Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[NarcissisticDeity]

ND, dorian has a collection of mediocre bodyparts on a powerlifter type frame.

that is not balanced.

his arms and quads were nowhere near up to the level of development of his back.

and his waist was incredibly thick.

you don't seem to know what balance is.

because dorian, at least compared to Ronnie, is not it.

See strawman argument ( another of your weak arguments ) A relaxed Yates compared to a flex Ronnie lol I know what balance is kid and so does the IFBB judge who said this 

Bev Francis : Bodybuilder's phsyique you most admire ?

The man Dorian Yates , his combonation of size and shape makes for an awesome physique , unlike a lot of big guys he's not a load of massive parts just thrown together , His symmetry is almost perfect , Everything is in proportion , no weak bodyparts .


please learn what balance & proportion are before you type , because Ronnie is NOT it

[Hulkster]

Your silence speaks volumes 

and 1994 would destroy ANY side triceps shot Ronnie has never mind his prime.

lol why? because his arm is smaller, with far less definition?

ronnie's tris (when in the sort of shape he was in 99) are even better than dorian's (even in 93):

[NarcissisticDeity]

no one ever said ND was smart.

in fact, he has demonstrated his lack of basic thinking and understanding skills time and time again.

but its okay, McDonald's will goes easy on him..lol

Funny you said I was smart in this thread  and again you people can't counter my argument , you even admitted that before 

[Hulkster]

when ND can't counter the obvious visual dominance of Ronnie over dorian, he goes right back to the quotes..

 

[colie]

Since you came here you've yet to convey an intelligent point , you've done nothing except troll . please get in the game or sit on the side lines.

fuck off junior....post a pic....or shut the fuck up!

i might be new to this site...but i have been in the game many years....


this one's or you honey...

[NarcissisticDeity]

lol why? because his arm is smaller, with far less definition?

ronnie's tris (when in the sort of shape he was in 99) are even better than dorian's (even in 93):

lol Ronnie whole side triceps shot leaves a lot to be desired it always has , Shawn Ray pointed this out ( and so have I ) and McGough said Yates' side triceps is a masterpiece I mean stop fixating on the size of the arm thats NOT how contests are won , its the overall criteria in the entire shot , Yates is the criteria

[Hulkster]

you can tell ND is royally pissed off that after making the argument that Dorian had a better side tri and side chest than 99 Ronnie for 1200 pages, his argument goes right down the toilet with great shots of 99 Ronnie..

and it is driving him crazy..

LOL

[NarcissisticDeity]

when ND can't counter the obvious visual dominance of Ronnie over dorian, he goes right back to the quotes..

 

Visual dominance based on what YOUR opinion , Ronnie's side triceps sucks ( compared to Yates ) the fact that you think its better is NOT evidence , the fact that Yates is the criteria in this shot shows your lack knowledge , Ronnie can't beat Yates in this pose because he doesn't have the density & conditioning , the balance & proportion , he lacking to much to beat Yates

[JOHN MATRIX]

It actually hasn't , they're really don't even know how contests are judged , they don't know the criteria , , they are clueless , they're arguments have been throughly address , corrected and dismissed .

look i know what your saying, but when all is said and done, the ONLY THING a prime dorian had on a prime ronald is calves. and maybe forearms. and thats IT. ronald had a better overall shape, better biceps, equal triceps, better back, better quads, better hams, better chest, and better delts, better seperation and vascularity.

dorian was great and i support his wins even in 94 but a 98-2001 ronald would have dominated him.

[Hulkster]

I also love how we are told by retarded ND to "stop fixating on the arms" in ARM POSES like the side tri and front double bi..

 

and this guy tell US we don't know what we are doing when it comes to judging..
 

Next time you post and ab shot of Ronnie, I am going to tell you to "stop fixating on the ABS"

 

complete and total idiot, who thinks everyone else is wrong, when, as we can see, it is him that is completely incorrect ..

[colie]

ah fuck...i'm pissed off talking to a retard who has never even seen Dozzers muscle in the flesh...trying to tell me who has a better physique....

what a spunkwipe

[Hulkster]

look i know what your saying, but when all is said and done, the ONLY THING a prime dorian had on a prime ronald is calves. and maybe forearms. and thats IT. ronald had a better overall shape, better biceps, equal triceps, better back, better quads, better hams, better chest, and better delts, better seperation and vascularity.

dorian was great and i support his wins even in 94 but a 98-2001 ronald would have dominated him.

dorian had better abs too.

But ronnie wins ALL mandatory poses excep the

front lat
ab shot


Ronnie wins the other 6 as we have clearly shown and its Driving ND NUTS.

thats why he is frantically posting as many quotes as he can, and now taking offseason shots in an effort to make dorian's pathetic arms seem bigger and better..

[Hulkster]

ah fuck...i'm pissed off talking to a retard who has never even seen Dozzers muscle in the flesh...trying to tell me who has a better physique....

what a spunkwipe

I have seen either.

I am basing my opinion on the 1400 pages of Ronnie visual dominance.

[colie]

was talking to ND...the sperm bucket ...hulkster....not u mate

[NarcissisticDeity]

you can tell ND is royally pissed off that after making the argument that Dorian had a better side tri and side chest than 99 Ronnie for 1200 pages, his argument goes right down the toilet with great shots of 99 Ronnie..

and it is driving him crazy..

LOL

Hulkster you type empty words the criteria is on my side , you're so desperate to counter my argument you just type wild nonsense , I have quotes and pictures to back up my claim , you just type thats all you're left with and Ronnie's side tricep from 1999 is old , we've seen this as much as you'd like to think these ' new ' pics are a nail in the coffin they're not

its a terrible shot and let me explain why , the side head of his triceps is thin ( see Boyer Coe ) his forearms are NOT in proportion with his biceps/triceps , his abdominals are sticking out , his calves are missing in action to try and minimize this he poses with his legs close together ( and it doesn't work ) they're not in proportion with his oversized quads , his conditioning is NOT on par with 1998 nevermind Dorian Yates , his density is NOT on par with Dorian Yates , Dorian's side triceps shot has been described as a ' masterpiece ' and Ronnie's as " never a strong shot for him " I mean you can't counter this try , try and counter this I dare you ...stop posting pictures and making blanket statements back your shit up kid , this is how its done 

Textbook side triceps

[Hulkster]

its okay, I knew you were referring to the laughing stock of getbig, ND.

ND agues that all the visual domiance of dorian is not actually dominance because dorian 'looks better' in real life.

Problem is, he doesn NOT place the same argument on Ronnie, who, I guess according to ND, would NOT look better than he does in the pictures..

[NarcissisticDeity]

dorian had better abs too.

But ronnie wins ALL mandatory poses excep the

front lat
ab shot


Ronnie wins the other 6 as we have clearly shown and its Driving ND NUTS.

thats why he is frantically posting as many quotes as he can, and now taking offseason shots in an effort to make dorian's pathetic arms seem bigger and better..

lol that shot was from the photo shoot right after the 1995 Mr Olympia so its NOT offseason lol jack ass how much more wrong can you get , Dorian has advantages in every mandatory pose not matter what .

[colie]

[NarcissisticDeity]

its okay, I knew you were referring to the laughing stock of getbig, ND.

ND agues that all the visual domiance of dorian is not actually dominance because dorian 'looks better' in real life.

Problem is, he doesn NOT place the same argument on Ronnie, who, I guess according to ND, would NOT look better than he does in the pictures..

Yawn , tried arguments you present , its like this kid you need me to be the laughing stock of GetBig because this somehow validates you're right , if you were right and I was wrong this thread would have ended page ONE I was confident in my argument to leave well enough alone you weren't , speaks volumes 

[colie]

how about we discuss the calf to delt ratio of the above pics....mmmmmm

calves just ...emmm stayed...yet the rrest of the muscles atrophied?


ND?

[Hulkster]

Yawn , tried arguments you present , its like this kid you need me to be the laughing stock of GetBig because this somehow validates you're right , if you were right and I was wrong this thread would have ended page ONE I was confident in my argument to leave well enough alone you weren't , speaks volumes 

just because you are confident does NOT mean you are correct.

everyone has been showing you this with comparison after comparison.

but you are too stubborn and ignorant to see it..

[Deadpool]

 

[NarcissisticDeity]

just because you are confident does NOT mean you are correct.

everyone has been showing you this with comparison after comparison.

but you are too stubborn and ignorant to see it..

Again prove me wrong , back up your claims you type empty words and stick to just posting pictures thats all you can do , because you know you can't counter my argument .

[Hulkster]

Again prove me wrong , back up your claims you type empty words and stick to just posting pictures thats all you can do , because you know you can't counter my argument .

like I said, stupid stupid stupid.

we have been explaining why and then showing with visual proof for 1400 pages now.

what the fuck have you been reading all this time?

[NarcissisticDeity]

like I said, stupid stupid stupid.

we have been explaining why and then showing with visual proof for 1400 pages now.

what the fuck have you been reading all this time?

CONTESTS are NOT I repeat NOT judged on your interpretation of the criteria or what wins contests , I gave your argument a chance , learned quickly you're ignorant of how contests are judged and taught you the right way , your visual proof is NOT accurate its based on personal preference , you are proven wrong. soundly.