Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce  (Read 3520925 times)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83637
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24950 on: February 23, 2007, 04:24:00 PM »
LOL

I've lost it? lol I'm not posting blatantly obvious comparisons and claiming Dorian would crush Ronnie 1992 lol you're very desperate and you've constantly proven yourself incapable of an accurate and fair comparison because you know Dorian has more advantages  ;) keep playing yourself by posting 1994 pictures and 1996 , you admit you're deathly afraid of Dorian at his best for a reason  ;)

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24951 on: February 23, 2007, 04:25:40 PM »
I've lost it? lol I'm not posting blatantly obvious comparisons and claiming Dorian would crush Ronnie 1992 lol you're very desperate and you've constantly proven yourself incapable of an accurate and fair comparison because you know Dorian has more advantages  ;) keep playing yourself by posting 1994 pictures and 1996 , you admit you're deathly afraid of Dorian at his best for a reason  ;)

but dorian was 'bone dry' in 1994 and looked "just as ripped as the other years"

 ::)
Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24952 on: February 23, 2007, 04:27:31 PM »
 ;)
Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83637
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24953 on: February 23, 2007, 04:28:13 PM »
but dorian was 'bone dry' in 1994 and looked "just as ripped as the other years"

 ::)

Was it his best? NO not quite keep on posting away kid you play yourself for the biased , ignorant person you are with each post , you fear Dorian at his best for a very good reason   ;)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83637
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24954 on: February 23, 2007, 04:34:55 PM »
what does quality have to do with anything in that pic? ::)

if the pic was crystal clear, do you think he would look 40 pounds lighter? ::)

the point of the pic was very simple, and you still could not grasp it:

here is is again:

bodybuilders who are "bone dry" as you claim (in 1994) do NOT look like THIS:



what does quality have to do with anything in that pic? ::)


Among your dumbest posts ever ! severely stupid lol

forcedreps

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 107
  • Team Garfield
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24955 on: February 23, 2007, 04:39:40 PM »
Was it his best? NO not 

Yeah I agree, not his best but here is he at his best ;)


forcedreps

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 107
  • Team Garfield
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24956 on: February 23, 2007, 04:40:45 PM »
More ;)

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24957 on: February 23, 2007, 04:45:23 PM »
ND claims Dorian doesn't have any loose skin on his lower back. ::)


NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83637
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24958 on: February 23, 2007, 04:49:19 PM »
ND claims Dorian doesn't have any loose skin on his lower back. ::)



Yeah I supposed those lines on  his triceps are loose skin as well  ::) kid learn before you type

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83637
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24959 on: February 23, 2007, 04:50:46 PM »
Yeah no striations from the front , no separation lol

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83637
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24960 on: February 23, 2007, 04:52:25 PM »
Nos striations or separations  ::)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83637
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24961 on: February 23, 2007, 04:54:15 PM »
Ronnie's lacking compared to this

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24962 on: February 23, 2007, 04:57:01 PM »
Ronnie's lacking compared to this

flat as a pancake. His lower back even looks missing. :-\

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83637
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24963 on: February 23, 2007, 04:59:49 PM »
flat as a pancake. His lower back even looks missing. :-\

Wow it looks flat that must mean it is  ::) show me the criteria where it says flat looking backs are to be frowned upon lol keep grasping at straws you need every angle you can get real or not  ;)

Miss Demeanor

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 416
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24964 on: February 23, 2007, 05:05:35 PM »
twigs on a barrel.



With all respect hon, those don't look like twigs.  They certainly don't top Ronnie's arms, though.

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9911
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24965 on: February 23, 2007, 05:07:35 PM »
Wow it looks flat that must mean it is  ::) show me the criteria where it says flat looking backs are to be frowned upon lol keep grasping at straws you need every angle you can get real or not  ;)

its called size, flat, non thick muscle is frowned upon hope this helps.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83637
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24966 on: February 23, 2007, 05:11:56 PM »
its called size, flat, non thick muscle is frowned upon hope this helps.

Size anyone ?  ;) Dorian wrote the book on back thickness , density and detail and dryness and its yet to be surpassed even by Coleman

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83637
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24967 on: February 23, 2007, 05:12:29 PM »
With all respect hon, those don't look like twigs.  They certainly don't top Ronnie's arms, though.

Great post !

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24968 on: February 23, 2007, 05:36:29 PM »
With all respect hon, those don't look like twigs.  They certainly don't top Ronnie's arms, though.

Dorian's arms aren't twigs, per se, but they look small in relation to his blocky torso. That's the point I was making. A lot of people criticize Ronnie for his weak calves, but I'm willing to bet they are bigger than 95% of the members' calves on getbig.

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24969 on: February 23, 2007, 05:36:33 PM »
show me the criteria where it says flat looking backs are to be frowned upon lol keep grasping at straws you need every angle you can get real or not  ;)

the fact that you would even state something like this shows that although you can read the criteria as they are written, you truly have no understanding of what they actually mean in practice... :-\

your reading comprehension skills have been criticized before, and its not hard to understand why...

so, lets see, so far the list of things that are "meaningless" in bodybuilding competition just got longer.

it now includes, (according to the dorian side):

-taper
-vascularity
-striations
-arms
-flatness

 ::)

like I said, what will be next?

muscles?

 ::)

you truly have no idea how bodybuilding is actually judged do you?

note: not how it is written on paper, but how it is actually judged in practice. There is a crucial distinction that you are totally missing.

dorian would lose, for many many reasons all compounded to amount to defeat.

Flower Boy Ran Away

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24970 on: February 23, 2007, 05:38:13 PM »
Size anyone ?  Dorian wrote the book on back thickness , density and detail and dryness and its yet to be surpassed even by Coleman

yawn, how typical of you. Someone says Dorian's back looks flat in the rear double biceps and you post every shot but a rear double biceps. ::)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83637
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24971 on: February 23, 2007, 05:40:47 PM »
the fact that you would even state something like this shows that although you can read the criteria as they are written, you truly have no understanding of what they actually mean in pracise... :-\

your reading comprehension skills have been criticized before, and its not hard to understand why...

so, lets see, so far the list of things that are "meaningless" in bodybuilding competition just got longer.

it now includes, (according to the dorian side):

-taper
-vascularity
-striations
-arms
-flatness

 ::)

like I said, what will be next?

muscles?

 ::)

you truly have no idea how bodybuilding is actually judged do you?

note: not how it is written on paper, but how it is actually judged in practise. There is a crucial distinction that you are totally missing.

dorian would lose, for many many reasons all compounded to amount to defeat.



LMFAO monster delusion , you never knew the criteria until I posted it and again you add what you think the judges look for and think its so , learn before you type

Dorian Yates' back is the textbook definition of the word thick, dense and dry , he's the yard stick in which a outstanding back is measured by

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24972 on: February 23, 2007, 05:41:38 PM »
what does quality have to do with anything in that pic? ::)


Among your dumbest posts ever ! severely stupid lol

you didn't answer the question you fool.

dorian looks 400 pounds in that pic.

I ask again:

would a clear pic make him look ANY better? ::)
Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83637
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24973 on: February 23, 2007, 05:42:11 PM »
yawn, how typical of you. Someone says Dorian's back looks flat in the rear double biceps and you post every shot but a rear double biceps. ::)

No people are claiming his back was FLAT not appeared flat and his back can't be both flat and insanely thick at the same time , no Dorian's back textbook thickness

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24974 on: February 23, 2007, 05:42:25 PM »
the fact that you would even state something like this shows that although you can read the criteria as they are written, you truly have no understanding of what they actually mean in practice...

not only that, but fullness is included in the judging criteria under muscular bulk.