Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[IceCold]

why do you keep comparing yates and branch?

what is the point?

[Hulkster]

Guys with a great structure don't need 260 + lbs to look wide, they look wide cause of their better bone structure.

here is a lesson for ForcedReps:

this is an  example of great structure:

[Hulkster]

this is not:

[pumpster]

why do you keep comparing yates and branch?

what is the point?

Both "grainy" bricklayers that some pasty white guys here relate to.

[pobrecito]

Typical Hulkster....oh well...any one with half a brain can detect his bullshit from half a mile away.

Back on topic: Coleman at his best being destroyed...

[pumpster]

Back on topic: Coleman at his best being destroyed...

Um, does it matter that the pic doesn't show that at all..

[Hulkster]

yes, what a great comparison pic, where Ronnie's wasp waist is the same size as dorian's keg..

[pumpster]

Yates' 17" cannons looking ridiculous attached to a keg:

[Hulkster]

we can clearly see here that Ronnie's back has a better structure than dorian's, mainly due to the far superior taper:

not to mention that Ronnie's back is so much thicker. Makes dorian's look like the now proverbial pancake.

[pobrecito]

Coleman's front double biceps never looked this good....not with those nasty alien abs, distended gut, silver dollar tit, and non-existant, oil filled calves..

[pumpster]

As far as width or taper, Yates is not in the same sentence..here they are, with no scaling or other games needed to see it..

[forcedreps]

we can clearly see here that Ronnie's back has a better structure than dorian's, mainly due to the far superior taper:

You fail to understand that structure has nothing to do with muscle bulk, even with 340 lbs he would still have his small bone structure like in 1994.

The only thing that he has improved since 1994 was a shitload of muscle mass but you cannot improve a small structure like he has.

On this pic you only see his muscle bulk, here you can see his structure with way less mass, nothing special if you ask me and that's also one of the reasons why he looks narrow even at the 99 pics if he stand relaxed.

[pobrecito]

As far as width or taper, Yates is not in the same sentence..here they are, with no scaling or other games needed to see it..

Like white on rice...LOL


the defacto comparison of Yates and Coleman clearly showing Yates annihilating Coleman in width, thickness, detail, and taper hahahahahaha

[Hulkster]

You fail to understand that structure has nothing to do with muscle bulk, even with 340 lbs he would still have his small bone structure like in 1994.

The only thing that he has improved since 1994 was a shitload of muscle mass but you cannot improve a small structure like he has.

On this pic you only see his muscle bulk, here you can see his structure with way less mass, nothing special if you ask me and that's also one of the reasons why he looks narrow even at the 99 pics if he stand relaxed.

dorian was no different genius:

 

[pumpster]

Like white on rice...LOL


the defacto comparison of Yates and Coleman clearly showing Yates annihilating Coleman in width, thickness, detail, and taper hahahahahaha

Back to reality without Coleman on an angle, crushing Yates.

[pumpster]

Since Coleman's clearly on an angle here, the only thing certain is that Yates still has no biceps

[pobrecito]

Pumpster can't handle the truth....only explanation for repetitive posting of a blurry screenshot LOL..

sad part is, Yates is still wider in that shot hahahaha

[Hulkster]

ronnie showing his far superior stucture for bodybuilding.

Dorian has a better structure for bricklaying, truck driving, powerlifting and generalized construction work.

[forcedreps]

Back to reality without Coleman on an angle, crushing Yates.

You really think because coleman looks wider in this pic without hitting a pose does automatically mean that he has the wider lats than yates ?   

You are so wrong my little bowflex friend LOL and I have the proof for my claim so here you go sit back and enjoy while you can.

Pics from the 2006 Holland GP.

Just check colemans lat width in the first pic and then check again if he hits the pose.

Your comparison (yates vs coleman 1996) is for the shitter like almost all of your stupid comparisons.

[pumpster]

sad part is, Yates is still wider in that shot hahahaha

So what is the shot shows the complete opposite just make the claim anyway. hahahahaahahahahahahahah

[pumpster]

The new construction worker on the scene..scary similarities to the "keg"

[forcedreps]

dorian was no different genius:

 

Have I ever said yates had a awesome structure ?


But on the other hand he must have a bit better structure otherwise his lats would not be wider in the relaxed pics 

[Hulkster]

Pics from the 2006 Holland GP.

Just check colemans lat width in the first pic and then check again if he hits the pose.

your argument would make sense if it were not for the fact that Ronnie has had very famous problems spreading his lats last year and to some extent the year before.

just see all the threads about his lat injuries, or what Chad claims is inflammation.

[forcedreps]

your argument would make sense if it were not for the fact that Ronnie has had very famous problems spreading his lats last year and to some extent the year before.

just see all the threads about his lat injuries, or what Chad claims is inflammation.

Excuses excuses   I don't buy the shit, if that would be true then he would have had always lat probs after 2000.

He has skin folds on the upper lats where they should be flexed so he musst have had lat injuries since he has started with bodybuilding right ?   

Here are 2 pics from 99, one from the olympia one from the english GP.

At the olympia the lats are fully flexed at the top but on the english GP he had probs.

If you have eyes in your head then you should be able to see that it looks like day and night.

[Hulkster]

I don't think ronnie had any problems spreading his lats in 99 at the GP: