lacking in two areas Yates dominates in? detail and hardness? so if Peter meant that Ronnie had the best back ever in 1998/99 why did he and Team Flex choose Yates in 99? 

[Iceman1981]

its amazing the 1950's mentality that the dorian side seems to have.

next, they are going to be arguing that muscles are not even judged...

I've tried all day to show them. I even circled it on the pic, but they still "don't" want to see it. What more can we do? Then they say that I don't know what striations are. lol, unbelievable. Coleman has striations in his bicep, tricep and chest in that pose and Yates doesn't. Face the hardcore facts.

[NarcissisticDeity]

I still can't believe how much of a blind follower ND is..

I mean, here he is, willing to take Peter's opinion on Ronnie's conditioning even though there are what? 20 or so sets of comparisons showing that there was no noticable difference between 99 and 98?

 

This is where you lose badly , ONE I never took his word because at that point I didn't know his word on the topic , I just bought Flex magazine and their coverage of the 1999 Mr Olympia and low and behold he confirms what I've been saying for months now ! so its a matter of our opinions coinsiding  and again your picture comparison is garbage he was there and I'll take his word on it before yours and you have to now dismiss his word because it contradicts your claim , which proves that you really know very little when it comes to competitive bodybuilding ! 

[NarcissisticDeity]

98 vs 99 pics.

showing that one man's word is not always correct:

Laughing My Fucking Ass Off !! seriously ! you have reached an all time low lol you've resized the pictures of 1998 to the quality suffers to try and prove me and McGough wrong

LMMFAO

you have gone off the deep end lol

[NarcissisticDeity]

I've already OWNED you all day yesterday and you couldn't say $hit about it. All you could do was post pics about your hero that was off topic and admire them like he was your man. So I figured I'll take some time off of OWNING your a$$ for a change. Cya later sucker.

Kid come back when you carry some weight 

[Iceman1981]

The dumbest thing I ever read is Dorian's conditioning is a myth , Ronnie 99 is drier than Dorian 93 lol , Dorian is the most overrated bodybuilder ever , Ronnie 99 has more detail in his calves than Dorian , Dorian's back 1996 is better than Dorian at 269 pounds , Flex Wheeler should have beat Dorian at the 1993 Mr Olympia lol Lee Labrada has shitty abs and calves , do I need to continue?

Who said that? lol.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Hulkster you're fucking pathetic dude , seriously man I have drove you right off the edge lol your pics and the real pics 

[NarcissisticDeity]

Who said that? lol.

hulkster

[Iceman1981]

Coleman has a shitty four pack because his chest takes up too much room on his front.

Yates has a small left bicep. Let me guess. His forearms are too big? Nice observation. by the way.

[NarcissisticDeity]

The real pic vs Hulksters toyed pics lol

[Hulkster]

ND why are you trying to claim that the "quality" of the 98/99 comparisons somehow makes them invalid?

you can clearly see the SAME detail in BOTH pics whether there is great quality or not.

hence, virtually the same conditioning.

making the comparisons less grainy will NOT make the 98 pics any more detailed, nor will it make the 99 ones any more detailed.

the detail is right there whether the pic is bad or not.

sure, better quality pics will make the RESOLUTION  of the detail better, but it won't uncover any more detail that we could not see before.

for example:

bad quality 99 screencap vs good quality 99 pic:

notice, the detail is the SAME, just more clear in the 99 pic.

[NarcissisticDeity]

I'm so glad I never been reduced to fucking with pictures to try and proved a point lol man Hulkster you're pathetic !

[Hulkster]

ND is very intelligent...for someone who doesn't have a fucking clue what the hell he's talking about!

lol!!!

hey that's my line!

[NarcissisticDeity]

ND why are you trying to claim that the "quality" of the 98/99 comparisons somehow makes them invalid?

you can clearly see the SAME detail in BOTH pics whether there is great quality or not.

hence, virtually the same conditioning.

making the comparisons less grainy will NOT make the 98 pics any more detailed, nor will it make the 99 ones any more detailed.

the detail is right there whether the pic is bad or not.

sure, better quality pics will make the RESOLUTION  of the detail better, but it won't uncover any more detail that we could not see before.

for example:

bad quality 99 screencap vs good quality 99 pic:

notice, the detail is the SAME, just more clear in the 99 pic.

Hulkster you've been caught read handed toying with pictures , you're beyond desperate , admit you've been proven wrong and apologize , and we'll move on to your next claim so I can stop you there as well.

[Hulkster]

I'm so glad I never been reduced to fucking with pictures to try and proved a point lol man Hulkster you're pathetic !

you should try paying attention to pics instead of words.

you might learn something.