Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce (Read 3521799 times)

IceCold · « **Reply #26525 on:** March 16, 2007, 06:57:37 AM »

Quote from: Hulkster on March 15, 2007, 01:54:03 PM

you have obviously never watched the VHS or the DVD have you?

we've been through this.

i have 2 copies of the vhs and 1 dvd.

those pics match nothing.

you've been proven wrong before, should we prove you wrong again?

Dballn247 · « **Reply #26526 on:** March 16, 2007, 03:42:21 PM »

For Ronnie to be better than Dorian, would'nt he have had to have beaten him onstage. Ronnie has more O titles, but Dorian no longer competed.

Monster living life in the rear view mirror.

Hulkster should be more concerned with whether Ronnie will be able to beat Jay. I doubt it. Ronnie's starting to break down like Yates did. Plus he is no where as marketable as Jay. Jay will repeat this year, even if Ronnie is in better shape. The judges, MC's and fans have had enough of the Victory Collapse and Thank You Jesus speach.

Should be more like a thankyou Victor Conte speach.

IceCold · « **Reply #26527 on:** March 16, 2007, 04:06:46 PM »

Quote from: Dballn247 on March 16, 2007, 03:42:21 PM

For Ronnie to be better than Dorian, would'nt he have had to have beaten him onstage. Ronnie has more O titles, but Dorian no longer competed.

Monster living life in the rear view mirror.

Hulkster should be more concerned with whether Ronnie will be able to beat Jay. I doubt it. Ronnie's starting to break down like Yates did. Plus he is no where as marketable as Jay. Jay will repeat this year, even if Ronnie is in better shape. The judges, MC's and fans have had enough of the Victory Collapse and Thank You Jesus speach.

Should be more like a thankyou Victor Conte speach.

the racist remarks dont help either.

coleman is done.

no amount of chad's plasma expanders will help him.

pobrecito · « **Reply #26528 on:** March 16, 2007, 07:35:42 PM »

Something on this comparison is off....typical ironage comparison....why is arnold's head like a watermelon and Ronnie's like a coconut

Sorry, but Ronnie would dwarf arnold.

Sjipes · « **Reply #26529 on:** March 17, 2007, 10:28:50 AM »

No no no, my comparison needs a little work, but at least it's a fair comparison, which doesnt seem to be the case for the ironage.us photo. Even the infamous hulkster would approve of this I bet!

pumpster · « **Reply #26530 on:** March 17, 2007, 10:40:11 AM »

Quote from: Sjipes on March 17, 2007, 10:28:50 AM

No no no, my comparison needs a little work, but at least it's a fair comparison, which doesnt seem to be the case for the ironage.us photo. Even the infamous hulkster would approve of this I bet!

Doesn't help that parts of Arnold's arms were edited out. $:-\$

Hulkster · « **Reply #26531 on:** March 17, 2007, 10:41:28 AM »

its a good comparison - it shows what we already know: ronnie's arms are much better than Arnold's. Arnold's are in desperate need of some triceps to contend with Ronnie's. And his delts lag far behind too.

Hulkster · « **Reply #26532 on:** March 17, 2007, 10:44:50 AM »

Quote from: pumpster on March 17, 2007, 10:40:11 AM

Doesn't help that parts of Arnold's arms were edited out. $:-\$

no they aren't.

he needs some tris:

and thighs

Sjipes · « **Reply #26533 on:** March 17, 2007, 10:45:20 AM »

Quote from: pumpster on March 17, 2007, 10:40:11 AM

Doesn't help that parts of Arnold's arms were edited out. $:-\$

What do you mean !?

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #26534 on:** March 17, 2007, 11:03:44 AM »

Quote from: pumpster on March 17, 2007, 10:40:11 AM

Doesn't help that parts of Arnold's arms were edited out. $:-\$

I'm not sure if anything was edited out or not, but here is another pic of Arnold.

Hulkster · « **Reply #26535 on:** March 17, 2007, 11:05:46 AM »

nope, nothing edited out.

he just needs tris.

his arms look the same in a mm as ruhl's and gunter's do: all bis , no tris.

Hulkster · « **Reply #26536 on:** March 17, 2007, 05:05:20 PM »

Here is a great comparison between a classic bodybuilder type physique and a classic truck-driver-who-does-construction-work-on-the-side type physique:

pobrecito · « **Reply #26537 on:** March 17, 2007, 05:29:19 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on March 17, 2007, 05:05:20 PM

Here is a great comparison between a classic bodybuilder type physique and a classic truck-driver-who-does-construction-work-on-the-side type physique:

Maybe you should note that less than a week after the video was taped (which you got that top screencap from), that same Coleman was ass-raped by an all time worst Yates at the Olympia LOL.

That screencap right there represents 9th place at the O

pobrecito · « **Reply #26538 on:** March 17, 2007, 05:34:41 PM »

This is no different than the 98 or 99 Coleman, yet he never even came close to Yates LOL

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #26539 on:** March 17, 2007, 05:41:23 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on March 17, 2007, 05:05:20 PM

Here is a great comparison between a classic bodybuilder type physique and a classic truck-driver-who-does-construction-work-on-the-side type physique:

You're 100% right. A classic bodybuilder type physique with a giant ass that sticks out a mile.

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #26540 on:** March 17, 2007, 05:51:09 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on March 17, 2007, 05:29:19 PM

Maybe you should note that less than a week after the video was taped (which you got that top screencap from), that same Coleman was ass-raped by an all time worst Yates at the Olympia LOL.

if anything, that just goes to show the judges don't always follow the criteria.

Hulkster · « **Reply #26541 on:** March 17, 2007, 05:55:20 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on March 17, 2007, 05:34:41 PM

This is no different than the 98 or 99 Coleman, yet he never even came close to Yates LOL

no, no different at all..

99 ronnie makes 97 ronnie look like a balloon in terms of conditioning:

Hulkster · « **Reply #26542 on:** March 17, 2007, 05:56:10 PM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on March 17, 2007, 05:51:09 PM

if anything, that just goes to show the judges don't always follow the criteria.

they sure don't... $:-\$

pobrecito · « **Reply #26543 on:** March 17, 2007, 05:57:46 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on March 17, 2007, 05:55:20 PM

no, no different at all..

99 ronnie makes 97 ronnie look like a balloon in terms of conditioning:

Looks the exact same to me except 96 has more oil and harsher lighting (i.e. making 99 look better).

Sorry, but there is hardly enough of a difference there to justify the 6 position difference between Yates and Coleman

Hulkster · « **Reply #26544 on:** March 17, 2007, 06:38:10 PM »

Quote from: Matt C on March 17, 2007, 06:24:06 PM

How can you say that isn't close to Yates? I would give the overall to Ronnie, but I would never say Yates was "not even close". They are both world class bodybuilders. But an uninjured Coleman is simply too big to be beaten in my opinion.

you can't argue logic with someone who argues repeatedly that 99 Ronnie is the greatest ever and would win 'everything except the ab shot and side tri" to trashing every single aspect about Ronnie's peak physique..

pobrecito · « **Reply #26545 on:** March 17, 2007, 06:44:31 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on March 17, 2007, 06:38:10 PM

you can't argue logic with someone who argues repeatedly that 99 Ronnie is the greatest ever and would win 'everything except the ab shot and side tri" to trashing every single aspect about Ronnie's peak physique..

I've never trashed Ronnie's physique, I admire him a lot as a bodybuilder, I enjoy his videos, his training, etc.

The 99 screencaps were very influential at the time and I made an error in judgement.

Since that time, ND has posted many Yates shots that just blew my mind even moreso than the 99 screencaps.

People go back and revise their opinions on matters all the time on many subjects, why am I not allowed to do the same?

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #26546 on:** March 17, 2007, 06:50:11 PM »

here's what I find funny... ND and Co. argue that Dorian would make 01 ASC Ronnie look small, yet Ronnie looks comparable in size to 93 Dorian due to better structure and muscle shape. 95 Dorian was only 3 lbs heavier than his 93 form, but they claim he would dwarf Ronnie.

pobrecito · « **Reply #26547 on:** March 17, 2007, 06:53:11 PM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on March 17, 2007, 06:50:11 PM

here's what I find funny... ND and Co. argue that Dorian would make 01 ASC Ronnie look small, yet Ronnie looks comparable in size to 93 Dorian due to better structure and muscle shape. 95 Dorian was only 3 lbs heavier than his 93 form, but they claim he would dwarf Ronnie.

Let me ask you a question.

Was there a noticeable size difference in Coleman from 98 to 99 (248 to 257)?

Hulkster · « **Reply #26548 on:** March 17, 2007, 06:57:38 PM »

Quote

People go back and revise their opinions on matters all the time on many subjects, why am I not allowed to do the same?

because to do that sort of a 180 degree turn around is not a revision of opinion.

it is called trolling.

there was a damn good REASON that the 99 screencaps were so influential:

they show a better bodybuiding physique overall than Dorian ever presented.

pobrecito · « **Reply #26549 on:** March 17, 2007, 07:00:38 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on March 17, 2007, 06:57:38 PM

because to do that sort of a 180 degree turn around is not a revision of opinion.

it is called trolling.

there was a damn good REASON that the 99 screencaps were so influential:

they show a better bodybuiding physique overall than Dorian ever presented.

Bullshit.

The single picture of Yates back from 95 blows away any version of Coleman's back.

No bodybuilder has ever been this shredded, dry, dense, and separated from the rear.