Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[NarcissisticDeity]

LOL you guys ignore the 4 billion comparison shots I already posted and then take the very best 98 shot and compare it against the worst 99 shot in existence.

his back was not holding water in 99:


notice: neither were his glutes and hams:

NO if I were you I could post this comparison shot and claim victory , but I used two scanned pictures both from Flex magazine's coverage of the Olympia contests but scanned at the same DPI by me so we have some continuity , I try and make the comparisons as fair and accurate as possible UNLIKE YOU !

[Hulkster]

LOL

holding water in 99?

[IceCold]

can you not see the pics I just posted?

you've probably doctured every pic posted.

no one else posts pics that match yours equally.

very strange. 

you keep posting the still screen pics from ronnie in 99.

on video he doestn look that good. 

who knows what you did to those pics.  i'm sure you played with things to make it seem ronnie was in better condition then he was.

on the actual tape, ronnie's color is not that dark.  strange.

if i could post the tape i have, the espn special that would air 6 months after the Olympia ended, i would and if you know a way i can, please tell.

[NarcissisticDeity]

LOL

holding water in 99?

You're owned you damn know it !

1998

1999

two separate years of Mr Olympia coverage by the same guy , and the same conclusion both years from and eye witness , two accurate and fair picture comparisons both scanned from Flex magazine and the same DPI for accurate continuity , two links to the contests in question , kid you're ass is handed to you on a Silver platter , you're about as owned as one can ever get.


Quote Peter McGough Flex Magazine Jan 2001

RONNIE COLEMAN : ( 264lbs As big as a house , but holding water. In '98 , he was shredded and bone dry at 250 pounds. Last year ( 1999 ) he was 257 pounds but NOT as sharp as '98. This year ( 2000 ) at 264 pounds , he's not as sharp as 99 , which would seem to say that Ronnie is better at a lighter weight .

[Hulkster]

so you are saying these comparisons are not accurate?

 

[Hulkster]

his arms chest quads glutes delts and hams all appear at least as hard in 99 as they did in 98.

in the most musculars, they appear even more so.

the back appears the same.

[NarcissisticDeity]

so you are saying these comparisons are not accurate?

 

All NOT the same quality , my magazine scans are !  kid you know damn well you're fucked on this one.


Quote Peter McGough Flex Magazine Jan 2001

RONNIE COLEMAN : ( 264lbs As big as a house , but holding water. In '98 , he was shredded and bone dry at 250 pounds. Last year ( 1999 ) he was 257 pounds but NOT as sharp as '98. This year ( 2000 ) at 264 pounds , he's not as sharp as 99 , which would seem to say that Ronnie is better at a lighter weight .

[NeoSeminole]

Ronnie Coleman 03 Mr. Olympia prejudging

287 lbs and hardly a gut (for all those who said he couldn't control his midsection).

[Hulkster]

All NOT the same quality

slight differences in quality do not make for huge differences in detail.

in in this case, the detail is the SAME.

so your "quality" argument carries no weight.

its just another pathetic attempt to defend Peter McGough..

[NarcissisticDeity]

Ronnie Coleman 03 Mr. Olympia prejudging

287 lbs and hardly a gut (for all those who said he couldn't control his midsection).

just what Hulkster wants a change of topics lol I got you covered Neo 

2003 Mr Olympia prejudging and free posing

[NarcissisticDeity]

slight differences in quality do not make for huge differences in detail.

in in this case, the detail is the SAME.

so your "quality" argument carries no weight.

its just another pathetic attempt to defend Peter McGough..

I don't have to defend McGough his opinion carries weight , its YOUR monumentally stupid claim that you're right and he is wrong as well as me , can't be defended lol I've posted a more accurate comparison using magazine scans from 1998 and 1999 both from Flex magazine both scanned at the same DPI and resized by me , this is way more accurate than ANYTHING you have come up with and to top it off I posted two quotes , two videos I covered all my bases and you're dead wrong !

[Hulkster]

another shot of Ronnie's back in 99 showing it was just as hard as in 98:

[Hulkster]

ND Peter McGough is a sel professed moron.

he took shots at Ronnie in 2003.

no one else did that.

the man has it out for him, and always has.

If he can say he looks worse in 99 than in 98, he probably will.

If nothing supports this claim, he probably doesn't care.

[NeoSeminole]

just what Hulkster wants a change of topics lol I got you covered Neo

ha ha ha, you're so pathetic. This discussion is about who would win at their respective bests. So why do you post the most unflattering pics of Ronnie you can find? Likewise, I can do the same about Dorian. Trust me. It's not hard to find unflattering pics of Dorian onstage flexing straight on.

[NarcissisticDeity]

ND Peter McGough is a sel professed moron.

he took shots at Ronnie in 2003.

no one else did that.

the man has it out for him, and always has.

If he can say he looks worse in 99 than in 98, he probably will.

If nothing supports this claim, he probably doesn't care.

meltdown continues lol  and what shot did he take in 2003?

[Hulkster]

another shot of Ronnie's back in 99 showing it was just as hard as in 98:

I suppose ND will claim its a bad quality pic and that he was really full of water in 99

[NeoSeminole]

greek ideal anyone?

[NarcissisticDeity]

ha ha ha, you're so pathetic. This discussion is about who would win at their respective bests. So why do you post the most unflattering pics of Ronnie you can find? Likewise, I can do the same about Dorian. Trust me. It's not hard to find unflattering pics of Dorian onstage flexing straight on.

Neo I don't mind debating anyone but you posted

287 lbs and hardly a gut (for all those who said he couldn't control his midsection)

I mean this is another myth you guys keep pushing , I mean get serious they guys gut in 2003 was way out of control in some pics its NOT and others it clearly is , you claimed he had hardly a gut and I proved you wrong its that simple and using your logic why are you posting pics of Ronnie 2003 ? you yourself agreed that 2001 Arnold Classic was his best showing with Peter McGough , 2003 is a far cry from his best ! from now on ONLY post pics of Ronnie at his best like this ' debate ' is supposed to be 

[NarcissisticDeity]

greek ideal anyone?

You know the irony ? I can post 10 times more bad pic of Ronnie and slanted comparisons like you guys but I confront the topic at hand and address the issues and still come out on top , I don't have to go to the lenghts you guys go .

[Hulkster]

You know the irony ? I can post 10 times more bad pic of Ronnie and slanted comparisons like you guys but I confront the topic at hand and address the issues and still come out on top , I don't have to go to the lenghts you guys go .

this coming from someone who isists there is a noticable difference in conditioning from these two contests...

[NarcissisticDeity]

this coming from someone who isists there is a noticable difference in conditioning from these two contests...

Hulkster you're done ! its over . its been over.

[Hulkster]

Hulkster you're done ! its over . its been over.

think again :

[NarcissisticDeity]

think again :

1998

1999

two separate years of Mr Olympia coverage by the same guy , and the same conclusion both years from and eye witness , two accurate and fair picture comparisons both scanned from Flex magazine and the same DPI for accurate continuity , two links to the contests in question , kid you're ass is handed to you on a Silver platter , you're about as owned as one can ever get.


Quote Peter McGough Flex Magazine Jan 2001

RONNIE COLEMAN : ( 264lbs As big as a house , but holding water. In '98 , he was shredded and bone dry at 250 pounds. Last year ( 1999 ) he was 257 pounds but NOT as sharp as '98. This year ( 2000 ) at 264 pounds , he's not as sharp as 99 , which would seem to say that Ronnie is better at a lighter weight .

[RocketSwitch625]

For seven years this made Ronnie Coleman look like a complete ass and it's easy to see why.

[RocketSwitch625]

Ronnie Coleman 03 Mr. Olympia prejudging

287 lbs and hardly a gut (for all those who said he couldn't control his midsection).

I'm still laughing at those minute calves. The lack of calf development ruins everything IMO. At least Yates HAD arms. Coleman has NO calves. It's a well-known fact.