Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce (Read 3482879 times)

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #21200 on:** January 17, 2007, 07:51:59 PM »

More gym shots. Open to see full size.

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #21201 on:** January 17, 2007, 07:58:36 PM »

Look at that back. Coleman's lats are just hanging.

pobrecito · « **Reply #21202 on:** January 17, 2007, 08:02:09 PM »

Ronnie is about 295 here...yet his lats still look small from the front, they don't pop and they don't look full at all. This is the main reason why Yates wins the front lat spread. Moreso than probably any other pose focuses on the bodypart of that particular pose, the front lat and rear lat spreads emphasize the lats overwhelmingly.

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #21203 on:** January 17, 2007, 08:18:33 PM »

Quote from: usmokepole on January 17, 2007, 07:36:17 PM

holy shit ronnie is a fucking mutant in those shots. that is the most muscle any man has carried. his legs look insane, side tri is actually very good.

glad to see you back usmokepole. I was beginning to miss you.

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #21204 on:** January 17, 2007, 09:39:26 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on January 17, 2007, 05:53:57 PM

Whoa Neo is on the ropes lol sure you did you said Danny & Dorian has the same size arms lol I can post this if you like?

You're more than welcome to post it. My initial comment was in reference to your comparison.

I was joking when I said that Dorian's and Danny's arms were the same size. Obviously they were not. Hence, why I later said "realistically speaking." I do believe their arms were very close in size though.

Quote

2001 ASC you claimed he was just as big as he was in the 1999 Mr Olympia and had the conditioning of 1998 I can post this if you like?

I corrected myself later, which you conveniently forgot to mention. Ronnie's thighs were noticeably smaller at the 01 ASC than in 99. However, the rest of him appears the same size. Now factor in his superior conditioning. This explains why he weighed 10-13 lbs less depending on which source you read. You must realize that 10 lbs distributed on a 5' 11" frame is not that much difference. I guarantee that if I added 10 lbs of muscle evenly to your body, your arms, chest, delts, thighs, lats and calves aren't going to all grow 1-2 inches each. You'd be lucky if each muscle grew maybe half an inch.

delta9mda · « **Reply #21205 on:** January 17, 2007, 09:43:49 PM »

Quote from: Iceman1981 on January 17, 2007, 07:27:33 PM

Amazing shots of Coleman. Open to see the full size.

i agree, but as ive said for a long time, image how much better ronnie would look with some calves that match everything else.

delta9mda · « **Reply #21206 on:** January 17, 2007, 09:46:47 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on January 17, 2007, 05:33:01 PM

hey its the truth.

dorian looked great in 93.

but those 95 shots had him looking very flat (depleated) and not as full compared to his 93 form.

and his torn bi is a massive flaw.

93 dorian was great.

but those 95 dorian shots were honestly no more impressive than the 2003 ronnie:

good in some shots but certainly not great compared to his very best..

stfu, he was even better in 95 than 93. i was there in 95(remember?).