Well, the great Sucky has reappeared like a ghost out of ND's ass. Let us see SwallowNDsLoad, you claim in another thread that Coleman circa 1998 had a top ten physique of all time. Yes, you did rate Yate's 1993 number four or five, but still you did not have him listed under any other year in your list. Funny, you continually have claimed in this thread that Ronnie could have never beaten the great Dorian Yates....
. Hummh, let us think this over for one minute. I will go very slow as I don't want to lose you...are you still with me Swallow. So, Yate's in 1997 was considered almost universally to having been gifted a Mr. Olympia except by you. He looked like shit, even ND admits this. However, you have stated many times that if Yates wouldn't have retired that Coleman would have never won the Mr. Olympia. WTF, then you prove Pumpster right and everyone else here correct when they claim that Mr. Olympia's are not always won; they are often gifted to the defending champ. You see, if a Yates that was even a semblance of his 1997 form would have beaten Ronnie 1998, it would prove how poor IFBB judging really is. Thus, it validates everyone's point that Yates looked good only in 1992/1993 and 1995 (marginal except for conditioning and his back). In 1994, 1996 and 1997; he looked like a turd. So, if you and ND would only admit the fact that Coleman would have anally raped Yates in 1998, this thread would die. We could hypothesize for a zillion years how Yates circa 1993 would do against Ronnie 1998/1999/2001 ASC. However, the fact is, and Hulkster and Pumpster and repeatedly pointed this out, your boy would have gotten beat down in 1998 if he chose to compete. Thus, Ronnie would have beaten Yates. Regardless, I anxiously await your witty retort.
I can hear the cursing....now.
You are the greatest milker of Ronnie's balls I've seen. No, not Huckster. He comes at a distant second. On another thread, you almost jacked-offed to a video of Ronnie doing a 2300 lbs leg press. You couldn't stop complimenting how mighty and strong he is, etc.
"Reappeared as a ghost out of NDs ass"? Wtf are you talking about, bitch? I have been posting on this thread since page 4 or 5 or so and haven't been absent since. I make my own comments and post my own pics and don't need anyone to validate what I do. Doesen't the fact that me and Narcissistic seldom agree - except that Dorian is better than Ronnie - tell you something about my independence? You idiot.
You are so stupid that you point out that he thinks Dorian should have lost in 97, whereas I think he was still the clear winner, yet you still think I'm some kind of lackey of his, who agrees with his every word! Moron. Yes, Dorian was at his worst in 97, but he would still defeat any version of Ronnie except, perhaps, the one he had at the 98 O.
If Dorian competed in 98, yes, he would be given the title, irrespective of the packge he brought onstage. It does not follow, however, that he was given the title in 97. Who would they have given it to, instead? A Nasser, who had no back? A Shawn Ray who was outweighed, by Dorian, by some 55 lbs? A Kevin who was clearly off? You retard! Bodybuilding is a relative sport, where you are compared to others onstage. A point could be ade that he deserved to lose in 97. But the fact is that his major liability, his distended belly, was not severe enough - unlike Coleman's in 2003/04 - to neglect his
OVERWHELING superiority in everything else.
I had promised not to reply to any other of your sub-par posts, because you're not a worthy rival in this discussion - unlike Huckster and PraetorFenix - and it is obvious that you have a personal proble with me. You are also a cowardly "man". You threatened to call the Feds on me, and I called your bluff and won. I knew you would bitch out, as usual. I won't reply to any of your posts anymore, you worthless cun t, because ignoring you is the greatest degree of attention you deserve to receive from your superiors, such as yours truly. Farewell, loser.

SUCKMYMUSCLE