Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce (Read 3518079 times)

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #7350 on:** July 31, 2006, 01:36:28 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on July 31, 2006, 01:30:32 PM

I saw the 95 olympia on tape. Dorian should not have won with the torn bicep. He was no longer complete and does not represent what a mr. olympia should be. I should not have to cringe when the Mr. Olympia hits a front double bicep.

Are you kidding me? Ronnie with gyno is acceptable to you and represents a Mr Olympia ? and how about his missing calves? okay he should lose the front double biceps pose thats it , remember a torn bicep can be hidden but weak calves can be seen in every single pose from every single angle .

pobrecito · « **Reply #7351 on:** July 31, 2006, 01:37:52 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on July 31, 2006, 01:36:28 PM

Are you kidding me? Ronnie with gyno is acceptable to you and represents a Mr Olympia ? and how about his missing calves? okay he should lose the front double biceps pose thats it , remember a torn bicep can be hidden but weak calves can be seen in every single pose from every single angle .

a torn bicep is much, much more significant than oddly shaped calves. Ronnie's calves are BIG, but shape sucks. If you watch the '99 olympia his calves actually look decent when he hits the rear double bicep.

suckmymuscle · « **Reply #7352 on:** July 31, 2006, 01:42:57 PM »

Quote from: pumpster on July 31, 2006, 11:18:48 AM

SUCKY with absolutely no balance in silly reasoning-where would that leave someone with ALL the above PLUS arms too small for a barrel chest, insufficient size up top to offset similar ab probs, AND unpleasant aesthetics?..LOL

I can see you've just posted the same pics from the 1997 olympia yet again, Poop. Try these pics and show me, exactly, how Dorian does not look fantasti in them...

By the way, I was refering to the 2003 Ronnie, not to his smaller versions.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #7353 on:** July 31, 2006, 01:44:36 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on July 31, 2006, 01:37:52 PM

a torn bicep is much, much more significant than oddly shaped calves. Ronnie's calves are BIG, but shape sucks. If you watch the '99 olympia his calves actually look decent when he hits the rear double bicep.

I disagree I think ' bitch-tits ' on the best bodybuilder on the planet is laughable , Dorian's torn biceps was shorter than the other and okay it looks odd in the front double biceps pose and maybe he should lose that particular pose but it can't be seen in any other , gyno can be seen in the front double biceps , ab-thigh .

and while Ronnie's calves in 99 looked ' decent ' they are still serevely lacking in size , balance , and development for a Mr Olympia winner .

Van_Bilderass · « **Reply #7354 on:** July 31, 2006, 01:45:01 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on July 31, 2006, 01:30:32 PM

I saw the 95 olympia on tape. Dorian should not have won with the torn bicep. He was no longer complete and does not represent what a mr. olympia should be. I should not have to cringe when the Mr. Olympia hits a front double bicep.

Yeah the torn arm was a problem but apart from that he was the clear winner, 95 was his best shape. Anyone remember what Dillet said about the 95 O? He praised Yates to no end, said he was far beyond anyone else.

pobrecito · « **Reply #7355 on:** July 31, 2006, 01:48:19 PM »

Quote from: Van_Bilderass on July 31, 2006, 01:45:01 PM

Yeah the torn arm was a problem but apart from that he was the clear winner, 95 was his best shape. Anyone remember what Dillet said about the 95 O? He praised Yates to no end, said he was far beyond anyone else.

Dorian NEEDS both arms as good as possible to even compete with coleman...so when you only have 1, I dont think he stands a chance...

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #7356 on:** July 31, 2006, 01:49:35 PM »

Quote from: Van_Bilderass on July 31, 2006, 01:45:01 PM

Yeah the torn arm was a problem but apart from that he was the clear winner, 95 was his best shape. Anyone remember what Dillet said about the 95 O? He praised Yates to no end, said he was far beyond anyone else.

Paul Dillett after seening Dorian at the 1995 Mr Olympia " I've just seen Jesus Christ and he looks like Dorian Yates . "

suckmymuscle · « **Reply #7357 on:** July 31, 2006, 01:50:47 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on July 31, 2006, 01:30:32 PM

I saw the 95 olympia on tape. Dorian should not have won with the torn bicep. He was no longer complete and does not represent what a mr. olympia should be. I should not have to cringe when the Mr. Olympia hits a front double bicep.

Ok. And this should have won in 2004?

$:-\$

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Van_Bilderass · « **Reply #7358 on:** July 31, 2006, 01:51:55 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on July 31, 2006, 01:49:35 PM

Paul Dillett after seening Dorian at the 1995 Mr Olympia " I've just seen Jesus Christ and he looks like Dorian Yates . "

Yup that's the quote I remembered.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #7359 on:** July 31, 2006, 01:54:05 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on July 31, 2006, 01:48:19 PM

Dorian NEEDS both arms as good as possible to even compete with coleman...so when you only have 1, I dont think he stands a chance...

And you need two calves as well lets not overlook that !

Ronnie from 1998 .

pumpster · « **Reply #7360 on:** July 31, 2006, 01:54:10 PM »

These guys would rather stick with a 10-year old comment vs. Yates' own more recent appraisal that he would lose!

pumpster · « **Reply #7361 on:** July 31, 2006, 01:55:08 PM »

Quote

Explain to me how Dorian is NOT complete?

This has explained maybe 52 times over the preceeding pages. Familiarize yourself with the previous dialogue rather than acting like a tourist here, huh?

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #7362 on:** July 31, 2006, 01:55:58 PM »

Quote from: suckmymuscle on July 31, 2006, 01:50:47 PM

Ok. And this should have won in 2004? $:-\$

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Great point 2004 was another joke absolutely huge and smooth as a babies ass .

pobrecito · « **Reply #7363 on:** July 31, 2006, 01:56:08 PM »

Quote from: suckmymuscle on July 31, 2006, 01:50:47 PM

Ok. And this should have won in 2004? $:-\$

SUCKMYMUSCLE

becuase he faced inferior competition.

pumpster · « **Reply #7364 on:** July 31, 2006, 01:56:12 PM »

Quote

Using their competitive records to gauge who is better is as much of a joke as the actual "competitions".

Absolutely, but "facts" like their competitive records = ND's liferaft for about the last 200 pages!

sculpture · « **Reply #7365 on:** July 31, 2006, 01:56:42 PM »

Quote from: suckmymuscle on July 31, 2006, 01:50:47 PM

Ok. And this should have won in 2004? $:-\$

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Again you criticize the O to no end but when challenged to discuss your "winner" from that contest you conveniently slip away for a few days becuase you know who ever you choose can be ripped apart just as much if not more than you do of ronnie.

As for dorian winning 95 O, you can argue either way.. I have it on video, if only a could post screencaps of this and the appalling 94 fiasco i would and it would shut up some dorian fans.

Make no mistake he displayed a gut which none of his contempories did but he had awesome conditioning.

This is whats upsetting. You have guys like flex, shawnnm levrone and nasser who all reached their peaks in the mid nineties.

Their crime? They simply hit them at the wrong time. A time when the judges saw it fit to award the ugliest physique.

pobrecito · « **Reply #7366 on:** July 31, 2006, 01:57:03 PM »

Quote from: pumpster on July 31, 2006, 01:55:08 PM

This has explained maybe 52 times over the preceeding pages. Familiarize yourself with the previous dialogue rather than acting like a tourist here, huh?

you really are dumb aren't you. It's my opinion that Dorian WAS complete in '93....I'd just like to hear what kind of nonsense you can come up with to persuade me to believe that he was NOT complete

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #7367 on:** July 31, 2006, 01:57:58 PM »

Quote from: pumpster on July 31, 2006, 01:54:10 PM

These guys would rather stick with a 10-year old comment vs. Yates' own more recent appraisal that he would lose!

Yates said the judges may ( keyword ) go with Ronnie just based on his extra weight , Dorian also said it was a very hard question for him to answer . let someone ask him how he would fair against Ronnie 98/99 I'm sure you'll get a different answer .

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #7368 on:** July 31, 2006, 01:59:53 PM »

Quote from: pumpster on July 31, 2006, 01:56:12 PM

Absolutely, but "facts" like their competitive records = ND's liferaft for about the last 200 pages!

Facts trump your conspricy theories , you've offered up nothing in the way of facts just hearsay and fantasy .

pumpster · « **Reply #7369 on:** July 31, 2006, 02:02:00 PM »

Quote

Quote from: pumpster on Today at 04:56:12 PM
Absolutely, but "facts" like their competitive records = ND's liferaft for about the last 200 pages!

Facts trump your conspricy theories , you've offered up nothing in the way of facts just hearsay and fantasy .

Facts have been provided on many things and are deliberately ignored so as to prolong the furious back-peddling which is all that he has left. hahahahhahaha

pumpster · « **Reply #7370 on:** July 31, 2006, 02:03:13 PM »

Quote

you really are dumb aren't you. It's my opinion that Dorian WAS complete in '93....I'd just like to hear what kind of nonsense you can come up with to persuade me to believe that he was NOT complete

Can't get much dumbed than someone who asked questions that have already been answered over and over again in preceeding pages he's too lazy to bother reading. Get with it tourist or don't bother. hahahahaah

pobrecito · « **Reply #7371 on:** July 31, 2006, 02:03:40 PM »

dorian only trained 3.5 hours per week...whereas most of his competitors trained that long per day

pobrecito · « **Reply #7372 on:** July 31, 2006, 02:04:26 PM »

one thing is for sure....Dorian was easily the crowd favorite in '93. He easily got the loudest and most cheers.

alexxx · « **Reply #7373 on:** July 31, 2006, 02:09:23 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on July 31, 2006, 02:03:40 PM

dorian only trained 3.5 hours per week...whereas most of his competitors trained that long per day

Because he was lazy?

sculpture · « **Reply #7374 on:** July 31, 2006, 02:12:55 PM »

Yes.

Actually he said it was because he found himself prone to over training really easy and would suffer colds constantly