Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce (Read 3489387 times)

Andre Nickatina · « **Reply #31675 on:** July 22, 2007, 11:30:05 AM »

Ronnie wins

pobrecito · « **Reply #31676 on:** July 22, 2007, 11:53:07 AM »

Quote from: Andre Nickatina on July 22, 2007, 11:30:05 AM

Ronnie wins

that's not what the judges said when they competed against each other LOL

Hulkster · « **Reply #31677 on:** July 22, 2007, 12:06:28 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on July 22, 2007, 11:53:07 AM

that's not what the judges said when they competed against each other LOL

yes. when they competed against each other.

long before Ronnie's prime.

dorian got beat by Momo in 1990.

would the judges have chosen momo over dorian in 93?

not they would not.

Same thing with dorian against a 99 Ronnie..

He would lose.

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #31678 on:** July 22, 2007, 12:20:59 PM »

Hulkster, that's too complicated for Pubes to understand.

pobrecito · « **Reply #31679 on:** July 22, 2007, 12:25:37 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on July 22, 2007, 12:06:28 PM

yes. when they competed against each other.

long before Ronnie's prime.

dorian got beat by Momo in 1990.

would the judges have chosen momo over dorian in 93?

not they would not.

Same thing with dorian against a 99 Ronnie..

He would lose.

Except Ronnie was better in 96 than 98 when he won the Olympia. Note the striated quads and tight midsection that ronnie NEVER HAD AS A MR. OLYMPIA LOL

Hulkster · « **Reply #31680 on:** July 22, 2007, 12:40:03 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on July 22, 2007, 12:25:37 PM

Except Ronnie was better in 96 than 98 when he won the Olympia. Note the striated quads and tight midsection that ronnie NEVER HAD AS A MR. OLYMPIA LOL

if you had any brains what so ever, you would know that you have overlooked the rest of the body, and besides, Ronnie's quads were MUCH better in 99 than in 96:

pobrecito · « **Reply #31681 on:** July 22, 2007, 12:48:19 PM »

Why do you keep posting blurry ass screencaps up?

Here's a photo of coleman from 99 with clearly inferior quads to 96. LOL.

And for good measure I will include a picture of the fat cow mr. druggie morphed into

Hulkster · « **Reply #31682 on:** July 22, 2007, 01:13:52 PM »

if you want clearer shots here you go:

they are STILL way better in 99 than in 96..

this is why the other getbiggers think you guys are stupid, by the way:

you are posting bizarro shit that only you would believe (eg. ronnie 96 being anything close to ronnie 99

)

Louis Cipher · « **Reply #31683 on:** July 22, 2007, 03:49:21 PM »

Quote from: suckmymuscle on July 21, 2007, 09:24:09 PM

you know what's even funnier? It is the Coleman spooge-sukers claiming that Ronnie has more defined calves than Dorian, or that he carried more mass at the 2001 ASC than at the 1999 Olympia despite being 10 lbs lighter or than Dorian despite being 13 lbs lighter. Or saying that Dorian had poor striations on his chest, or that Dorian'S arms had poor separations despite Dorian's triceps being more separated. Now this is funny!

SUCKMYMUSCLE

To say that Colema'ns taper sucked in 2003 and show a hands-clasped pic with poor lighting to prove such a point is even funnier than those!

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #31684 on:** July 22, 2007, 08:37:10 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on July 22, 2007, 12:25:37 PM

Except Ronnie was better in 96 than 98 when he won the Olympia. Note the striated quads and tight midsection that ronnie NEVER HAD AS A MR. OLYMPIA LOL

You're talking soo much about striated quads and the fact is, yates NEVER had striated quads EVER. Atleast Ronnie had them. Criticize your British hero before criticizing someone else.

pumpster · « **Reply #31685 on:** July 22, 2007, 08:44:21 PM »

Yates decisively winning sack o shit award at several Olympias:

pobrecito · « **Reply #31686 on:** July 22, 2007, 08:50:10 PM »

The original H-taper hahahahahahaha

IceCold · « **Reply #31687 on:** July 22, 2007, 09:12:04 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on July 22, 2007, 12:06:28 PM

yes. when they competed against each other.

long before Ronnie's prime.

dorian got beat by Momo in 1990.

would the judges have chosen momo over dorian in 93?

not they would not.

Same thing with dorian against a 99 Ronnie..

He would lose.

dumbass, momo beat dorian ONE time.

anything can happen once.

dorian beat ronnie for 7 FUCKING YEARS IN NUMEROUS SHOWS.

see the difference compared to your stupid analogy.

lmao.

chaos · « **Reply #31688 on:** July 22, 2007, 09:17:47 PM »

the Ronnie pooping against the red rails pic epitomises everything that is wrong with bodybuilding.

Hulkster · « **Reply #31689 on:** July 22, 2007, 09:39:58 PM »

Quote from: IceCold on July 22, 2007, 09:12:04 PM

dumbass, momo beat dorian ONE time.

anything can happen once.

dorian beat ronnie for 7 FUCKING YEARS IN NUMEROUS SHOWS.

see the difference compared to your stupid analogy.

lmao.

and this is why even other getbiggers who don't even post on this thead regularly are saying you guys are stupid.. $:-\$

it is a fair and applicable analogy because dorian was nowhere near his prime when he lost to momo, just as ronnie was nowhere near his prime when he lost to yates and everyone else who beat him.

why is this so difficult to understand?

oh wait.. you guys are stupid. that right.. $:-\$

IceCold · « **Reply #31690 on:** July 23, 2007, 08:03:14 AM »

Quote from: Hulkster on July 22, 2007, 09:39:58 PM

and this is why even other getbiggers who don't even post on this thead regularly are saying you guys are stupid.. $:-\$

it is a fair and applicable analogy because dorian was nowhere near his prime when he lost to momo, just as ronnie was nowhere near his prime when he lost to yates and everyone else who beat him.

why is this so difficult to understand?

oh wait.. you guys are stupid. that right.. $:-\$

no, dumbass, you still dont understand. you are referring to someone who lost one time - that has nothing do with someone being in their prime.

anything can happen 1 time - like gunter beating ronnie.

ronnie lost for 7 years.

yet every advantage you say ronnie has he had during those 7 years, he had against dorian - why do you not understand that?

and stop making ronnie look like nothing during those years - he was a top pro.

Hulkster · « **Reply #31691 on:** July 23, 2007, 03:37:52 PM »

Quote

yet every advantage you say ronnie has he had during those 7 years, he had against dorian - why do you not understand that?

just keep telling yourself that.

just be aware that no one agrees with you and that most people apparently think you are stupid..

and, to be honest, its not hard to see why:

pobrecito · « **Reply #31692 on:** July 23, 2007, 03:43:19 PM »

Dorian owns your life hulky hahahahahahah....

Bear · « **Reply #31693 on:** July 23, 2007, 03:45:53 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on July 22, 2007, 12:25:37 PM

Except Ronnie was better in 96 than 98 when he won the Olympia. Note the striated quads and tight midsection that ronnie NEVER HAD AS A MR. OLYMPIA LOL

Do you actually believe he was better in 96? Or are you just recycling old ND lines? lol.

pobrecito · « **Reply #31694 on:** July 23, 2007, 03:51:12 PM »

Quote from: Bear on July 23, 2007, 03:45:53 PM

Do you actually believe he was better in 96? Or are you just recycling old ND lines? lol.

Look for yourself...or maybe you are blind? $:-\$

Bear · « **Reply #31695 on:** July 23, 2007, 03:54:04 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on July 23, 2007, 03:51:12 PM

Look for yourself...or maybe you are blind? $:-\$

Oh actually yeah you're right, on the basis of this one internet picture you have convinced me his entire physique was superior that year. Including conditioning from the back, the very thing that so famously won it for him.

pobrecito · « **Reply #31696 on:** July 23, 2007, 03:55:51 PM »

Quote from: Bear on July 23, 2007, 03:54:04 PM

Oh actually yeah you're right, on the basis of this one internet picture you have convinced me his entire physique was superior that year. Including conditioning from the back, the very thing that so famously won it for him.

ehh.....the problem is Ronnie's "improvement" is hardly enough to beat Yates, considering the above physique was fighting it out with mid tier pros come Olympia time

pobrecito · « **Reply #31697 on:** July 23, 2007, 04:00:26 PM »

never ONCE as a Mr. Olympia has Ronnie tried to hit this pose....wonder why

Bear · « **Reply #31698 on:** July 23, 2007, 04:05:19 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on July 23, 2007, 03:55:51 PM

ehh.....the problem is Ronnie's "improvement" is hardly enough to beat Yates, considering the above physique was fighting it out with mid tier pros come Olympia time

Hahaha so you concede he was better in '98? Way to be consistent. I never used the word 'improvement', you did, but I agree with my misquoted self, and so do you it seems

P.S. If you win the Olympia no board troll gets to claim you are 'mid tier' anymore. Yates wasn't even in the Olympia two years before he won it, does this somehow mean he couldn't have beaten Haney? Of course not, give it up.

pobrecito · « **Reply #31699 on:** July 23, 2007, 04:44:10 PM »

Quote from: Bear on July 23, 2007, 04:05:19 PM

Hahaha so you concede he was better in '98? Way to be consistent. I never used the word 'improvement', you did, but I agree with my misquoted self, and so do you it seems

P.S. If you win the Olympia no board troll gets to claim you are 'mid tier' anymore. Yates wasn't even in the Olympia two years before he won it, does this somehow mean he couldn't have beaten Haney? Of course not, give it up.

Notice the quotation marks around the word? That means that I am hinting at irony

The only improvement Coleman did was in the gut and calves (with synthol of course) LOL.