ps ND if you are so confident that the ad populum argument is incorrect and that all the people who voted for Ronnie in the polls iceman put out with the awesome 93 vs 99 comparisons in them must be total morons and have no idea what they are doing when it comes to the judging, please start some threads on those boards and call everyone out.
grow some balls or else shut up and admit you are wrong.
one or the other.
i guess you missed this over your last breakdown.
someone made the argument that bc ronnie is more recent people will vote for him over the previous champion.
i believe that to be true for a a few reasons.
one, it is more recent in everyone's memory.
also, i was flipping through magazines from 99-01, and dorian won ever poll, best back, most muscular, etc. that had to with that people were still used to him being mr. olympia and not ronnie.
notice how i said between the years of 99-01 - that comprises the "best" of coleman that you claim. yet, bc dorian was more recent, he won the polls.
bc ronnie was more recent to date, he won the polls.
a perfect example will be in about 3 or 4 years, when jay is mr. olympia, people will point to him and not ronnie.
same exact thing your doing with yates and ronnie.
but, then, you'll talk about how ronnie still beat jay which is the same exact logic as dorian beating ronnie.
