Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[Iceman1981]

Dorian doesn't have loose skin , thats wrinkles thats not fat or water , get serious and you have the balls to post a pic of Ronnie 2004 and in the same sentence type he's tighter and more detailed lol insanely stupid post.

Hey nimrod. Read my post again, when you finish those Hooked on Phonics classes. . I was talking about Cutler and Coleman in 2004. First of all, if he has wrinkles, that's his problem. Second, it's loose and hanging. It's clear to see yates has loose skin. I'm not the onlyone who has stated this before. If yates doesn't have loose skin in his lower back in the rear latspread, then I guess most of the pics are lying?

[NarcissisticDeity]

yawn, Ronnie's back is just as wide and thicker than Dorian's. He also has better arms, glutes, and hamstrings. A strong argument can be made for why Ronnie wins the rear lat spread. However, I can also see why someone may feel that Dorian wins. Neither convincingly beats the other in this pose. This is why I call it a tie.

First of all you don't know is Ronnie 2001 has a back ' just as wide ' thats pure speculation and its doubtful too boot , its insanely stupid to say Ronnie 2001 has a thicker back thats just retarded and again gloss over the criteria all you may Dorian still has the clear advantage in terms of muscular bulk , balanced development , and density , conditioning in all probability is a push

Dorian does the pose correctly couple that with his other advantages and a pair of proportionate and world class calves Ronnie would NOT beat Yates in any back pose , Arnold comments on what happens when you flex your calf and nothing happens 

[NarcissisticDeity]

Hey nimrod. Read my post again, when you finish those Hooked on Phonics classes. . I was talking about Cutler and Coleman in 2004. First of all, if he has wrinkles, that's his problem. Second, it's loose and hanging. It's clear to see yates has loose skin. I'm not the onlyone who has stated this before. If yates doesn't have loose skin in his lower back in the rear latspread, then I guess most of the pics are lying?

big difference between wrinkles and loose skin , lose skin implies he's holding fat or water and Yates doesn't hold either FYI 

[NeoSeminole]

No you're dead wrong numbers most certainly mean a LOT and again 13 pounds is a HUGE difference again just look at Ronnie 1998 to 1999 with just a 7 pounds weight advantage , and its your opinion Ronnie was ' bigger ' in 01 VS 1998 he is very , very similar

wrong, numbers don't mean shit if the pics say otherwise. Gunter weighed more than Ronnie in 03, yet Ronnie looked much bigger. You even said yourself that Lou Ferrigno and Paul Dillet couldn't make Dorian look small despite outweighing him by over 30 lbs. Now you suddenly claim that a 13 lbs difference between 95 Dorian and 01 ASC Ronnie is a lot. Give me a f*cking break! You sound like a hypocrite. You also forget that Ronnie has the advantage of having a narrower waist and smaller joints, which make him appear much bigger than he really is. So you're saying that a blocky Dorian wouldn't get dwarfed by guys who outweighed him by over 30 lbs yet a more aesthetic Ronnie would look small next to him despite weighing only 13 lbs less.

[NeoSeminole]

Hey nimrod. Read my post again, when you finish those Hooked on Phonics classes. I was talking about Cutler and Coleman in 2004.

ha ha ha ha, I've already called ND out several times on his poor reading comprehension. He misinterprets almost every one of my posts. I swear that boy must have failed elementary English a few times.

[NarcissisticDeity]

wrong, numbers don't mean shit if the pics say otherwise. Gunter weighed more than Ronnie in 03, yet Ronnie looked much bigger. You even said yourself that Lou Ferrigno and Paul Dillet couldn't make Dorian look small despite outweighing him by over 30 lbs. Now you suddenly claim that a 13 lbs difference between 95 Dorian and 01 ASC Ronnie is a lot. Give me a f*cking break! You sound like a hypocrite. You also forget that Ronnie has the advantage of having a narrower waist and smaller joints, which make him appear much bigger than he really is. So you're saying that a blocky Dorian wouldn't get dwarfed by guys who outweighed him by over 30 lbs yet a more aesthetic Ronnie would look small next to him despite weighing only 13 lbs less.

Nonsense numbers do mean shit and Gunther weighed more than Ronnie in 03 but Ronnie looked much bigger , genius Ronnie is noticeably shorter than Gunther lol Duh and I didn't Lou & Paul couldn't make Yates look small a IFBB judge did , you know someone who knows a hell of a lot more than you about the criteria  and he didn't get dwarfed by either of them because when you're super-sharp you appear super-big

And again 13 pounds is a big difference , see Dorian 1992 - 1993 , See Ronnie Coleman 1998 - 1999 with just a SEVEN pound advantage BIG DIFFERENCE reguardless if you disagree or not its obvious and yes I am saying a 260 pound Dorian in super-sharp shape would make a 247 pound Ronnie in super-sharp shape look small , you're damn right I'm saying that , Ronnie looks big in 01 , Dorian IS BIG and looks BIGGER in 1995

[NarcissisticDeity]

ha ha ha ha, I've already called ND out several times on his poor reading comprehension. He misinterprets almost every one of my posts. I swear that boy must have failed elementary English a few times.

No it just shows how much I pay attention to your posts  and I've always scored very high on reading comprehensions tests

[IceCold]

What are you talking about. Coleman's back is thicker, tighter and more detailed. Rear delts are better and arms are bigger, hams and glutes are better. Hell, even Coleman's calves look good in this shot compared to Cutler. Look how smooth Cutler's back is, no detail. Plus, Cutler has loose skin in his lower back like yates in this pose. Cutler has Smooth hams and glutes. I don't see how Cutleer looks better than Coleman.

Both pics of yates you posted, he still has loose skin in his lower back.

my mistake.

i thought cutler was better than that.

he is better on the video (compared to the pictures), but not by much. 

width is the only thing is comparable with coleman. 

[pobrecito]

yawn, Ronnie's back is just as wide and thicker than Dorian's. He also has better arms, glutes, and hamstrings. A strong argument can be made for why Ronnie wins the rear lat spread. However, I can also see why someone may feel that Dorian wins. Neither convincingly beats the other in this pose. This is why I call it a tie.

God-damn....Ronnie rear lat blows there compared to Yates...soft as shit

[RocketSwitch625]

PWN3D

[RocketSwitch625]

[pobrecito]

hahahahahahahahah the Daddy strikes again hahahahahaha

[Necrosis]

  Thanks for proving my point!

SUCKMYMUSCLE

dude your dead wrong i wont even entertain your reply with another argument.

all i would like to know is the definition of taper your using. please post it.  taper means what it implys your making up your own defintion and the picture proved you wrong. please post pics, definitions, or anything to support your argument that only delts and waist create taper.

ill respond when your argument actually has some substance. a pic, a definition, an example even. not your own made up definition.

[Iceman1981]

PWN3D

That's an OWNED?

[RocketSwitch625]

That's an OWNED?

Well you said he had the best glutes. All I see is a giant butterfly stuck to his lower back. 'Nuff said.

[Hulkster]

the top 3 in the Mr. Loose Skin and Wrinkled Olympia:

hahahaha

It would be game over for Dorian against Ronnie's rear lat. Loose skin and fat is the kiss of death in that pose...

[IceCold]

the top 3 in the Mr. Loose Skin and Wrinkled Olympia:

hahahaha

It would be game over for Dorian against Ronnie's rear lat. Loose skin and fat is the kiss of death in that pose...

yates back looked best in 95.  actually, 93 may be the worst his back looked.

you do know that you posted a picture of cutler from 06 when he beat ronnie 4 times in a row. 

[NarcissisticDeity]

the top 3 in the Mr. Loose Skin and Wrinkled Olympia:

hahahaha

It would be game over for Dorian against Ronnie's rear lat. Loose skin and fat is the kiss of death in that pose...

Where is the lose skin?  if Dorian had loose skin or any fat or water it would be clearly visible in this shot which by the way is from the same contest as the one you posted , this post is among your dumbest another meltdown-induced grasping at straws angle

[pobrecito]

Nobody, I mean nobody had thicker lats than the Diesel...not even the 305lb Ronnie

[NarcissisticDeity]

Nobody, I mean nobody had thicker lats than the Diesel...not even the 305lb Ronnie

No , no you're wrong a 247 pound Ronnie had thicker lats lol

[pobrecito]

That is a horrible shot of Ronnie.....hopefully he didn't truly look that bad at the 01ASC

[NarcissisticDeity]

That is a horrible shot of Ronnie.....hopefully he didn't truly look that bad at the 01ASC

Playing the devils advocate ' pics don't lie ' according to Camp-Delusional he's probably in the process of fully flexing his lats but I like to bust their asses by giving them a taste of their own medicene

[IceCold]

That is a horrible shot of Ronnie.....hopefully he didn't truly look that bad at the 01ASC

he did, but it doesnt matter when your competition is dennis james and chris cormier vs. an all time best nasser, dillet, shawn, flex, and kevin.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Look at the thickness of Dorian's lats , traps and teres & infraspinatus in 1995 you'd have to be high to think Ronnie at 247 pounds has lats thicker than this

[pobrecito]

no no ND....his back is flat