I'm going to teach you morons about converging evidence I'll use for my example this outstanding back double biceps shot from the 1995 Mr Olympia
Lets start with the Official IFBB Judging
The comparisons of the compulsory poses cannot be overemphasized
as these comparisons will help the judge to decide
which competitor has the superior physique from the standpoint of
muscular bulk, balanced development, muscular density and
definition.
Now lets get a critique on Dorian's ' symmetry ' from ironically enough an IFBB Judge
Bev Francis : Bodybuilder's phsyique you most admire ?
The man Dorian Yates , his combonation of size and shape makes for an awesome physique , unlike a lot of big guys he's not a load of massive parts just thrown together , His symmetry is almost perfect , Everything is in proportion , no weak bodyparts .
Now lets couple that with McGough's quote on his density & conditioning
While I’m on record as saying that the best physique I ever saw was Ronnie’s at the 2001 Arnold, he was never drier or harder than Dorian. In fact now that – 14 years after it happened – I recently for the first time saw the video of Dorian posing before the 1993 Olympia I have cause to rethink. I’m now not sure that Ronnie at 245 pounds would beat Dorian at 269 pounds. At a bigger bodyweight I think Ronnie would look soft next to an in-shape rock-hard Dorian.
On the subject of conditioning, no-one did it better than Dorian. He achieved a hardness and dryness (without losing fullness) that nobody has ever matched. In the flesh he looked even harder than he did in photos. It was like a statue made of granite was standing in front of you.
Now all those points converge and proves MY point that Dorian meets the criteria better than Ronnie and would beat him , you idiots have yet you counter this you're to busy stuck in denial about his conditioning
2001 Arnold Classic is 244-247 pounds MAX Dorian is 269 pounds that covers the muscular bulk part of the criteria all evidence converges to one point and thats Dorian Yates .
