Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[aussiepro]

flex is shitting on ronnie in that pic, ronnie was not pleasing to the eye flex was amazing.....
And this thread is never gonna end maybe its time to give it a rest...
OH AND DORIAN WINS HANDS DOWN, HOPE THAT HELPS

[IceCold]

even flex wheeler's legendary rear double bi can't come close to Ronnie's at his best: 8

actually, flex was very close - 2 points from beating ronnie at his best in 98.

while flex was extremely off, and his best was crushed by yates.

hmmmmm.

[Hulkster]

you still seem to think your opinion is the final say when nothing could be further from the truth.

LOL you seem to think that your opinion is widely held based on the visual evidence LOL

 


http://www.musclemecca.com/showthread.php/better-99-03-ronnie-93-95-yates-9710.html?s=96183a0307242874d6341cadd9f1be87&t=9710

notice: 99 Ronnie has more votes than either 2003 Ronnie, or either version of Yates.

why? because he was amazing and everyone knows it.

go ahead and rig these ones too LOL

and in case you missed it, lots has been said about 99  Ronnie:

http://www.musclemecca.com/showthread.php/99-coleman-everyone-else-4268.html?t=4268

deal with it.

[NeoSeminole]

Lights Out, Game Over!!!

[Hulkster]

dorian's gym shots didn't come close to that.

just like his best contest physiqe didn't come close overall to Dorian's 93/5 best.

and he was better conditioned too!

[Hulkster]

that rear lat spread is incredible. christmas tree and everything.

dorian's never had that. all he had was loose wrinkled rolls of fat.

lol

[Mussolini]

Hulkster you are completley dellusional to think that Rons best conditioning was even close to Dorians, on stage or in the gym. On stage Dorians worst conditioning is still superior to Rons best.

[Necrosis]

Hulkster you are completley dellusional to think that Rons best conditioning was even close to Dorians, on stage or in the gym. On stage Dorians worst conditioning is still superior to Rons best.

\

prove it

[Hulkster]

\

prove it

its pretty hard to prove something when all the visual evidence in the world proves the exact opposite of what you are trying to prove LOL:

1500+ pages of proof that Ronnie was better conditioned is plenty:

[England_1]

Gotta love how hulkster posts a shot where Dorian isn't even flexing yet 

Try this shot, Coleman can't match it 

[Hulkster]

wrong.

[Hulkster]

what really sets Ronnie's back apart from dorian's is the depth and thickness that it has.

dorian's back has always been very flat and thin looking in the rear double bi pose, but it was detailed, much like Flex's back. Relative to Ronnie's, dorian's back really lacked depth and thickness. It had detail, but Ronnie's back had detail, depth, thickness AND amazing arms. just compare:

 and in the rear lat spread, his taper was not nearly as good as Ronnie's. Plus, where Ronnie shows his christmas tree in the rear lat spread, dorian shows his rolls of loose skin.

dorian's back was good.

Ronnie's was in a class all by itself.

[Hulkster]

notice: Ronnie's 99 back eclipses dorian's back in both poses.

dorian's back was detailed, but thin and flat looking compared to Ronnie's.

you can see it too in this comparison:

dorian's back is much like Flex's : detailed, but thin and lacking the depth that Ronnie's back has:

ronnie's back was the complete package, unlike either dorian or flex, who had detail, but at the expense of depth and thickness:

[brian36]

How can people be so blind to say Dorian is anywhere near Coleman?  This is absurd.

[NeoSeminole]

Ronnie has better mass, detail, and symmetry.

[sculpture]

what really sets Ronnie's back apart from dorian's is the depth and thickness that it has.
dorian's back has always been very flat and thin looking in the rear double bi pose, but it was detailed, much like Flex's back. Relative to Ronnie's, dorian's back really lacked depth and thickness. It had detail, but Ronnie's back had detail, depth, thickness AND amazing arms. just compare:

 and in the rear lat spread, his taper was not nearly as good as Ronnie's. Plus, where Ronnie shows his christmas tree in the rear lat spread, dorian shows his rolls of loose skin.

dorian's back was good.

Ronnie's was in a class all by itself.

I don't agree with that. Dorian has/had some of the thickest if not the thickest lats ever especially the lower lats and around the spinal erectors

[Hulkster]

I don't agree with that. Dorian has/had some of the thickest if not the thickest lats ever especially the lower lats and around the spinal erectors

agreed. but in the back double bi pose, his back has a very flat, thin appearence. but it is detailed.

a quick comparison of the 'christmas tree' pose shows how much thicker Ronnie was in this area.

look at how thin/flat dorian's back becomes when he raises his arms in the rear double bi.

ronnie's is much thicker looking in the same pose:

[Hulkster]

How can people be so blind to say Dorian is anywhere near Coleman?  This is absurd.

because the dorian' nuthuggers are stupid, and have no idea how to evaluate a physique.

hope this helps.

[England_1]

Ronnie's quads aren't even close to this:

[England_1]

You don't see quality like this anymore

[m8]

Ronnie's quads aren't even close to this:

That's a pretty sick shot.

[England_1]

The only problem I see with Platz's legs is that his calves are undersized compared to his quads. They were detailed as hell though.

[Meso_z]

Ronnie's quads aren't even close to this:

holy shit i haven't seen that pic b4!!!!!! 

[Hulkster]

You don't see quality like this anymore

agreed. Shawn was incredible.

[Hulkster]

 why is this thread even going again?