Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce (Read 3486913 times)

Hulkster · « **Reply #31350 on:** July 12, 2007, 04:39:03 PM »

LOL kind of ironic that I post 4 shots each with ronnie's quads looking better than Tom's in the shot that Pubes posted.

Now we can all see the sheer stupidity of Pubic..

Hulkster · « **Reply #31351 on:** July 12, 2007, 04:40:32 PM »

Quote from: kyomu on July 12, 2007, 07:54:15 AM

I was a huge fan of dorian. But i am keep on telling the truth.
Ronnie is in miles ahead of Dorian.

yes he was, and everyone agrees. look at the poll results, pro comments, insider comments, everything.

its just 4 losers living in the past posting on this thread that are the only souls left that think dorian is better..

Hulkster · « **Reply #31352 on:** July 12, 2007, 04:43:32 PM »

Quote from: RocketSwitch625 on July 12, 2007, 11:25:21 AM

I've never seen such a rotten looking midsection in professional bodybuilding. What were the judges thinking?

LOL I wish you could apply the same sort of critique to Dorian 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997..

you might find that his arms, quads, chest, taper and detail from the front were all fairly "rotten looking"..LOL

$:-\$

pobrecito · « **Reply #31353 on:** July 12, 2007, 04:55:51 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on July 12, 2007, 04:43:32 PM

LOL I wish you could apply the same sort of critique to Dorian 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997..

you might find that his arms, quads, chest, taper and detail from the front were all fairly "rotten looking"..LOL

$:-\$

Yet he was still better than Ronnie and smacked up all your heroes like little bitches hahaha

Team Yates for Life

Hulkster · « **Reply #31354 on:** July 12, 2007, 05:03:50 PM »

I mean honestly... $:-\$

if you guys were even HALF as critical of Yates as you are with Ronnie, you would say he looked like garbage!

everyone else seems to think so..thats why dorian barely got any votes at all compared to Ronnie.. $:-\$

pobrecito · « **Reply #31355 on:** July 12, 2007, 05:08:20 PM »

Dorian looks way way harder (an indication of less sub-q water and fat), Ronnie has better shape and separations. Apples and oranges. The judges chose Yates.

pumpster · « **Reply #31356 on:** July 12, 2007, 05:09:21 PM »

Quote from: kyomu on July 12, 2007, 07:54:15 AM

I was a huge fan of dorian. But i am keep on telling the truth.
Ronnie is in miles ahead of Dorian.

The truth? You can't handle the truth.

Hulkster · « **Reply #31357 on:** July 12, 2007, 05:19:07 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on July 12, 2007, 05:08:20 PM

Dorian looks way way harder (an indication of less sub-q water and fat), Ronnie has better shape and separations. Apples and oranges. The judges chose Yates.

yeah, when ronnie was losing contests to everyone..

they would not chose Yates had dorian met a 1999 shape ronnie.

j

phyxsius · « **Reply #31358 on:** July 12, 2007, 06:54:35 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on July 12, 2007, 04:37:59 PM

can you believe this complete MORON?

the argument that ronnie might have better thighs than Tom is not so far fetched as your ignorance would lead you to believe.

especially when you consider that Ronnie's quads were larger than Tom's (he outweighed Platz by a large margin):

and were still this cut and shapely:

no way that Ronnie beat Platz in overall quad comparison. Ronnie's quad may be huge or bigger than Tom's but Tom blew Ronnie and every one away.

By the way, Ronnie's quad muscularity and shape are pretty ordinary compared to Cormier, Flex (in terms of quad details!!!!)

pumpster · « **Reply #31359 on:** July 12, 2007, 06:57:44 PM »

Quote from: phyxsius on July 12, 2007, 06:54:35 PM

no way that Ronnie beat Platz in overall quad comparison. Ronnie's quad may be huge or bigger than Tom's but Tom blew Ronnie and every one away.

By the way, Ronnie's quad muscularity and shape are pretty ordinary compared to Cormier, Flex (in terms of quad details!!!!)

Cormier's musculature wasn't exceptional in any area; bringing him up is nitpicky to say the least.

phyxsius · « **Reply #31360 on:** July 12, 2007, 07:38:56 PM »

Quote from: pumpster on July 12, 2007, 06:57:44 PM

Cormier's musculature wasn't exceptional in any area; bringing him up is nitpicky to say the least.

Ronnie and Chris's quad muscle shape aren't much of a difference.

Tom Platz / Jay Cutler are from different world

IceCold · « **Reply #31361 on:** July 12, 2007, 07:46:52 PM »

hulkster, you trully are the most pathetic guy of all time.

IceCold · « **Reply #31362 on:** July 12, 2007, 07:48:38 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on July 12, 2007, 04:40:32 PM

yes he was, and everyone agrees. look at the poll results, pro comments, insider comments, everything.

its just 4 losers living in the past posting on this thread that are the only souls left that think dorian is better..

its actually you living in the past - like 99 and ronnie loosing now.

its only going to get worse.

all those quotes are in reference to ronnie in 2003.

NO ONE HAS SET 1 FUCKING WORD ABOUT 99.

you keep referring to 1 poll - why did you ignore the polls i posted from elit fitness and mayhem saying dorian was better.

these polls were from 2001 and 2002 - years after 99.

IceCold · « **Reply #31363 on:** July 12, 2007, 07:52:41 PM »

the fact that you think ronnie is even close to platz shows how utterly pathetic you are.

you keep talking abou polls - did you not see the thread i started asking the entire board who had better thighs - ronnie or platz - and the entire board made fun of you.

even bowflex aint stupid and delusional enough to admit that.

(despite platz being white).

IceCold · « **Reply #31364 on:** July 12, 2007, 07:55:04 PM »

Quote from: pumpster on July 12, 2007, 05:09:21 PM

The truth? You can't handle the truth.

this is the truth.

ronnie coleman - lifetime winnless against dorian yates.

IceCold · « **Reply #31365 on:** July 12, 2007, 07:57:02 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on July 12, 2007, 05:19:07 PM

yeah, when ronnie was losing contests to everyone..

they would not chose Yates had dorian met a 1999 shape ronnie.

j

elite fitness, mcgough, musle mayhem, flex, priest, dillet, etc. all said yates would beat ronnie from 99.

everything about ronnie beating dorian came from 2003 - from everyone employed by MD - saying it in an issue of MD with a photoshop pic of ronnie on the cover.

pumpster · « **Reply #31366 on:** July 12, 2007, 11:13:59 PM »

Quote from: IceCold on July 12, 2007, 07:55:04 PM

this is the truth.

Never, never accuse ice of intelligence after posting this shot of Yates with no bis against arguably the best bis and back in history hahahahahahahahah

IceCold · « **Reply #31367 on:** July 13, 2007, 07:05:18 AM »

Quote from: pumpster on July 12, 2007, 11:13:59 PM

Never, never accuse ice of intelligence after posting this shot of Yates with no bis against arguably the best bis and back in history hahahahahahahahah

i guess your clueless to the fact that depsite ronnie's better biceps, he is getting destroyed in that shot.

yates is bigger, wider, thicker, harder, dryer.

notice no xmas tree for ronnie (loose skin LMAO).

No Patience · « **Reply #31368 on:** July 13, 2007, 07:42:10 AM »

this entire thread is a waste of fucking space along with you two....get a fucking life....i would be surprised if either of you are even older than junior high, and if not, both of you need to eat a bullet

Hulkster · « **Reply #31369 on:** July 13, 2007, 02:11:57 PM »

Quote from: IceCold on July 13, 2007, 07:05:18 AM

i guess your clueless to the fact that depsite ronnie's better biceps, he is getting destroyed in that shot.

yates is bigger, wider, thicker, harder, dryer.

notice no xmas tree for ronnie (loose skin LMAO).

and you are clueless to the fact that 1996 Ronnie is nowhere near 1999 Ronnie in any way shape or form.

its like comparing 1990 dorian to 1993 dorian..

IceCold · « **Reply #31370 on:** July 13, 2007, 02:23:09 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on July 13, 2007, 02:11:57 PM

and you are clueless to the fact that 1996 Ronnie is nowhere near 1999 Ronnie in any way shape or form.

its like comparing 1990 dorian to 1993 dorian..

not according to your buddy dumpster/bowflex.

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #31371 on:** July 13, 2007, 02:31:26 PM »

When you compare Coleman to world class bodybuilders such as Yates, Schwarzenegger, Ray, Wheeler or Cutler there's just no comparison. LOL

Look at Coleman getting his ass kicked here. Does the name silverback mean anything to you Hulkster?

Hulkster · « **Reply #31372 on:** July 13, 2007, 02:59:17 PM »

LOL why I am not surprised that comparison is from ironage.us where they specifically chose only Ronnie pics from 2001 and 2002..

if they put some 99 olympia, 2001 AC or even 98 O. shots in there they would find their ancient heroes blown off the map. LOL

Hulkster · « **Reply #31373 on:** July 13, 2007, 03:02:06 PM »

can you image if they had stuck a GOOD shot of Ronnie in that spread.

l.OL

their champions of the past would be reduced to rubble!:

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #31374 on:** July 13, 2007, 03:03:56 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on July 13, 2007, 02:59:17 PM

LOL why I am not surprised that comparison is from ironage.us where they specifically chose only Ronnie pics from 2001 and 2002..

if they put some 99 olympia, 2001 AC or even 98 O. shots in there they would find their ancient heroes blown off the map. LOL

That's funny, I don't remember Yates ever looking as bad as Coleman does in that shot. He really does appear to be in poor shape. It could easily be from 2006 even though I know it's not.