Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[IceCold]

what i've been saying the whole time.

yates is bigger, fuller, denser, dryer and harder.

ronnie has better shape, details, striations, etc.

is one better than the other?

i think its a personal preference. 

[IceCold]

for all of hulkster's bs about dorian:

dorian is much fuller and denser while being in better/equal condition than ronnie. 

yates had bigger, and fuller delts and traps.l

equal amount of striations on his chest.

forearms that dwraf coleman's. as well as comparable arm size. 

for all hulkster's talk about dorian thighs, ronnie's dont look much better. 

[NeoSeminole]

Coleman getting owned in his own shot lol needless to say Ronnie can't compete in terms of balance either and calves , look at the difference in chest thickness & density ! Yates is hard as steel and Coleman looks soft & puffy

you idiot, why did you photoshop the pic of Dorian? Here's the original next to the pic of Dorian you used in the comparison. And you call my comparisons biased?

[haider]

wow so much nonsese. It finally occurs to me why people stop respoding to this volumnous BS   Lets try to pick this apart one by one(cant believe Im wasting my time doing this):

No no Ronnie isn't crushing anyone , not by a long shot ! you like Ronnie shape better it means nothing you're comparing apples & oranges , it terms of conditioning its night & day , Dorian is bone dry & hard as a rock and Ronnie his puffy and soft ( relatively ) vascularity is a straw to grasp at it means zero , being hard and dry is the hallmark of conditioning being vascular doesn't compensate

The flaw in your argument here is that you're giving the nod to dorian based compltely on his "superior conditioning and hardness" even though that's not all that a bodybuilder should be judged on (Captain Obvious). My choice as to who has the beter shape to his muscles is equivalent to you deciding who has the better look- the vascular, fuller ronnie versus the much drier and harder dorian.
      So, really, you have no upperhand in the argument. Now this(above) was my argument that accepted your premise that the shape of one bodybuilders msucles against another's is entirely a matter of personal preference. HOWEVER, the problem is that this is not true. Now I dont know the bodybuilding jargon and all the bullshit u guys spew, but ronnie clearly has the rounder, better shaped muscles in the most muscular shot. It has more aesthetic appeal also. Basically, your argument is losing here whichever angle u chose to attack ronnie from.

no his arms and unbalanced because his forearms aren't in proportion with his massive biceps/triceps , and I mean do we really need to compare the two in the calves department? lol now you listed Ronnie's advantages in this shot let me counter with Dorians

Yes, his forearms look just fine in the most muscular, and look just as good as Dorian's. You're picking at straws here.

better balance & proportion
Hardness & Dryness
Calves

None of Ronnie's ' advantages ' can compensate for his lack of relative conditioning and balance .

Whatever.

[haider]

you idiot, why did you photoshop the pic of Dorian? Here's the original next to the pic of Dorian you used in the comparison. And you call my comparisons biased?

OWNED!

this has to be a second for ND, the first one being the latspread that was stretched to make him look even wider

[IceCold]

you idiot, why did you photoshop the pic of Dorian?

hulkster has done it since page 98.

[RocketSwitch625]

Here is the genuine version of the pic and he is still owning Coleman.

[haider]

Not by a freakin mile.

[NeoSeminole]

hulkster has done it since page 98.

show me one example. I've been following this thread since day 1, and I have never once seen Hulkster photoshop a pic. This should be an easy challenge for you if what you say is true.

[NarcissisticDeity]

you idiot, why did you photoshop the pic of Dorian? Here's the original next to the pic of Dorian you used in the comparison. And you call my comparisons biased?

Before you make bullshit claims you better have PROOF the pic is NOT I repeat NOT Photoshopped that picture is UNTOUCHED with the exception of being resized to fit into the work area so nice try kid but better luck next time .

[IceCold]

show me one example. I've been following this thread since day 1, and I have never once seen Hulkster photoshop a pic. This should be an easy challenge for you if what you say is true.

there is a most muscular shot that hulkster played with.

i think it was from 98.

coleman is wearing dark blue trunks.

i will find and post later, but its around the 700 page mark.

ND or sucky already called him out on it. 

[NarcissisticDeity]

OWNED!

this has to be a second for ND, the first one being the latspread that was stretched to make him look even wider

Again dead wrong I never touched that photo and NEVER once posted it , I dare you to find one page I ever posted that picture , it can't be done , like Neo a tad to quick to jump to conclusions , you should really do your homework before you make claims like that because in the end you look really stupid. 

[haider]

Again dead wrong I never touched that photo and NEVER once posted it , I dare you to find one page I ever posted that picture , it can't be done , like Neo a tad to quick to jump to conclusions , you should really do your homework before you make claims like that because in the end you look really stupid. 

I know, I know, I was joking

[NarcissisticDeity]

there is a most muscular shot that hulkster played with.

i think it was from 98.

coleman is wearing dark blue trunks.

i will find and post later, but its around the 700 page mark.

ND or sucky already called him out on it. 

Hulkster's handy work !!

[NarcissisticDeity]

Here is Neo biased comparison you have balls claiming I photoshopped anything 

[NeoSeminole]

Before you make bullshit claims you better have PROOF the pic is NOT I repeat NOT Photoshopped that picture is UNTOUCHED with the exception of being resized to fit into the work area so nice try kid but better luck next time.

are you f*cking stupid? I just provided proof by putting the original next to the pic of Dorian you used. It's brutally obvious you stretched the pic to make Dorian look bigger. Look at the difference in head size for f*ck sakes.

[NeoSeminole]

Hulkster's handy work!!

where is the photoshop? All I see is that Hulkster magnified the images. That's why they appear pixilated. Put them up against the originals and make them the same size. I bet they will look the same.

[NeoSeminole]

Here is Neo biased comparison you have balls claiming I photoshopped anything

please, by all means, show me how comparing Dorian and Ronnie when they are the same height is equally biased at comparing a photoshoped pic of Dorian to Ronnie.

[IceCold]

magnified means made larger.

[NeoSeminole]

magnified means made larger.

wow, really? No brilliant deduction there Sherlock! There is a big difference between zooming in and physically altering the properties of the pic by stretching it.

[NarcissisticDeity]

are you f*cking stupid? I just provided proof by putting the original next to the pic of Dorian you used. It's brutally obvious you stretched the pic to make Dorian look bigger. Look at the difference in head size for f*ck sakes.

I never stretch the pic I fit the pic into the work area and it stretch it to FIT I didn't purposesly stretch the pic to make Yates look bigger thats nonesense why the fuck would I do that when I posted the original dozens of times? I would use a pic thats never been posted before , so nice try again you claimed I photoshopped the picture thats a lie period ! they give you an area to put pics side-by-side and the pics are WAY bigger than area so you have to fit the pics to size and thats what I did , obviously there is a difference and its NOT accurate but don't be claiming I deliberately tampered with the pic because thats simply not true .

[NarcissisticDeity]

We belive you.

Whatever 

[haider]

magnified means made larger.

the proportions are not altered though. By stretching the picture you do this.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Here are both photos as they sit in the work area the Ronnie doesn't need really any fitting in the area and the Yates one does , so in the process of fitting it it came out bigger than he original was , not intentional like claimed 

[NarcissisticDeity]

Here is the Yates picture fit ONLY to length in the work area , obviously it needs to be sized for width which I haven't done yet