ronnie never had big triceps comparable to his biceps. flex's were always on par with his bis and quite big too. i cant imagine them looking as small as ronnies even from a shot looking at the back of the arm in that pose. i think its more the outer head for ronnie, which is why it looks small in side chest shots.
ronnie's tris were huge, separated and striated.
ken's weren't. they were bulbous and full of oil. soft.
agreed, ronnie's tris weren't as impressionable as his bis but they were outrageous none the less.
thing is, he had so much else on his body completely blowing people's minds that folks have to look hard for a weak point. people point to tris to fulfill that purpose. thing is, they weren't so much a weak point, just couldn't match his super freaky bis. could anyone's?
